The poem "The Monk of Jiao Ran" is completely opposite. Why do poets in the Tang Dynasty like to write such five laws?

Because poets write these poems, they usually write them with the heart to express their feelings. He doesn't pursue these opposing or non-opposing things excessively, but wants to record his feelings at this moment. Therefore, when the ancients wrote poems, they considered their own feelings. If they are in a good mood, then this poem has the meaning he wrote whether it is correct or not. And if this poem is the opposite, but there is no inspiration in the writing situation, then the poem written is not as meaningful as the poem written casually, no matter how fluent it is.

In addition, when they are awake on weekdays, they all want to write the five laws of antithesis, which often makes them feel unconventional. Only by breaking through this routine can they think that they are free and free from secular influences, which is of great significance to them. In addition, in fact, there are many words in poetry that don't rhyme. If forced to rhyme, it may change the original meaning of poetry. In order to protect his work and prevent its meaning from changing greatly, the poet produced these five completely inconsistent laws.

I think this untidiness is actually a recognition of them. After all, people always think that neat things are the best, but not all neat things are the best. But in order not to follow in the footsteps of most people, he did so. He just hopes to promote the culture of this dynasty through his own efforts. I don't want to pass on the cultural prejudice of my ancestors for ten years. In fact, bringing my own innovation in this inheritance is good for the spread of culture.

And when people recite poems, they pay attention to the fluency of their own works. No matter whether the poems are antithetical or not, as long as the works are fluent, they can all be good works, which is also the specific source of these completely incorrect poems.