"Ruthlessness is not necessarily a true hero. How can Reiko Kobayakawa not be a husband?" From Lu Xun's Answer the Guest.
The next sentence is "Do you know that those who make a fuss look back smaller than Tu?" Do you know those tigers that make noise in the mountains always turn around to look after their cubs?
Lu Xun told us that there is no contradiction between warmth and her husband's heroism. People who know how to love may know more about courage and responsibility and become real men.
Poetry appreciation:
The first two sentences of this poem, "Ruthlessness may not be a real hero, but Reiko Kobayakawa is not a husband", are solid, powerful and irrefutable, and are well-known sentences. The author didn't tell the story with pen and ink. From the beginning, he argued eloquently with philosophical poems that "heartless" people may not be real heroes, but "Reiko Kobayakawa" people may be courageous people.
The poem strongly retaliates against those critics who play with "sentimentality" and "ruthlessness" abstractly, and seriously points out that those who boo themselves with "ruthlessness" are not heroes, and it is even meaner to show their ruthlessness by attacking others' "Reiko Kobayakawa". In Lu Xun's view, whether he is a hero is not whether he is Reiko Kobayakawa or not, but whether he is ruthless to the enemy.
In the poem, a "not necessarily" is first used to deny the "heartless" theorists, and then a "how" is used to heckle those who attack "Reiko Kobayakawa" and make them speechless. These two poems are written in antithesis, but they are not right in love, not in scenery, but in reason. Very philosophical and powerful.
Lu Xun loved his son rightfully under the fire at that time, and extended this feeling to the broad masses of the people. It was not the true nature of a husband, but a person who flaunted "ruthlessness" and had nothing to do with heroes. The poet denounced the "heartless" theorist, and instead of avoiding "Reiko Kobayakawa", he used "Reiko Kobayakawa" to prove the meanness of the attacker and gained the initiative completely.
These two poems have profound meanings, natural confrontation, negative affirmation, judgment and questioning, effortless and relaxed, which makes satirists feel ashamed.