Although this person studied with the last one, his grades were not as good as that. Some people say that his intelligence is not as good as his last one? Answer: Not so.
Original: Qiu Yi, a domestic excellent player. Let Qiu Yi teach two people to play chess, one to concentrate on playing chess, and Qiu Yi listens; Although one person thought it was a swan, he tried to shoot it with his bow. Although I learned chess from the previous one, chess is still not as good as the previous one. Is it because his intelligence is not as good as the former? That's not true.
Extended data
The full text ***5 sentences, divided into three layers. Concise and well-founded. Mainly through comparison, it is written that when two people have the same teacher, the same learning environment and the same intelligence, because of different learning attitudes (one of them listens attentively to Qiu; Although a person listened, he thought it was a swan. He tried to help it, which led to different learning results.
The author reasoned with stories. From the perspective of learning, it is about learning attitude. Only with concentration, concentration and wholehearted heart can things be done well.
Back to the text, what I said here is not only learning attitude, but also learning goals.
Imagine why the first person can "concentrate" because he has a clear goal, "only listen to autumn" and learn chess from the best players.
Another person, listening to the class for a while and thinking "the swan is coming" for a while, doesn't know what to do, which leads to the learning effect is not as good as the previous one. Different learning performances reflect different learning attitudes, but the most fundamental thing is that the learning objectives are unclear.