Debate Speech 1
(Debaters take their seats)
Dear teacher, dear classmates, tonight everyone good. This is the scene of the third preliminary round of the first "College Debate Competition" at the Beihai Campus of XXX University of Science and Technology. I am the executive chairman of this competition.
In order for this competition to proceed smoothly, the debaters can perform at their ideal level. Before the game starts, please set your mobile phone and other communication tools to vibrate or mute.
Let me announce the rules of the venue:
1. Do not interrupt the debaters at will during the debate.
2. Personal attacks are not allowed, and both debaters must respect each other.
3. Except for saying "Hello, judges and classmates" at the beginning of the debate, the rest can be omitted.
4. During the competition, the debater’s position cannot be changed.
5. When the two sides of the debate are having a head-on confrontation, one side must sit down after finishing speaking. After the other side has finished speaking, the debater of that side must stand up before speaking.
6. When each debate reaches the last 30 seconds, sound and placard prompts will be given. After the time is over, the executive chairman will announce the end.
7. Both debaters have limited time in each session. Please control your applause as much as possible to avoid affecting the performance of the debaters.
Now let me introduce to you all the judges present today. They are __________________________________________________________________________________. Let us welcome them with warm applause. I believe that through the debaters’ debate and analysis, we will definitely be able to bring a different result to everyone.
Let me introduce to you both sides of today’s debate. The person sitting on my right now is the debater of the affirmative, who is from the representative team. Their point of view is "". Sitting on my left are the opposing debaters, representing the representative team. Their point of view is " ". Now let’s ask the debaters from each team to introduce themselves. First, please invite the affirmative, and then please invite the negative.
Let us wait and see what the final result will be! Now I announce that this debate has officially begun.
The competition is divided into 5 links:
The first link: Argument establishment and refutation stage.
a. First of all, please ask the first defender of the affirmative to make an opening argument, and the speaking time will be three minutes.
b. The second argument of the opposing side is invited to refute the first argument of the affirmative side. Arguments are not allowed during this period, and the speaking time is one minute and thirty seconds.
c. Next, the opposing side will be asked to make an opening argument, and the speaking time will be three minutes.
d. The second argument of the affirmative side is invited to refute the first argument of the negative side. Arguments are not allowed during this period, and the speaking time is one minute and thirty seconds.
(After the pro and con parties have finished speaking, they can talk about some topics related to the pro and con arguments in a short and concise manner. Remember not to focus on only one side)
Thank you to both sides for their wonderful speeches. Next is the second part of the debate →
The attack and defense stage.
At this stage, the attacker asks questions and the defense answers. The person selected to answer the question may not avoid the question, but may ask rhetorical questions, with both sides speaking alternately. The questioner and the questioner will each have one minute and thirty seconds to speak. After one party's time is up, the other party can continue to speak or indicate abstention. First, ask the three defenders of the affirmative side to ask questions, and choose the third or fourth defense defense of the negative side to answer;
Next, ask the three negative defenders to ask questions, and choose the third or fourth defense of the affirmative side to answer; Next, invite the fourth defender of the affirmative side to ask questions, You can choose to answer the three or four defenses of the negative side. Next, ask the fourth defense of the negative side to ask questions. You can choose the three or four defenses of the affirmative side to answer.
Any debater from the opposing side will give a summary of the attack and defense, and the speaking time will be one minute and thirty seconds. Any debater on the affirmative side will give a summary of the attack and defense, and the speaking time will be one minute and thirty seconds.
Thanks to both parties for their wonderful arguments. Next is the most exciting part of the debate →
The third part: the free debate stage.
In this link, both parties take turns to speak. First, the cumulative time spent by each party shall not exceed 5 minutes. Each team can only speak by one debater at a time. When any debater stands up, it is deemed that the debater has spoken. When he sits down, the debater is deemed to have finished speaking, and the other team begins to speak. Secondly, after one party's time is up, the other party can continue to speak or indicate abstention. (If one party has been in a head-on confrontation with the opponent's debater, and the debater of that side has been standing up, the moderator should prompt: "When the two sides of the debate are in a head-to-head confrontation, one party must sit down after finishing speaking, and wait for the other party to speak. After that, the debater of that side will stand up before speaking.")
