First, the score that is inconsistent with the film performance is that young people lack awe of history.
But to my great surprise, a platform rating of this movie is only 7.6. According to my understanding, this movie should be 9 points better than the domestic movie Farewell My Concubine.
When I want to score a five and click the mouse, I can't help but breathe a sigh of relief. People in their 40 s who watch movies like me may have accounts for social software and short video software, but they basically don't register such comments. Bringing home the bacon is not easy. How can they have too much time to play and film? To some extent, people who are deeply moved by this film have no right to score. I can only sigh that among the 165438+ 10,000 people, those who hit less than 4 stars are basically young people who can't understand the battle of Changjin Lake and lack awe in the history of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea.
A ten-year-old boy was watching a movie and asked his father nearby if the movie was about War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression. And the father next to him is still wiping his tears. After drying my tears, I told my children that this is to resist US aggression and aid Korea, and times are different.
Children in grade three should have studied history. But I know nothing about the First World War after the founding of the People's Republic of China, which is quite terrible. Children in the third and fourth grades play film reviews and play live broadcasts smoothly. In the eyes of these children, it seems that they deserve everything. What about five years and ten years later? Not to mention them, even after 1990 and 2000, a large part of them have basically no understanding of the history of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea.
Second, is the war scene in Changjin Lake a restoration of history?
It is exasperating that I also saw another person's film review. It is ridiculous to try to measure the success or failure of a film by documentary standards.
But is the movie really exaggerated? Don't! I personally don't think so. Take the bomb as an example. In 20 19, Germany found an unexploded bomb, which directly blocked the 500-meter area and evacuated 6500 people.
1000-pound (500 kg) aerial bomb was the most used by the US military in World War II, which was still the case during the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, but there were also 2,000-pound aerial bombs. Professionals say that the 500 kg bomb has only 2 10 kg of charge, and the remaining 290 kg are shells and fuses. There must be a lot of debris. Basically, nothing grows within 100 meters, and the kilometer range may be destroyed. Although it can be seen in the film that the effect of bomb explosion is a special effect, it is not exaggerated.
The picture shows1950165438+1October15th, the US Navy's AD-3 dive bomber dropped 2,000 pounds of aerial bombs to bomb the North Korean side of the Yalu River Bridge. This is a photo of the Korean War released by the United States. Do you still think the bomb is weak?
The only feeling is that in order to pursue a beautiful scene in the movie, the formation of charged volunteers is exaggerated, and the war will not be so intensive, especially when the enemy's heavy firepower is more fierce.
Third, in the case of weapons substitution, how much did the volunteers pay for the victory of the battle of Changjin Lake?
For so many years, whenever I watch history books, film and television dramas or documentaries to resist US aggression and aid Korea, my first reaction is how far apart the weapons between China and the United States are.
In the early days of entering the DPRK, the volunteers did not have the right to airspace, and the sky was completely the home of the US military. This situation only improved after the Soviet Union began to support it in the later period. However, it can be said that in the battle of Changjin Lake, the volunteers relied on flesh and blood and outdated guns to grind away the US military bit by bit.
In addition to air superiority, the tanks used by the United Nations Army mainly include M24 Fei Xia, M26 Pershing, M4A3E8 Super Sherman, Sun Chulun, Churchill, Cromwell and other dazzling land vehicles.
In the Korean War, the US military piled up a mountain of shells, and I don't need to say where the shells went.
As an artistic exaggeration, the film shows that the volunteers played by Jason Wu and Jerry Lee can drive tanks against enemy tanks, which is unlikely in the early days of entering the DPRK. According to historical records, only 42 people from the first four armies of the Volunteers participated in the war and only taught abstract theory. Obviously, the Ninth Army (including the 20th Army, 26th Army and 27th Army) where the Seventh Company is located has never taught in kind. At this time, the volunteers relied more on anti-tank grenades and cluster grenades to destroy the movement of tanks by bombing tracks. This method can only be delivered by manpower. To put it bluntly, it is to trade your life for tanks.
China, as a country that dares to face the substitution of weapons, make moves and win in modern history, is unique at present. Another Saddam who dared to shoot was hanged by the United States.
Fourth, in order not to more clearly reflect the domestic full support for the volunteers.
When the country was just established and everything was ready, an overseas operation was carried out, and the amount of materials needed was unimaginable. However, the film only reflects this problem in a short space.
According to the data, during the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, the people of the whole country provided 5.6 million tons of various war materials to the front. At this time, the domestic people are frugal and supply the front line. If more is added to the plot, the film will be fuller.
Even so, the volunteers can't get a lot of rations because they really can't. The US military can use planes and artillery to block traffic and interrupt the supply of volunteers. Moreover, every time we launch an offensive, the volunteers can only persist for seven days because of the supply problem. Our army's offensive was called "the seven-day offensive" by the US military. This weakness was discovered by Li Qiwei and was basically used by the US military at the end of the Korean War.
The armies of China and the United States have become very similar.
China and the United States have different views on this war, but both armies have grown into each other's appearance. One is "afraid of insufficient firepower" and the other is "afraid of fighting at night".
During the war, China encountered a problem of insufficient firepower, which was suppressed by the United Nations artillery fire and could only resist intermittently. According to the information, a heavy brigade of our army has 80 tanks, 120 infantry fighting vehicles, 36 self-propelled guns and 155 rocket launchers. However, a heavy brigade of the US military only has 58 tanks, 140 infantry fighting vehicles and 16 self-propelled artillery. If one day, the generation gap in equipment is completely disappeared, leveled and updated, then our army's firepower will inevitably exceed that of the US military.
In the process of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea, in order to reduce losses, our army basically fought at night, which also made the US military suffer from "night war phobia". Since then, the US military has vigorously developed night vision equipment and carried out various special operations, all of which are inseparable from night vision equipment. According to the data, a light infantry company with 140 personnel, 40 monocular low-light-level night vision devices, 22 binocular low-light-level night vision devices, 69 single-soldier enhanced thermal imagers, 2 6 1 displacement thermal imagers, and a total of 192 large vehicle-mounted thermal imagers, with an average of 1.3. Even the modern warfare of the US military likes to attack at night, and Saddam and bin Laden are planted on it.
This photo was taken by the night vision device of the US Army in 20 15. Does it still look black?
Look at the chaos in Iraq and Syria now, and think about life in China now. Without volunteers, the United States would be too hurt to fight. Will there be a peaceful environment now? Children who can't understand the battle of Changjin Lake should read more history books.