Literary works have the status of being appreciated and perceived to a certain extent, and can be analyzed according to "intentional objects". This theory comes from Ingarden's thought of "pure intentional object", and after appropriate modification, it takes meaning as the object, materializes matter, and finally unifies the two.
Because ideas and consciousness are interdependent, we should combine the key points with consciousness, and then deeply interpret the works.
Literary works will only be regarded as a real object if they have not entered the aesthetic stage and have not been awakened by consciousness. Only when consciousness makes a work alive can it be embodied in the aesthetic process of readers and transformed into an "intentional object". Only the readers' specific aesthetic value can surpass their own artistic value, and this transcendence needs to inject some thoughts and feelings.
Thus, if artistic value really exists, it should be something that exists in the works and is displayed in the works. Aesthetic value will only be revealed when the overall nature of the work is stipulated. On the other hand, artistic value has always existed in the works, and on the surface it may change with the changes of the times, but its internal and external integration will always exist in the works.
Extended data:
Mo Yan, a famous novelist, pointed out at the 20 12 Shanghai Book Fair that literature is irreplaceable by film and television because of its unique aesthetic value. At the same time, the relationship between literature and film and television is very close.
Mo Yan pointed out that although movies, TV series and picture reading now kill most people's spare time, the unique aesthetic value of literature is irreplaceable by film and television. The humorous Mo Yan cited an example of a novel tailored for Zhang Yimou, laughing that the heroine wrote the novel according to Gong Li's appearance and even considered the shooting position. In the end, Zhang Yimou was dissatisfied and felt that the writing was not good.
Mo Yan concluded: "Writers should not be close to the director, but should write according to the laws of novels, leaving the director behind!" However, he did not object to the writer's adaptation of novels and writing plays, but not as a means of making money, but as a sincere artistic creation.
Regarding the relationship between literature and film and television, Mo Yan believes that there is a close relationship between them: "Not to mention that many films are adapted from novels, even if they are created out of thin air without the original script of the novel, they need a literary foundation. The film itself is literature, a good literary script is readable, and a good TV series should also have strong literariness. " If there is no literariness, the artistry of movies will become passive water.
People's Daily Online-Mo Yan: Film and television cannot replace the unique aesthetic value of literature.