First, any debater from the affirmative side is invited to start (speak).
Thanks to both parties for the wonderful debate, the next step is the debate →
The fourth link: the concluding statement stage. First, please invite any debater from the opposing side to make a concluding statement, which will last 4 minutes.
Thanks to ___ from the negative side for his wonderful speech. Next, any debater from the affirmative side will be invited to make a final speech, which will last 4 minutes.
Thanks to the affirmative for his wonderful speech, next is the debate →
The fifth link: the judges’ question stage (no time limit).
Invite judges (gesture by hand as a courtesy). Thank you to the judges for their wonderful questions. Next is the time for the judges to leave to evaluate the results. Please ask the staff to collect the judges' score sheets. The selection results will be announced later.
While waiting for the selection results, the audience sitting here must have their own opinions or doubts about today’s debate topic and the debaters’ answers just now. In the following audience question and answer session, the debaters will not Can avoid problems. Please raise your hands so I can see you. (If there is one student who has been asking questions during this session, and no other students who raised their hands are given the opportunity to answer questions, the host can say, "The question asked by this student is very sharp, but I hope you can give other students the opportunity to ask questions.") Students who have questions will have a chance to hear their thoughts, okay?”) After fair selection by the judges, the results of this debate have come out:
Let me announce it to everyone. The selection results of this debate competition:
The winner of this competition: The best debater of this competition:
Debate Speech 2
Debate Eloquence Principles
Arguments are an important part of litigation. Except for individual cases, lawyers participate in litigation arguments. The lawyer's position in litigation is different from that of other litigation participants and has its own particularities. In addition to following the basic principles of various lawsuits, lawyers' eloquence in argumentation also has its own unique principles. These principles are:;
First, the principle of seeking truth from facts.
Seeking truth from facts is one of the basic ideological lines and fine traditions of our country’s party and government work. The principle of seeking truth from facts is also one of the basic principles that our country’s lawyers should abide by. Lawyers' argumentative eloquence should adhere to this principle. The principle of seeking truth from facts requires lawyers to seek truth from facts during debate activities, based on objectively existing facts, and not to falsify facts, exaggerate facts, or conceal or reduce facts.
Second, debate the principle in accordance with the law.
Arguing in accordance with the law is also a principle that lawyers should abide by when arguing eloquently. It contains the following main contents: (1) It is the right of lawyers to participate in debates, and lawyers must exercise their right to debate in accordance with the law. (2) During the debate, lawyers must perform certain obligations in accordance with the law. Lawyers must also perform any debate obligations that parties are required to perform by law. (3) The analysis made or the opinions put forward by lawyers during the debate must comply with legal provisions and have a legal basis.
Third, the principle of safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned.
This principle means that lawyers should protect the legitimate rights and interests of the entrusted parties. According to this principle, parties can ask lawyers to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, and lawyers should also take the initiative to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of clients. Lawyers protect the legitimate rights and interests of their clients through various channels and methods, among which eloquence in debate is a major aspect.
Fourth, debate the principle of equality.
This principle is the guideline for lawyers to conduct defense activities. It includes the following main contents: (1) The debate status of both parties is equal. (2) The debating status of both lawyers and the parties is equal, and the opportunities for debating are also equal. (3) The debating status between lawyers on both sides is also equal.
Fifth, safeguard the principle of national sovereignty.
This principle is a guideline that Chinese lawyers must abide by in foreign-related debates. According to our country's legal provisions, Chinese lawyers can serve as agents of foreign parties in foreign-related litigation.
In this case, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties is consistent with safeguarding the sovereign interests of the country. The legality of the rights and interests of foreign parties mentioned here includes: (1) They must be rights and interests recognized and protected by our country’s domestic laws; (2) They must be rights and interests recognized and protected by international treaties signed by our country’s government; (3) ) must be rights recognized and protected by international practices recognized by our government. When Chinese lawyers meet the above three situations when conducting foreign-related debates, they are safeguarding our country's sovereignty. If the interests of foreign parties do not meet the above circumstances, our lawyers should not defend them.
