What does classroom homogenization mean?

Question 1: What does it mean to catch up with homogenization competition? This means that everyone teaches the same ideas and goals. No innovation. Get into the same predicament as everyone else

Question 2: What are the characteristics and connotations of a school? The connotation of a school does not have an accurate concept. It should be the quality development relative to scale development, the fine development relative to extensive development, the characteristic development relative to homogenization development, and the innovative development relative to imitation development. In other words, connotative development is a kind of development that pursues quality. It emphasizes improving the quality of running a school, that is, improving the "soft power" of the school.

The school's characteristic is the homogenization of "one thousand schools", that is, every school shows its own style and color from curriculum construction, classroom teaching to scientific management, school culture, from principals to teachers to students, and even the whole school, and shows its own personality and advantages to the outside world. The characteristics of a school have three basic characteristics: one is uniqueness, which embodies the primary characteristics that distinguish a school from other schools, and "no one has me" and "different" are actually the manifestations of uniqueness; The second is high quality, which shows that the level, achievements and quality of the same project are obviously superior to other schools; The third is stability. School characteristics are not a flash in the pan. The characteristics formed in a period of time should be naturally integrated into the education system, school system and education model.

Question 3: What does Internet education mean? Internet education is fixed, which continues the traditional education mode, while educational internet creates a flexible education mode by combining the traditional education mode with the convenience of the network.

However, when describing the future of educational internet, the author still needs to pay attention to several points that conflict with reality:

1. Free and value added. For individuals, free has become one of the labels of the Internet. Free security, free search, free internet access, free WIFI, free office software, etc. The free mode allows enterprises or individuals to invest a lot, but it does not necessarily produce results. Not all people in China are adventurous. It is possible to invest in enterprises, but it is difficult to invest in individuals!

2. Popularization and promotion of online education. China has a vast territory, and the elite of a foreign industry is estimated to be almost the total population of a country. Let's go to online education according to the 20% elite, and that number is still very large. The homogenization of products makes competition more difficult. Can online educators operate easily by their own efforts? Difficult!

3.3 difficulty. P2P interaction. Everyone has the right and freedom to travel and relax. Do you dare to put too much time and energy into something that has been put into a lot but has no great future?

4.UGC mode and elite mode. These two direct influences are the contradiction between public taste and specialized courses. Most of the content produced by UGC model is closely related to people, but it is not professional. The two extremes of content, one is to follow the vulgarization of people, and the other is to guide the specialization of users. The results of these two directions are passive and active, which can be extended to professional courses. The former is easy to bring benefits, while the latter requires extremely high trading ability. What's more, the latter also needs the organic combination of specialization and the Internet. For senior educators in reality, it is too difficult to combine transformation!

5. Immersive learning is really hard to run. People's desire is endless, except for rigid demand, which basically changes with the change of environment and time. If you don't have perseverance or are forced by things, try to learn? Every website on the Internet has conducted in-depth research on people's psychology, and online education lags far behind other mature industries in grasping people's psychological experience. This makes netizens need to overcome the temptation in the network and study for a certain purpose, which is as difficult as brushing blame. This learning process is very difficult!

To sum up, the educational internet must operate under the framework of enterprises or * * *, and it needs the cooperation of educators and educatees, education industry and non-education industry, which is as difficult as building a learning society.

Question 4: Chinese teaching is grounded. Writing can reduce the number of innocent children. When writing a composition, they lie and even indulge in the illusion created by fictional stories. Such abuse obviously plays a "bad" role in shaping citizens' personality and cultivating their individuality.

At present, more than 80% of children can't write a composition, which is related to "more routines and less experience" in composition teaching. There are three reasons why students' compositions are false:

First, that's what the teacher taught me. Homogenization of content, modeling of techniques, seeking stability and equality, and refusing to innovate, there are as many routines to follow as there are "model essays".

Second, this is required by the examination rules. This is like the relationship between exam-oriented education and the baton of college entrance examination. What kind of test composition requirements there are, naturally there will be what kind of student composition pattern. In students' compositions, poetry and whimsy are often stifled by "common sense". Personalized language attempts are obscured by the "sameness" of large class teaching, and the result is a thousand words.

Third, students lack life experience, but they have to write some tall topics. "Nothing to say" is the most reasonable normal. The composition questions that have remained unchanged for decades must be properly balanced, like a duck to water, not to mention that primary school students, even high school students, can only be so "crowded". A high school Chinese teacher who participated in marking the college entrance examination felt that "Tao Yuanming, Su Shi and Sima Qian" basically "lived once" in the college entrance examination every year. In the words of some students, what is the reason that "these three people are called the' Big Three in Routine', but they can solve all problems involving ideals, goals, mentality and responsibilities"? What's strange about students becoming porters of "good words, good sentences and good articles"?

"Articles are written for time, and poems are written for things." It is absurd and understandable that students who live by indirect experience leave papers everywhere in their compositions. Some people say that children lie by writing a composition first. People's collective lying or collective affectation in their compositions obviously hurt not only the "talent" in the literary sense. Children's composition routines are very deep, so we must set up ideas for solving problems. Let Chinese teaching be more relevant, make humanities education more true, good and beautiful, make quality education pay more attention to value and process, and make primary school students' "routine composition" really have medicine.

Question 5: How to understand the "five dimensions" in undergraduate teaching audit and evaluation? At present, there is a widespread problem of homogenization of school-running orientation. Words such as "world-class, domestic first-class, applied, broad caliber and thick foundation" abound, but these words do not really meet the actual needs of schools and countries. Therefore, based on the regional reality, the accumulation of historical traditions of running a school and the realistic foundation of the school, it is the first thing for colleges and universities to refine the orientation of running a school that meets the actual needs and development direction of the school. Only by doing this decisive factor well can we really find our own "ruler".

From another perspective, this is the focus of this round of audit evaluation. The first problem for experts to enter the school is to solve the problem that the school's ruler is not accurate, to help the school adjust its position, to make the school develop in a direction suitable for itself, to highlight its characteristics, to improve the teaching quality and to run a school that the people are satisfied with.