How to evaluate the ideological content of the article and the author's views and attitudes

Evaluating the ideological content of the article and the author's viewpoint and attitude refers to making an appropriate evaluation of the ideological content of the article and the author's viewpoint and attitude on the basis of correct understanding and grasp. Compared with identifying and screening the important information in the article, analyzing and summarizing the main points and central ideas of the article, analyzing the structural level and expression form of the article, and analyzing and summarizing the reading requirements of the author's views and attitudes in the article, the biggest feature of the evaluation of the test center is the subjective evaluation of the "existing things" in the article. The conclusion is not inherent in the original text, but something added subjectively by the reader. Other requirements of modern text reading are to understand, select, analyze and synthesize the "existing" things in the article, and draw objective conclusions. Therefore, "evaluation" has broken through the simple understanding of the meaning and content of words and entered the highest realm of reading ability. It needs the individual participation of readers more than other abilities and is more subjective. Candidates' critical thinking ability and creative ability have also been more fully demonstrated here. "Evaluation" is based on in-depth reading, and its ultimate goal is to apply what you have learned. Through rational thinking and aesthetic judgment, we have a deep feeling and understanding of pros and cons, right and wrong, thus enhancing the awareness of evaluation and improving the level of appreciation. The premise and basis of evaluation is accurate (extreme), profound (superficial), comprehensive (one-sided) and objective (hypothetical) evaluation of the author's viewpoint and attitude analysis and understanding, while evaluation is to comment at a higher level. So pay attention to: specific analysis. Both analysis and evaluation must be closely combined with the reality of literary works to avoid rambling analysis without the works, or infinitely exaggerating some guesses and unconfirmed materials. An objective evaluation. We should give an objective and fair evaluation of the ideological content and the writer's attitude expressed in the works, that is, we should analyze and evaluate the works with correct thinking as the theoretical basis, dialectical method as the basic analytical method, and the unique artistic laws of literary works, rather than arbitrarily commenting on personal likes and dislikes. In the concrete evaluation, social background, the writer's life thought and the actual creation of his works are all important factors that must be considered. Historical evaluation. The analysis and evaluation of classical literary works and foreign literary works should proceed from the reality of social history, rather than forcing the ancients and foreign writers with today's point of view.