How to determine the evidence validity of the video materials of the TV reporter’s undercover visit?

Legal subjectivity:

How to determine the evidence validity of the video materials of the TV reporter’s secret visit? The evidence must be obtained legally. Only evidence obtained through legal channels can be used as the basis for finalizing a case. It is illegal to record a conversation without the consent of the other party, and the recording materials obtained by this method cannot be used as evidence. Materials recorded privately without the consent of the parties concerned cannot be used as evidence. This approval does not clearly stipulate that people engaged in certain special professions (such as television reporters) can be exempted, and the law does not grant such special rights to poetry reporters. Therefore, video materials obtained by unannounced visits by television reporters cannot be used as evidence. Undercover interviews by reporters are often conducted without the knowledge and consent of the parties concerned. Moreover, some reporters will have their own subjective will when conducting undercover interviews. The information obtained by undercover interviews may not be objective and fair. However, if the information obtained by reporters undercover can prove the same issues as other evidence in the case, it can be used as a reference for finalizing the case. Article 63 of the Civil Procedure Law: Types of evidence: (1) Statements of parties; (2) Documentary evidence; (3) Physical evidence; (4) Audio-visual materials; (5) Electronic data; (6) Witness testimony; (7) Appraisal opinions; (8) Inspection records. Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as a basis for determining facts. If you want to use the law to protect your rights, it is recommended that you conduct online consultation. A professional team of lawyers will answer your questions and protect your rights and interests promptly and legally.