Debate Speech 3
Please keep the scene quiet, our debate competition is about to begin.
(Quiet down) Hello everyone, this is the site of the xxxx (theme) debate competition. Welcome everyone. The theme of this debate is "xxxxxxxxxx".
Let me introduce to you the judges present here. They are———— Next, I will introduce to you the debaters from both sides of this debate. The debater for the affirmative is composed of xx composed of representatives.
They are respectively the first defense of the affirmative xxx, the second defense of the affirmative————(the specific introduction can be ignored if it is an informal large-scale competition, and it shall be based on the specific requirements of the superior). Their views are————the same as above for the negative side Now I announce that the x session of the xx debate competition of xx school has officially begun.
Let’s enter the first stage: (Just follow the instructions below, and arrange the time according to your outline requirements)
(1) Opening Statement Stage Now, please ask the affirmative to speak, the time is 2 minutes and 30 seconds. [Indicates that the first defense of the affirmative side will speak] [Speak after finishing speaking] Next, please invite the first defense of the negative side to speak, the time is 2 minutes and 30 seconds
(2) Attack and defense stage (the public defense time is 6 minutes, each team has 3 minutes)< /p>
1. For the second defense of the affirmative side, choose the second or third defense of the negative side and conduct a one-on-one public defense for 1 minute and 30 seconds
2. For the second defense of the negative side, choose the second or third defense of the affirmative side and conduct a one-to-one public defense The first public defense lasts for 1 minute and 30 seconds
3. For the three defenses of the affirmative side, choose the second or third defense of the negative side for one-on-one public defense for 1 minute and 30 seconds
4. For the third defense of the negative side, choose the affirmative side The second or third defense will be a one-on-one public defense for 1 minute and 30 seconds 5. Summary of the first defense of the affirmative side for 1 minute and 30 seconds
6. Summary of the first defense of the negative side for 1 minute and 30 seconds. Attack and defense rules:
① The questioner controls the question time, can ask reasonable and clear questions related to the topic, and can stop the respondent's answer at any time
② During the defense time, the questioner can. When asking questions, you are not allowed to make your own comments or make any extensions to the results of the inquiry. Otherwise, it will be considered a violation. When answering any question raised by the interrogator, but the question is obviously unreasonable, the respondent may explain the reason and refuse to answer.
④The respondent may ask the interrogator to restate his or her question, but this cannot be done maliciously. Otherwise, it will be deemed as a violation.
⑤The respondent shall not ask the interrogator, otherwise it will be deemed as a violation.
⑥When the respondent raises a counter-question, the interrogator may ask him to stop. Refuse to answer
(3) Free debate stage (the opposing side starts first) (the debate time is 8 minutes, each team’s accumulated time is 4 minutes)
1. The opposing side takes 4 minutes in total
p>2. The affirmative has a total of 4 minutes of free debate. Rules:
①The total free debate time is 8 minutes, and each team has 4 minutes.
②Free. Debates must be conducted alternately.
When the free debate begins, any member of the opposing side should stand up to speak. After that, any member of the positive side should speak immediately, and the two sides will take turns to speak until the time of both sides is used up.
③ During the free debate time, the order, frequency and time of each debater’s speech are not limited
④ When a team has 30 minutes left to speak. seconds, there will be one whistle. When the team's speaking time runs out, there will be two whistles, and the team should stop speaking immediately.
⑤ If one team's speaking time expires. has been used up and cannot speak. If the other team still has time left, the debaters of that team can continue to speak until the team's time runs out.
⑥ Free debate is a test of the overall cooperation of a team. Ability and an important stage of each debater's strength.
Debates should make full use of this time to strengthen their arguments concisely and clearly, and refute the other party's arguments tactfully and forcefully. Speech errors, empty games, etc. will affect the team's results.
(4) In the summary statement stage, the four opposing sides will make their concluding statements for 3 minutes, and the four affirmative arguments will make their concluding statements for 3 minutes.
