"Lay a more basic foundation" refers to the following three points:
First of all, the examination added an important content-appreciation of literary works.
And use this module to replace the film and television planning in previous years. Compared with the rapid and patterned film and television planning, the appreciation of literary works can better reflect the candidates' language foundation, because in recent years, archaeological poems have been appreciated every year in the national Chinese volume of the college entrance examination. However, the appreciation of literary works of the director major is obviously more demanding than that of Chinese poetry, which is reflected in the large number of words (600 words) and the wide range of appreciation (not only ancient poetry, but also modern poetry, prose and novels). I believe that professionally trained directors will be more handy when doing Chinese appreciation questions in the college entrance examination.
Second, the writing of film reviews has been adjusted.
Here, I'd like to talk about the test method in the first two years-cut out the front part of a complete movie for the candidates to see, and then write a film review. This way is very similar to cultivating professional grave robbers, except that you can't feel * * *, but you still have to cry. The expression of a movie's mood and theme tends to be more and more profound at the end, especially in a movie with strong plot like Looking for a Gun. Until the end, you can't see the director's real intention clearly. Judging from the sample film of Zero in Conduct given by Jean Hugo this time, it should be a complete short film in the next few years, with a length of 30-50 minutes. This is a way to return to basics and common sense. After all, not everyone can be very touched after watching the three-point movie.
The third is to adjust the story creation.
In the past ten years, Fujian provincial unified examination has been using an original story writing method, with the story characters coming from movies and the story plot coming from movies. I don't comment on this method, but it is quite out of line with the story writing method in the school exam, and many students will reflect that the creative method taught by the teacher is of little use in the exam because it will be bound by the original story in the movie. This reform has become a story that gives key words, a story that may be a proposition, or a continuing story, but it is always to get rid of shackles and become more basic.
"Make the major more professional" refers to the following two points:
First, from the original "common sense of film and television" to "common sense of film and television, art and music". The expansion of the examination scope makes the Fujian provincial examination more in line with the college examination. Candidates' mastery of knowledge is three times or more than the original, which should also be the adjustment made by Fujian Education Examinations Institute under the general trend of "taking exams at school and recognizing exams at provincial level". I have always given students this view-"common sense of literature and art can make you pass the provincial unified examination, and others can make you get high marks." Next, both candidates and training institutions should pay more attention to the accumulation of basic knowledge of literature and art than before, and the accumulation process will become longer, and it is not necessarily possible to get a good result through several simulation papers. Special note: No matter from the examples given in the reform plan or the examination questions in recent years, the history of China art, the history of China music and the history of China film must account for a relatively large proportion.
Second, the analysis of film and television phenomenon has changed from two problems to one problem, but the number of words has increased. This means that the topic analysis is deeper and wider. I always think that the analysis of the first 350 words is quite lame. I can't say what I want to say. The number of words has been changed to 500, but I can fully discuss some opinions. After all, the original intention of this question is "expository question", not "short answer question".
Attach a clearer comparison table to intuitively feel the changes in the outline.
Finally, I want to say that the new requirements of this reform for the training industry are that training subjects will increase, training hours will become longer and training costs will increase. The requirement for candidates is to pay attention to the training of Chinese foundation and arrange the time of on-campus study and off-campus training more reasonably. Every reform is a new opportunity. We are new opportunities.
Let's work together to enhance the competitiveness of Fujian directors!