Words must be concise and to the point.
If we can't reach an appropriate conclusion, we can also have the necessary discussion without conclusion.
Suggestions, research ideas, suggestions for improvement of instruments and equipment, problems to be solved, etc. Can be put forward in the conclusion or discussion.
Don't simply repeat and list the experimental results, but carefully clarify my creative achievements and new ideas in graduation work, my position and role in this field, and the significance of new ideas.
The existing problems and shortcomings should be described objectively.
We should strictly distinguish between our own achievements and those of others (especially tutors).
The task of conclusion is to express creative, instructive and empirical results through strict logical reasoning on the basis of theoretical analysis and experimental verification.
It also embodies the value of papers or research results with its own order, clarity and objectivity.
The conclusion echoes the introduction and, like the abstract, can provide a basis for readers and authors of secondary literature.
The content of the conclusion is not a simple repetition of the research results, but a deeper understanding of the research results. It is a new general view from the whole content of the text and a part of the introduction through the process of judgment, induction and reasoning.
It mainly includes: (1) What problems are explained by the results of this study, what laws are drawn, and what theoretical or practical problems are solved; To summarize the innovative content of the paper, the wording should be accurate and rigorous, and it should not be ambiguous or ambiguous.