(5) Questions from the audience
1. Each team can be asked questions by 3 spectators, and each spectator can only ask 1 question
2. Questions raised by the audience must be related to the topic and are reasonable questions 3. When the question is unreasonable, the respondent You can refuse to answer, and this audience will be disqualified from asking questions, but the opportunity to ask questions will still continue, and this opportunity will be left to other audiences
(6) Judges’ statistical results and comments
(7) Hosting Someone announces the results of the game
(8) The host announces the end of the game.
Debate Speech 4
Dear teachers, judges, dear students, hello everyone!
Welcome to the Student Union of No. 14 Middle School The scene of the debate competition hosted by
Before the competition begins, I first announce the venue discipline and competition rules:
1. Speech stage: We advocate impromptu speeches and use appropriate quotations from classics. In the submission stage, the first debate of both parties will make their arguments. The first debate of both parties will make arguments first, and then the second and third debates of both sides will refute the other side's point of view and make supplementary submissions to their own point of view
2. Closing argument stage: The time is 3 minutes, and both sides will make closing arguments
3. Other matters needing attention:
1. Do not hit the subject randomly during the debate Judge others' words;
2. Do not make personal attacks;
3. Respect the judgment of the chairman and judges;
4. We encourage debaters to use Mandarin. Appropriate points will be given to those who use Mandarin;
5. Except for the first argument where you must say "Chairman, judges, hello everyone" at the beginning of the debate, the rest can be omitted
6. During the debate , debaters can use props, charts and objects as auxiliary means to strengthen their speech
7. During the competition, the debater's position cannot be changed
This debate competition The debate question is: Do you suffer disadvantages by being an upright and honest person?
Pro: You do not suffer disadvantages by being an upright and honest person
Negative: You do not suffer disadvantages by being an upright and honest person.
Now let me introduce the two sides of today’s debate
Pro: One debater: Two debaters: Three debaters: Four debaters:
Opposition : First debater: Second debater: Third debater: Fourth debater:
Moderator: Next, the debate begins. First, we welcome the first debater of the affirmative to speak, which will last 4 minutes
Moderator: Okay, just now the affirmative side made a statement on its own point of view. Now let’s see how the opposition side breaks down the topic. Please give the opposition side one speech. The time is also 4 minutes!
Moderator : Thanks for the wonderful presentation of the first defense of the opposing side
After the first round of wonderful debate, both the pros and cons are well-founded and they are bound to win. Now let the pros and cons make rebuttal statements to each other. The total number of each team ***8 minutes
Moderator: The arguments just delivered by the debaters from both sides were very exciting. They were both determined to win, and the fourth debater from each side will make a summary. Statements are often even more important. We will start with the four counter-arguments, and the time is 3 minutes!
Moderator: Thank you! Now we will ask the four pros and cons to make a concluding statement for the affirmative, and the time is also 3 minutes!
Moderator: Before the score is announced, please let the judges and guest speakers comment on today’s debate. Everyone is welcome
Moderator: Now I will announce the debaters for this competition. They are: The debaters of team Fang won this competition, and they are also our champion team of this competition:
Moderator: Okay, thank you debaters for your wonderful debate
< p> Debate Speech 5The external components of debate eloquence
The external components of debate eloquence mainly include language (voice, diction), posture (expression, demeanor), psychology (Specific applications of psychological laws) and others (space applications), etc.
(1) Language?
The language used by lawyers to argue refers to audio language, that is, oral expression. Lawyers should pay attention to the scientific and artistic nature of audio language. Scientificity refers to the composition mechanism of spoken language - the rules of language use. Artistry refers to the way and techniques used in spoken language. The former is unique to audio languages, while a considerable part of the latter is common to audio languages ??and written languages.
①Speech
From a stylistic analysis, spoken language is spoken language. Although oral expression is accompanied by a large number of expressions and movements, voice is the first communicative form of oral expression. As a spoken expression, court argumentation should of course attach great importance to the study and application of pronunciation.
Lawyer debates pay attention to the beauty of the voice. The harmonious unity of good debate content and good speech form will form a special force and enable the debate to achieve good results.
The speech forms of court debates mainly include timbre, stress and intonation, rhythm, etc.
