The first category (50-4 1), the second category (40-3 1), the third category (30-2 1) and the fourth category (20-0).
Meet the meaning of the question, meet the meaning of the question, basically meet the meaning of the question, deviate from the meaning of the question.
The center is prominent, the center is clear, the center is basically clear, the center is unknown or the thinking is improper.
The content is substantial, the content is thin, and there is nothing.
True feelings, true feelings, basic true feelings, false feelings.
Strict structure, complete structure, basically complete structure, and chaotic structure.
Language fluency, language fluency, basic fluency, and many diseases.
The font is neat, the handwriting is clear, the handwriting is scrawled, and the handwriting is difficult to distinguish.
Meet the stylistic requirements, generally meet the stylistic requirements, generally meet the stylistic requirements, but do not meet the stylistic requirements.
Development level 20 points
Profound, rich, literary and innovative.
1, penetrating into the essence through phenomena 4, rich materials 7, vivid language, flexible sentence pattern 10, novel conception, fresh materials and ingenious conception.
2. Reveal and generate problems. Full image 8. Good at using rhetorical devices 1 1. Reasoning and imagination are unique.
This view is very enlightening. 6. The artistic conception is profound. 9. The sentence has the meaning of 12, and has individual characteristics.
[Description] 1. The basic grade scores focus on meaning, content, language and style, and are comprehensively measured. Meeting the stylistic requirements refers to meeting the stylistic requirements selected by candidates according to the meaning and content of the questions. 2. The development grade score is based on 12, which is not comprehensive. Those who stand out from others will be graded equally until they reach full marks. 3. Deduct 2 points for missing topics; 65438+ 0 points will be deducted for each typo, and 5 points will be deducted until repetition is not counted; If the number of words is less than 2/3, every 50 words will be deducted 1 minute.
4. If the article meets the requirements of "three basics" (the center is basically clear, the structure is basically complete, and the language is basically fluent), then the cut is divided into 52 points. On this basis, as long as a bright spot is found, the score will be raised.
First, about argumentative writing.
1. On the premise of meeting the meaning of the topic, all argumentative papers with basic reasoning, outstanding viewpoints and substantial materials can be graded according to 48-52 points.
2. Where a certain aspect of the "three basics" reaches a good level, the score can be increased by one level, and so on.
3. For argumentative essays that express ideas and expound opinions with the help of short essays, miscellaneous feelings and even essays, we should read them repeatedly and carefully assign points. Those excellent articles that are profound in thought, vivid in exposition and balanced in all aspects should dare to score high marks until full marks: those articles with pale thoughts, plain exposition and lack of hierarchy can not misjudge high marks only by essays or essays, but can only be graded according to the standard of general exposition.
4. Considering the idea of discussing articles, most of them are articles explaining "tips" (materials). Therefore, anything that can cut into the "material" from a relatively novel angle and explain the connotation and spirit of "hint" is a bright spot, which will increase two grades to add points. 5. Because most discussion articles tend to give simple examples and use more cases, any of the following scenes can be regarded as a bright spot and can be judged by 62 points: choose relatively novel, vivid and personalized materials as arguments instead of the well-known "common cases"; The case materials used can be demonstrated at different levels, without plane expansion and mechanical repetition, and each case can show a small argument or step by step.
Second, about narrative.
1. On the premise of meeting the meaning of the topic, all narratives with basically satisfactory narrative expression, prominent theme and complete plot can be scored by 48-52 points.
2. Where a certain aspect, such as expression, theme or storyline, reaches a good level, the score can be raised by one level, and so on. Those who have reached an excellent level in a certain aspect, or are ingenious in conception, full in image and far-reaching in artistic conception, or have a very distinctive personality, or are very proficient in language, can be awarded points upwards according to 63 points, and the best can reach 70 points.
3. Any article below the "three basics" level should also float downwards according to one or several aspects of its expression, theme and plot. Anyone who is poor in any aspect will be down by 42 points. For articles with low language expression and narrative ability, the maximum score is no more than 35 points.
4. The whole narrator or story will be regarded as irrelevant, and the score will be below 24 points. Unable to judge, can be submitted to the group leader or expert group.
5. Considering that most narratives are simple in plot and lack of connotation, we should focus on the following aspects: witty conception, vivid characters, eye-catching "stories", rich flavor of life and thought-provoking "aftertaste". Such an excellent article can be typed up from 63 points.
Third, matters needing attention
1. On the whole, the scoring method of evaluating the whole item by item is adopted. That is to say, when marking papers, we should comprehensively consider the concept, content, language, style or basic level and development level, but in the end we submit a total score.
2. Pay attention to stylistic awareness. Discuss the article, the discussion text must be more than 2/3; Narrative, narrative must be more than 2/3. Otherwise, it is regarded as unclear style and given appropriate demotion.
3. Anything written in other styles, as long as it is not poetry, will be scored normally. If you write a poem in violation of the requirements of the proposition, the upper limit shall not exceed 5 points.
4. The number of words after writing the article is insufficient. After the normal score, the number of words will be deducted. Deduct 1 minute for every 50 words until 3 points are deducted. Obviously unfinished articles, the maximum score is not more than 35 points. For unfinished articles, insufficient words will no longer be deducted.
5. Deduct 1 point for every three misspelled words, and deduct 5 points until repeated words are not counted.
6. The score mentioned in the homework is usually 3 points.
7. Plagiarism is confirmed. After verification, more than 2/3 words are the same as published works, with a maximum score of 5.
8. Younger, too shabby and tasteless language should be below the cut-in score. Articles with vivid language image, charm and rich cultural connotation should be given points. Specifically:
Pay special attention to the highlights of the narrative in the following aspects:
Have quite clever ideas; Have a distinct character image; There are real and touching life stories; Have distinct personality characteristics; Have far-reaching artistic conception; There is considerable language to express wisdom.
Pay special attention to discussing the highlights of the article in the following aspects:
Very ambitious; You can choose relatively novel, vivid and personalized materials as factual arguments; Demonstration has a sense of hierarchy and three-dimensionality; The language of discussion has logical and cultural connotations.