What kind of writing is a good writing style?

■ Zhang Guotao's writing style is a mirror of the party style. The style of writing in each period reflects the party style in that period. The style of writing is related to the image of the party and the success or failure of the cause of the party and the state. It is necessary and timely for the central authorities to improve the style of writing. What is a good style of writing? Simply put, it means "short, practical and new", that is, the written articles can make readers understand, like and read the letter. A pragmatic, dedicated and entrepreneurial leading cadre will not only tell the truth, tell the truth, reason and make it clear. A leading cadre who is good at solving problems and doing things efficiently will not only stick to procedures and piece together sentences, but also deliberately pursue formal beauty. Instead, it will be clearly targeted. If you do more, you will be short, and you will try your best to stop it and make your words work. A dynamic and innovative leading cadre, his articles will not only be pale, obsolete, shriveled and mechanical, but also be closely linked with reality, and he will strive to innovate and be loved by readers. A leading cadre with simple style, caring for the people, sincere desire to be an official and good at doing things, his articles will be simple, concise and convincing instead of putting on airs, pretending to be mysterious and showing off new terms. It should be pointed out that it is absolutely correct to advocate "short, real and new" and oppose "false" and "empty", but we should analyze "long" dialectically. Winston Churchill, the former British Prime Minister, once said that if I had to give a speech for two hours, I could give a speech immediately. If I am allowed to make a speech for half an hour, it will take me three days to prepare; If I am allowed to give a five-minute speech, I will have a week to prepare. This shows that the shorter the article, the more difficult it is to write under the premise of determining the theme and theme. There are "two hours", "half an hour" and "five minutes", which is better? That depends on the needs of the theme and task, as well as the audience's reflection and evaluation. In short, we should proceed from reality and speak with facts. Now is the information age, with the influx of information and the explosion of knowledge, everyone's time is limited, so the article should advocate short. However, this does not mean that the shorter the better. When some reasons are too short and obscure, the length can be appropriately extended. The so-called "appropriateness" means seeking truth from facts, being just right, never deliberately stretching, and winding simple truth around complexity. Accordingly, the evaluation of an article also needs dialectical analysis. The key is to look at the quality, value and readability of the article, rather than sticking to the length. It should also be noted that there are hundreds of articles on different topics. Writing professional articles such as theory, literature, and journalism has its own requirements, and the requirements for writing speeches, speeches, and official documents are also different.