Tone. Any kind of spoken expression has a minimum requirement for its material material - voice, which is correct, clear and pleasant to the ear.
Lawyer debates are no exception. The pronunciation and writing of Chinese are not one-to-one equivalent, because local regions differ, resulting in pronunciation differences (dialects) that are a common phenomenon in Chinese. In order to avoid auditory confusion and misunderstanding for the audience, lawyers should pay attention to the pronunciation of their voices when arguing, and strive to be correct, clear, and as pleasant as possible.
Lawyers should use Mandarin when debating, and the use of Mandarin plays an important role in special court debates. A person's natural timbre has innate factors, but acquired power can change it to a certain extent.
Learning the correct pronunciation method to make the tone beautiful and pleasant can greatly enhance the power of language expression.
Stress and intonation. Language is a tool for expressing people's thoughts and feelings. The emphasis on thoughts and feelings, in spoken expressions, is the stress on the sounds of the language. Without stress, the key points of thoughts and feelings cannot be expressed in spoken language. Intonation (tone) is also one of the speech forms that expresses various thoughts and feelings. The correct and appropriate use of stress and intonation can enhance the emotional color of language, form a harmonious and pleasant language, highlight the center of expression, and play the role of emphasis and persuasion.
Lawyers debate right and wrong, praise and blame very clearly. The correct and appropriate use of pronunciation stress and intonation skills will be of great help to lawyers in debates. Rhythm. Rhythm is also an important component of speaking skills. Oral expressions are tense and relaxed, urgent and slow, interrupted and continuous, ups and downs, which is very important for lawyers to argue. Slow but not urgent will keep the audience in a state of relaxation and inhibition, distracting their attention and losing their energy, thus affecting the expression effect. With the ups and downs of thoughts and feelings, it is necessary to have tension and relaxation, and a combination of relaxation and relaxation; to adjust the speed according to the needs of expression, to achieve fast and slow, appropriate speed and slowness, and alternating fast and slow, which are the needs of lawyers for oral expression in debates.
When speaking in lawyers’ debates, you must also pay attention to the appropriate use of pauses and the continuation and continuation of your spoken language. Pauses are needed not only by lawyers but also by listeners. Oral pauses during the debate can leave room for the listener to reflect and think, and provide a certain space for the exchange of thoughts and emotions between the lawyer and the audience. During the pauses, you must also maintain the coherence of the tone, seize appropriate opportunities, and carry out continuity and continuation. Lawyer debate is a comprehensive use of multiple language expressions, including narration, discussion, criticism, explanation, and lyricism. Different techniques should be used according to different expression methods. This is what the language skills of lawyer debate should be studied. one of the important contents.
②Usage
Another important part of lawyers’ debate language is the use of spoken language. The audible language used by lawyers to argue not only has sound (voice) but also has meaning. Regarding this point, lawyer debates can learn and draw on a lot from speeches and writings. For example, how to use words, how to rhetoric, how to use narrative, argumentation, explanation, lyricism and other languages, as well as the use of various specific language techniques (circumference, opening and closing, contrast, humor, induction, inquiry, reductio ad absurdum, counter-evidence, foil )etc.
In short, good language expression is very important for lawyers to argue. At present, lawyer debates in our country are basically in a state of scripted, straightforward and monotonous expressions. Investigating the reasons, contempt for skills is one of them. This further illustrates the importance of learning and training oral expression skills to improve lawyers' debate level.
(2) Situation
Modern science shows that situational language, like ordinary language, is self-contained and can be understood. The posture language used in lawyers' debates includes appearance,
expressions, gazes, gestures, etc. The judicial nature of a lawyer's argument determines the tone of its posture language, which should be solemn, sincere and clear, without exaggeration, sensationalism, mechanical imitation, or random impulsiveness.
①Appearance
Appearance is composed of body, clothing, appearance, expression, posture and other aspects. Appearance beauty is one of the important factors in the psychological compatibility between the audience and the lawyer, which provides a good start for a successful debate. A lawyer's appearance should be solemn and steady, not frivolous and flashy; it should be neat and generous, not slovenly or overly decorated; it should be natural and harmonious, not imitative.
