This is an effective use of figurative rhetoric, which can make the description more vivid.
1. Rhetoric methods: metaphor, personification, rhetorical question, metonymy, antithesis, exaggeration, comparison, allusion, adaptation, intertextuality, repetition, etc.
2. Metaphor: noumenon (figurative object), vehicle (figurative object) and figurative word (symbolic word of figurative relationship) Category: Simile A is like B.
Ontology, figurative words and vehicles are all obvious. The leaves stick out of the water high, like elegant dancers' skirts. Like, like, like, like ...
3. Metaphor A is B, and both ontology and metaphor appear. When "yes" is used in the middle, there are more "cheng" and "Lian", and the dark clouds are four in one, and the mountains and rivers are all ink landscapes.
4, borrow a generation of B. There is no ontology, directly describe the vehicle. . Metaphor uses several metaphors to illustrate an ontology.
The most common rain is once every three or two days. Don't be upset. Look, it is like cow hair, like a needle, like a filament, densely woven into a diagonal. There is a thin layer of smoke on the roof.
5. Metonymy: Metonymy is a rhetorical device, which replaces the things to be expressed with related things.
This kind of rhetoric does not directly say who or what. Types of metonymy:
1 Replace the noumenon with the characteristics of things: Red Eye knows that there is only one old lady in his family. The proper name is generally called: Our times need thousands of good people in Qian Qian.
4. Part of the whole generation: singing with low eyebrows and no writing; 5. The result-the reason: specializing in pen and ink, laughing for the strong man (laughter is the result). When using metonymy, we must grasp the most typical characteristics of things, and the borrowing body and ontology of metonymy cannot appear.
6. Similarities and differences between metonymy and metonymy: they all substitute one thing for another, and the noumenon of things does not appear.
Difference: the function of metonymy is to call metonymy, that is, directly call metonymy ontology, only metonymy is self-evident. The function of metonymy is metaphor. The relevance of the basic things that constitute metonymy requires a certain relationship between the borrowing body and the ontology.
The basis of metonymy is the similarity of things, which requires that the vehicle and the ontology have certain similarity.
7. Analogy: Analogy is a rhetorical way of writing things A into things B, including writing things into people (personification); Write people as crops (imitations); Write (imitate) this thing into another thing.
Personification: personification of things. Imitation: materialization of A and B ... Gazi pricked up his ears to listen to the difference between analogy and metaphor: analogy is to write ontology according to the characteristics of the simulated thing. The emphasis is on drafting.
Metaphor is ontological metaphor, with emphasis on metaphor. Comparatively speaking, ontology and quasi-ontology blend with each other, and ontology will inevitably appear. In metaphor, the ontology may or may not appear, but the vehicle must appear.