The world is knowable. In fact, this is an attitude.
No matter how you look at the world, the world is there. Knownness is self-confident, believing that even though our current knowledge is not enough, we personally firmly believe that the world is knowable. As long as humans continue to develop, we will be able to grasp the laws of the world.
Agnosticism is self-effacing and believes that we cannot completely grasp the world. We can only experience experiences and feelings, as well as some incomplete laws.
No one can give you the answer to whether the world is knowable or unknowable. For agnostics, no matter how cognitive development develops, the world can be considered unknowable. For the agnostic, even if cognitive development has stalled, he remains confident.
Personally, I feel that this is the subject's attitude towards the objective world, and it is the same when it comes to a person.
Wrong views
As for the theory of knowledge, another wrong statement needs to be corrected: "There are only things in the world that are not known, and there are no things that can never be known." This It went to the other extreme. The statement quoted at the beginning of this article misunderstands knowability, but the statement itself is correct.
Since the world is infinite and develops infinitely, but human cognition is always limited, why can’t there be things that can never be cognized? In fact, while materialists emphasize the theory of knowability, they do not deny the existence of the unknown world. Since the world cannot be both knowable and unknowable, this statement should be revised to: "There are only things that are not known in the world. There is nothing that cannot be known.”
Since humans can think and explore, every step of scientific development has confirmed the theory of knowledge.