A person's appearance and body are determined by his talent. Height, shortness, fatness and thinness, beauty and ugliness are all objective realities, and lawyers do not need to worry about them or pretend to hide them. However, it will be beneficial to the debate if the lawyer can choose clothes appropriately and adjust his behavior according to his body shape, appearance, and identity. If someone appears in court dressed up in fancy clothes or wearing fancy clothes, the consequences will be disastrous. The appearance of lawyers in debating is not only reflected in physical appearance, but more importantly, in manners, conversation, cultivation, temperament, etc. The latter is often controlled by reason and can be controlled artificially. Strengthening the cultivation of morality, quality, and tolerance is an important means to increase the beauty of appearance.
②Expression
Court debates are highly confrontational. The content of the debate is either closely related to the rights and interests of the parties; or it is due to the lawyer's lofty moral and legal responsibility. Therefore, court debates are always highly emotional. Although the debate venue requires lawyers to be highly objective and calm, verbal confrontations are always accompanied by strong emotional confrontations.
Speech is the voice of the heart. Language is the main tool for expressing thoughts and feelings, but it is not the only tool. In addition, there is also physical expression. Expression is a complex physiological phenomenon. It can be revealed naturally and unconsciously, or it can be consciously revealed under the control of reason. Using facial expressions to enhance the persuasiveness of a debate, or examining the opponent's facial expressions to capture thoughts that are more subtle, yet more real and subtle than what is expressed in words, is helpful for the success of the debate and is also an important part of lawyers' mastery of debate posture skills. one.
③ Gaze
In situational language, gaze is the most persuasive.
In court arguments, the expression of the eyes plays a very important role in conveying meaning. Some people say that gaze is a special language used by humans to convey spiritual information. Through this window of the soul, lawyers can grasp a lot of potential information, express rich and varied thoughts and emotions, so as to influence and infect the audience, and receive the best effect of the debate.
The correct use of eyes and eyes can eliminate psychological confrontation, communicate emotions, and gain the understanding and trust of the other party; it can express an awe-inspiring attitude and frighten criminals; it can focus the audience's attention and help create language. A good debate atmosphere enhances the appeal of the debate; you can have insight into the other party's psychology, adapt to changes, and adopt correct debate methods; you can master various new information that constantly emerges, seize the ever-changing and fleeting opportunities, and revise the debate Content and debate methods; can awaken the conscience of the audience, expand the connotation of the debate, and increase the aesthetic value of the debate.
Obviously, as an auxiliary means of spoken language, eyes and eyes are by no means dispensable for lawyers' arguments. Whether you admit it or not, know it or not, its important role will always be reflected.
④Gestures
Among posture skills, gestures are a special and important one. Lawyer arguments are not static and purely oral speeches. During a debate, a series of physical movements will occur along with the ups and downs of emotions, and gestures are one of them.
Some people call gestures sign language. Deaf-mute people use this as the main tool to communicate thoughts and feelings, while normal people not only use speech as the main means of expression, but also rely on gestures as an important auxiliary tool.
Because gestures are specific, distinct, vivid, and have a large range of movements, they play a certain positive role in court debates.
a. Gestures can emphasize the key points that need to be highlighted in the debate;
b. Gestures can mobilize the atmosphere of the debate and break the dull, monotonous and dull debate situation;
c. Gestures can create a beautiful image and enhance the attractiveness and persuasiveness of the debate.
Gestures have certain routines and form their own unique system. Certain gestures have certain meanings and are socially established. Therefore, gestures are not only widely understood, but also widely used and have certain application rules.
The application of gestures in lawyer debates must abide by the following principles:
a. When using gestures, attention should be paid to their standardization. It should be conducive to the expression of the content of the debate; it should be easy for the audience to accept and understand, and it should not be arbitrary inventions.
b. Use gestures appropriately, accurately, concisely, powerfully, and naturally; do not be excessive, artificial, or exaggerated.
c. The use of gestures must be consistent with the debate environment. The range of movements should not be too large and strive to be natural and harmonious.