Regardless of whether the three views are correct or not, just say that other people's poems are really good. Besides, personally, chatting with others is not necessarily the original intention of this poem. No one has to answer other people's words according to the original intention of this poem, but may just use the superficial meaning of this sentence as an answer.
Let's talk about three views of this poem. If it was in the Tang and Song Dynasties, it was more praise for this kind of thing. Besides, they are registered. Writing this poem is not only its superficial meaning, but also a euphemism for refusing other people's courtship. In addition, the Tang and Song Dynasties are actually a relatively open opportunity, so right. Many things are tolerant, so I have an inclusive attitude towards this matter. I think this poem really describes the loyalty of a good wife and mother. At that time, in the Tang and Song Dynasties, maybe they felt good enough, after all. In addition to women at that time, they could remarry in addition to observing festivals.
However, in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the society at that time was different, and their feudal thoughts were stronger and more conservative. So for people in that period, this is a poem with three incorrect views. Now that you are having an affair, what's the use? Accept other people's things, and finally refuse because of family wealth and other reasons. This means that you are tempted. Can that be considered the loyalty of a virtuous woman? It can only be said that the collision of ideas occurred in different times, but this poem is commendable, at least his poem is familiar to the people and applied to reality.