What idea does the poem about the Big Wild Goose Pagoda reflect?

About Wild Goose Pagoda is one of the representative works of Han Dong, a new generation writer, and there are different opinions about it. This paper intends to appreciate the content. Keywords: "About the Wild Goose Pagoda" is one of Han Dong's masterpieces. The interpretation of this poem has long been controversial, and the wise have different opinions. Next, I want to make a new interpretation of the poem from its content. First of all, the poet's question mocked the self-righteousness of human beings. We often think that we can well understand and grasp the objective reality and everything that exists outside ourselves. In this understanding and grasp, we have mastered the essence and objective laws of things, so that we can grasp the world, transform the world, manipulate the world, and make everything in the world revolve around people-this is the megalomaniac of human subject! Here, Han Dong asked a thought-provoking question about what H often learned: "What can we know about the Big Wild Goose Pagoda"? In this poem, it shows the poet's refutation of the above-mentioned confident subject: what can we know about the "big" outside us? All our understanding of it is imposed by human beings themselves, and we only understand ourselves on the object of "Big Wild Goose Pagoda". And what can we know about the real "Wild Goose Pagoda"-this huge and silent tower? We and "Wild Goose Pagoda" are always two different beings, and we can never enter each other. "Wild Goose Pagoda" only uses its wordlessness and silence to express its rejection and rejection and an incomprehensible contempt! Not only the "Wild Goose Pagoda", but also between all things, subjects and subjects, "What can we know"? Here, the poet shows a clear and conscious understanding of the limits and boundaries of human ability. However, "many people climb from afar to be heroes", and many people climb the Big Wild Goose Pagoda from afar. The Wild Goose Pagoda in their mind is not the Wild Goose Pagoda itself, but a symbol, an unconscious cultural symbol, and a potential substitute in everyone's mind. They don't know the Big Wild Goose Pagoda. What they know is the legend in the book and the scenery in the painting. They came here to "climb up and be heroes". Climbing the Wild Goose Pagoda can give them a heroic illusion and satisfy this heroic desire! Humans need substitutes to vent their potential desires, and the Big Wild Goose Pagoda has become a prop for them to masturbate. The poet is sneering and satirizing here. It is ridiculous enough to travel thousands of miles just to satisfy one's desire! But even more ridiculous and nasty may be that "some will do it for the second time \ or more", which is simply insatiable and insatiable! Even better, the word "do" shows a stylized expression of life, a conscious self-deception and an affectation! And the Wild Goose Pagoda itself has become a ravaged object, an obscene object. Where is its respect? The poet laughs at "dissatisfied people \ fat people", and there may be others. Do poets think that these two kinds of people are particularly unsuitable for climbing the Big Wild Goose Pagoda? This is related to China's tradition of visiting ancient times. Chen Ziang's masterpiece "on a Gate-Tower at Youzhou" is a feeling when life is confused: "In front of me, where are those lost years? Behind me, where are the future generations? . I thought of heaven and earth, with no limit and no end. I was alone, and my tears fell. This can be said to have created a tradition of poetry visiting the past. Looking at the distance, the rusty past, uncertain future and bleak reality rushed into the poet's broad mind. A sense of loneliness between heaven and earth, a sense of responsibility for the world, the country and the subject will naturally make the poet express his lofty sentiments and ambitions. However, in Han Dong's view, "those who are dissatisfied \ those who gain weight \ are not thinking about the past. Naturally, they don't want to be "heroes" after reaching the summit-take Wan Li Road and climb the Wild Goose Pagoda again! Here, the poet not only mocked the frustration of Chen Ziang and other poets after him, but also mocked this poetic tradition and the sour "fat" that generally refers to the lateral development of the body after middle age, and described this lateral development as "fat", which also implied that people would succeed in their careers in middle age. Compared with dissatisfied people, "fat people" are a horseshoe disease in spirit, and they can see all the flowers in one day. Physiologically speaking, obesity is obesity, and obesity is bloated, which means uncoordinated and heavy, and it is a manifestation of the loss of elasticity of body functions. In the animal world, getting fat may mean death, which means facing the danger of being eliminated in the competition of survival of the fittest. Therefore, an agile trunk and a strong body are the survival capital of animals. I'm afraid it's not just the fattening of literary language. The increase of Wan Fang's data and literature aid cypress 12 may just be mental pallor and destruction. There are many such words in Chinese, such as: the brain is full of fat, the heart is wide, the body is fat ... and because of the increase of thinking, there are many thin poems. Probably the most famous is "I don't regret my clothes getting wider and wider, and I am haggard for Iraq". Overeating leads to body fat, which may be the behavior of epidemic households. There is a joke in the concession of semi-colonial and semi-feudal society. How to judge whether those colonists are of noble descent and elite in their own country depends on whether they have gained weight after coming to China for several years. Those who are fat are nouveau riche, while those who are not fat are roughly of noble descent. Because the nouveau riche from poor to rich, the first thing to satisfy is appetite, even fat bloated! After Li Zicheng occupied Beijing, didn't he forget to have a banquet? The poet sneered at the spirit of the nouveau riche fat giver and described a farce to people.