The statement that modern poetry (please note that it is modern poetry, ancient poetry is not restricted, and the law of length is ignored) is not allowed to use words repeatedly. According to the research of today's scholars, it seems that it was initiated by poetry critics in Ming and Qing Dynasties, and people in Tang and Song Dynasties did not pay much attention to it. Therefore, there are many cases of repeated use of words in modern poetry between Tang and Song Dynasties (some reference statistics are provided at the end of the article). Poets in the Ming and Qing Dynasties believed that repeated use of Chinese characters was a kind of problem and should be avoided when writing regular poems. If there are repeated words in a metrical poem, it is called "transgression". To put it simply, this is a "taboo" when writing metrical poems, but it is not a meter. Moreover, "criminal repetition" does not refer to all cases of repeated use of words. The following categories of repeated words will not be regarded as "repeated crimes": (a) repeated words of the same description, sharing and connection are not regarded as "repeated crimes". Examples are: Du Fu's "Guest Arrival": north of me, south of me, spring is in flood; ..... (This is the same thing) Wei Yingwu's to my friends li dan and yuanxi: we met last among flowers, among flowers we parted, and here, a year later, there are flowers again. ..... (This is a connection echo) Du Fu's beginning of spring: fine lettuce in spring, suddenly recalling the time when Xijing plum blossom. Dish out the white jade in the high gate, and the dish is handed over to the hands to send the moss. ... the word "dish" in the first sentence is divided into three or four sentences, which is the way of "sharing". As for the word "spring" in the first sentence, it is the category of "homology". (b) Rhetorical needs, such as the application of overlapping words, truthfulness, and echo, are not considered as "crimes." Examples are: Du Fu's Ascending the Mountain: … leaves are dropping down like the spray of a waterfall, while I watch the long river always rolling on. ..... (this is a reduplication) Su Shi's "Nostalgia with the Son by Mianchi": ... What is life like everywhere? It should be like feihong stepping through the snow. Fingers and claws occasionally flow on the mud, and Hongfei flies that complex thing. ... (The repetition of the word "mud" is the truth, and the repetition of "Fei Hong" is the loop). From the above examples, it can be understood that the "transgression" referred to by poets in Ming and Qing dynasties is mainly aimed at those unconscious repetitions. They do not reject the repeated use of words based on structural or rhetorical arrangements. As for writing regular poems nowadays, should we follow this "taboo" There is no absolute answer to this question. Some poets think it is necessary, while others think it is not. In my humble opinion, it is not a good way to avoid repeating words in general and without analysis. It is not good to completely ignore the spirit of "strict choice of words" advocated behind it. In a word, as long as a certain word, after careful consideration, judges for itself, only it can express its meaning accurately, fluently and elegantly, then there is no need to stick to whether to commit a crime or not. However, if there are other words and phrases that can achieve the same effect and avoid repetition, we should also choose other words and phrases to add more changes to the whole poem literally. Supplementary data at the end of the article In order to understand whether people in Tang and Song Dynasties really don't care too much about the repeated use of words, some scholars have taken some works of famous poets from the selected poems of Tang and Song Dynasties, such as Sun Qinan's Excellent Poems of the Five Laws of Tang Dynasty, Qi Tang's Excellent Poems of Law and Gao Buying's Excerpts of Poems of Tang and Song Dynasties, and made a "guilty review". The following statistics are obtained: Du Fu's Seven Laws: three out of thirty-three (about 9%) Li Shangyin's Seven Laws; five out of twenty-six (19%) Su Shi's Seven Laws; three out of thirteen (23%) Wang Wei's Five Laws; five out of eighteen (27%) Lu You's Seven Laws; four out of ten (4%) Bai Juyi's Seven Laws. %) Although the proportion of these poets is only very small, and the statistics are only partial, they are more or less reflected in the people of Tang and Song Dynasties, and they generally don't care much about avoiding repeated use of words.
Reference: Personal understanding
Not
For example, the first sentence of Li He's Wild Goose Gate Taishouxing: Dark clouds crush the city to destroy it
It is enough to use an example for this sentence. 27-8-3 12:31:45 Supplement: Komatsu (Du Xunhe? Tang) Since I was a child, I grew up in the deep grass. < P > Now I gradually feel Artemisia scoparia. At that time, people didn't know "Lingyun" wood
and waited for "Lingyun" to start high. It can be seen that
not only words can be reused
words can also be reused
Do you want to avoid it as much as possible
See how poets feel
If repeated use can make poetry more perfect
Why not
Why not stick to it. Li Bai: I will drink wine
(When reading
The teacher teaches us
. Regardless of whether it is a poem, a song
or a poem
, the first two sentences are like this: "You don't see" how the Yellow River's waters move out of heaven ............. "You don't see" how lovely locks in bright mirrors in high chambers .............
27-8-31 21:26:54 Supplement: atse127 predecessors: very detailed
The younger one had another free class.