The spiritual realm of "I don't have to succeed" and the historical responsibility of "I must succeed" are timeless! How to understand this?

On the one hand, "success must have me" emphasizes the existence of "having me", consciously overcomes the "bystander" mentality, does not be an outsider, and "does his duty; In its place, seek its own government ",maintain the high-spirited fighting spirit of striving for progress, making achievements and daring to take responsibility, and pursue the self-realization of the value of life.

On the other hand, emphasizing "success is not about me" is not about passivity, laziness and inaction, but about firmly establishing a correct view of political achievements, not only doing practical things that people can see, feel and benefit, but also paving the way, laying a foundation and benefiting future generations, making outstanding achievements as well as potential achievements. "Draw a blueprint to the end", year after year, one after another. Regardless of personal fame, what we pursue is the good reputation of the people and the true evaluation after historical precipitation.

In reality, there are always people who simply separate "having me" from "having me": some distort the understanding that "success must have me", enlarge "having me" to "being the only one", make decisions and implement them regardless of objective laws and actual conditions, attach importance to "outstanding achievements", despise "potential achievements", are eager to get ahead, and even do something remarkable at all costs. Be the name of "having me" and the reality of "being the only one". Some unilaterally emphasize "I don't have to succeed", muddling through everything, not being serious, not being serious, not working hard and doing nothing, being a monk for a day, regardless of whether the bell rings, just thinking about the immediate comfort and forgetting the responsibility and responsibility. In fact, these two one-sided and narrow understandings are wrong, violate the philosophical principle of dialectical unity, mislead people's thoughts and behaviors, and cause serious harm, which must be resolutely corrected.

From the perspective of essential connotation, "for me" and "for me" are unified. If "I don't have to succeed" emphasizes a state of mind, then "I must succeed" emphasizes a responsibility and responsibility. Only by adhering to the high unity of "being with me" and "being with me" can we fully realize that "being with me" and "being with me" are two sides of the same problem, with the same source, essence and goal.

From the perspective of causality, "success must have me" is the primary premise, responsibility and goal pursuit. As far as "I don't have to succeed" is concerned, this is the sublimation and choice of "I must succeed". At any time, we should deeply understand the dialectical relationship of interdependence, mutual promotion, mutual restriction and mutual cause and effect between "you and me" and "you and me", show "you and me" in "you and me" and never forget "you and me" in order to ensure that all undertakings will move from victory to victory.

From a practical point of view, "being me" focuses on practical actions, and "being me" focuses on value orientation. The former pays attention to the ability to act, while the latter emphasizes the concept of position. The organic combination of the two is the organic combination of thought and practice, and it is the practical process of the integration of knowledge and practice. "Success must come from me", which urges us to work hard in our posts. "Success is not in me" urges us to establish a correct world outlook, outlook on life and values, and to understand and treat our responsibilities with the ideological weapon of seeking truth from facts and objective dialectics.