Second, why the ancients were good at writing metrical poems, because there was nothing to do and the pressure of life was too small.
Many friends who love metrical poetry have been puzzled by this question: How did the ancients master metrical poetry so well? Why don't we remember? Speaking of writing poems and lyrics, I have to move to Fan Wen to write. The answer I gave to this question is absolutely true, because the ancients were idle and thought about it every day. Today, primary school students have to study at least two courses, middle school students have to study six courses, and I studied 39 courses in college. How many courses did Li Bai take in his life? Just one subject, Chinese. Can't he learn well? If you don't believe it, you can lock yourself in a room and master all the skills and business of metrical poetry without a lifetime, three years or three years. But we can't do that. Today's life foundation, life skills, life style and life needs are diversified. These four diversities make it impossible for you and me to recite metrical poems exclusively. There is a saying that learning mathematics and physics is not afraid to travel all over the world. Listen, you have to take three courses. Where is Li Bai? You can travel all over the world by taking one course. You can also ask Yang Guifei to learn ink for her and Gao Lishi to take off her shoes. There are many cows and the effect is good. That was the characteristic of that era. How can it be today?
Third, how did the ancients write metrical poems? Is metrical poetry really as strict as we thought? Can't we cross the line?
The ancients didn't regard their poems as perfect works of art at first, they just wrote them according to the music and recitation effect at that time. The most important problem is that they are not easy to read, which was the highest artistic skill at that time. Later, many idle people, unable to write good poems themselves, went to study poems written by others. Found a lot of patterns. That is, the excellent works of the ancients all have the same poetic mechanism. So some people came up with seven methods, seven unique techniques, even lines, rhyme corners, Huanxisha and Yu Meiren. Then they talk nonsense everywhere. Someone wrote him a poem. He looked at it, compared it with his own research results and found some. That's what it says. The man went home and wrote another article as he said, so that he could read it. He said, oh, you have paid attention to everything I said, which is similar to what Li Bai wrote. Flat and even, strict rules, can be published. In the long run, the strict requirements of ancient metrical poems were set by these people. So here we can ask a question: Who did Li Bai learn to write from? What is it based on? Here, I can also say so arrogantly: With regard to any requirement of China's ancient metrical poems, we can find the other in the long river of poems. And the artistic effect of these poems is very good. I won't say even rhyme angle, there are too many such examples. Let me talk about the problem of "saving the quarrel" I will talk about the mechanism and examples together. What does "+0" mean? 5438 "One is full of words, which is not harmonious and beautiful. Another reason is that it is a fixed format, inconsistent and flat. The first is science, and the second is nonsense word games. However, whether in the past or in ancient times, when it comes to saving quarrels, we always talk about the second one. It seems that if we don't save this quarrel, it will be like coming from the ruins. Look at Su Dongpo's sentence "How many heroes are there at a time" and his sentence "Return a bottle to the moon", both of which are "occasionally". Who saved who? Cong Yi, dare you say that this poem is not well written? I dare you. (Note: According to the rules, this sentence should be "* ping * ping", and * can be flat. ) 2. "This sentence saves one, saves three, saves two and saves four. But we also learned that "135 doesn't matter, 246 is clear", since 135 doesn't matter. Paradoxically, such examples account for more than 20% of metrical poems. I don't know who came up with this rule. 3. The expressions of "particularly level" and "some difficult words can't be saved" are despicable and satisfactory slogans for people who are idle and unable to justify themselves. If you ask me, as long as it sounds good, nothing can be saved. Pranks can only lead to more disharmony. This problem is not a problem of changing from negative to positive. The problem is that Washington cut down a tree and said it was cut by his cousin. He did two things wrong in a row. Su Dongpo usually takes the original rhyme first and then Su Dongpo. Xin Qiji's nineteen poems are all. I have always thought that Xin Qiji's ci and art are the highest in ancient times, but I can't beat him on the whole, but I look down on him very much. Can't you learn from others' Dongpo, forge ahead and innovate boldly? In Li Qingzhao's On Ci, I don't think Li Qingzhao understands Su Dongpo. His content comes first, no matter what the rules are. Su Dongpo is a manufacturer of awkward sentences and also engages in wholesale. However, I can't see his language, vigorous and simple, fresh and simple, very close to nature without carving. How nice! It seems that women will never understand men, even a great woman like Li Qingzhao.