It is an ideal to treat things rather than people, but I have never seen anyone achieve it.
In life, when you face family and friends, you must treat things the same as others.
Seems like a lot of negative criticism towards adults. Accusing your husband of "you always do this" because he throws away garbage or is slovenly is overstepping the scope of the matter. It is also true that his behavior has not changed over the years.
Give children more positive encouragement. When your child greets neighbors politely, says thank you after buying something, or gives up his seat on the bus, you will praise him, "You are awesome." The books all instruct you to be specific in your praise, which is also the right thing to teach. But most parents treat the people behind the scenes, and you are such a great person.
There are more negative criticisms at work. Most leaders seem to have mastered these techniques. Some people arrive late and leave early, some go out without leave, some skip meetings, some are terrible at work... For all these reasons, leaders hold meetings to criticize them without naming them. But everyone knows who to criticize. The question is how effective it is? A good citizen who occasionally commits a crime is trembling with fear when he hears about it, but he corrects it after hearing about it. Repeated offenders never change, and what’s even more ridiculous is that I wasn’t even present when the leader criticized me. Leaders are afraid of being betrayed, but repeat offenders are not. Strange!
In the episode "Is it OK to treat the situation but not the person?", the two sides went back and forth with swords and swords.
I remember Yang Qihan’s second-row counterattack. How wonderful! He apologized first, but Luo didn't tell the whole story and only complained. Yang "dissed Luo Zhenyu" because he "dissed the situation rather than the person." The person involved was so angry that he refused to forgive generously even during the recording of the show. Look, how can we separate criticism on things from its impact on people?
I still remember Ma Dong’s explanation of “things”.
Things are relationships between people. Citing the example of Google's self-driving car possibly hitting two people at the same time and choosing to hit the person wearing a helmet, it clearly explains how things are related to each other. Impressive.
Chen Lingyue is right. After watching the entire season of Qi Pa Shuo 6, what can be left behind.
I only remember that Yan Rujing and Huang Zhizhong got together, and Huang Zhizhong's "distant cry" argument was still because of Li Dan's speech.
Yan Rujing’s talk about legal provisions is very interesting, and divorce also requires choosing the right time.
Xiao Xiao is a single parent. He can go to Yunnan even if he can’t go to Shanghai. His family situation is very good. Therefore, the argument of “mother is superman” did not convince me at all. Instead, he lamented that “people are always limited by their own experiences.” ".
Xiao Hei is very funny.
Zhan Qingyun and Pang Ying hug together. Zhan Qingyun is always very impassioned.
Although Xu Jiru was eliminated early, she always "makes herself better" to solve problems, which is obviously too idealistic.
Jin Jing is a big dark horse with a strong acting ability.
The image of Mr. Hu as a high school teacher is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.
Ran Gaoming, um...a bit naughty?
Fu Seoul has rich life experience and is very comfortable debating family or children's issues.
Cheng Lu has a calm temperament.
Li Dan is knowledgeable, Xue Zhaofeng makes people want to study economics again, Luo Zhenyu makes people want to see it at all, Cai Kangyong has a profoundness that has lasted for a long time, Ma Dong is entertaining and profound...
p>
Which paragraph would you like to read again?
Let’s talk about Jin Jing!