The topic should be vague, especially when the topic is long, such as "the role of Yang Yuhuan's love and kerosene in the imperial garden in the middle Tang Dynasty"; If the title is short, it can be specific or vague, such as "Meng" and "catching cicadas". Of course, it is best to have a title of about 5 to 10, such as "Red Coffee", "Fishing for the Moon in Pear Water" and so on. In short, we should take the principle of preserving our sanity, make others not sure what you want to say, and give ourselves and readers some room for exceptions, as long as there are no typos. The advantage of this is that readers can create their own associations or artistic conception in an uncertain space; If you tell him/her that he/she understands an artistic conception, everyone will laugh and feel that they are all talented people. There is far more love than hate in this world. If the reader is in a bad mood that day, for example, he/she is lovelorn, loses his/her wallet, has no hot water to wash his/her face in cold weather, or can't wake up after playing mahjong, even if he/she tries hard, he/she will probably speak ill of your poem. Although you basically don't know whether his/her bad words are justified or out of thin air, you still have to fight back, don't you? At this time, if the title of your poem is ambiguous, you have more room for manoeuvre; If you are in a bad mood, you can raise your voice and accuse him/her of not understanding your poem. After a debate, who is afraid of who is not? Besides, if you keep this skill, you will basically be invincible.
Of course, if there is a typo in your title, admit it quickly, because there is no way to deny it; Doing so will make people think that you are at least a modest person. If you weigh the gains and losses, you won't lose. At the same time, we should insinuate that this is just a clerical error, not that our level is poor, but that we should not say it clearly. Of course, if you keep typing wrong words, this trick won't work, and I guess you're embarrassed to use it again and again. Therefore, the necessary writing skills on weekdays still need training.
(2) Poetry criticism
In fact, I guess most writers are not sure whether their poems are really good (for example, amy grain never thought he wrote well). What should you do if you meet such excellent masters as Li Bai, Su Shi, Cao Xueqin and Tagore and point out your fly in the ointment? This problem is more complicated. Let me summarize, but not summarize, the following situations and corresponding countermeasures. Those who believe are encouraged, and those who don't believe are dragged down.
○: First of all, admit that Li Bai is right. Big waves wash sand, the eternal reputation is not blown out, you dare to deny that rotten yogurt hit your head with a hammer of rotten frangipani granite blue bricks. Even if you try your best to defend yourself, you will only be overwhelmed by the noise of this world. This is also the helpless side of life.
One: amy grain, as a representative, if you write acid essays just for fun and review your Chinese characters, then if you are in a good mood, listen to them, because according to my estimation, at least there will be no harm; Of course, there is no need to memorize those famous instructions as dogmas and carve them in chairs as mottos, because that will be very tiring, won't it? If you are in a bad mood, act lukewarm, but don't overdo it. Li Bai is a clever man. As long as you are a little impatient, they will get up and leave.
Second: If you really want to improve yourself. Because of this, you should try your best to understand what Li Bai said, and you'd better write it down in shorthand for future memory. Because of Li Bai's talent and beauty, it is estimated that it is difficult for you to fully understand it once and for all. At this time, you have to observe the text. If Li Bai's thoughts are still unfinished, you can take the initiative to ask them to teach you again, so that they will be very interested and you can understand more. In this way, the two sides will have a good time. Li Bai thinks they are polite, corporal, and you can be proud of being able to talk and laugh with the bosses. Don't interrupt yourself if they show impatience. Understand as much as you can, and don't ask too much. After all, contentment is always happy.
If someone speaks ill of your poem and you don't accept it, you are expected to win, so you should argue with reason, keep your manners, avoid personal attacks and strive for a total victory; If you think you can't win, or you don't care about arguing, pretend not to see the comments, unless someone points a finger at your nose and scolds you, but I don't know that time is the best forgetful agent. After several years of hot and cold, everyone can forget all about ethnic hatred and family feuds, not to mention your inexplicable poetry comments. Of course, if you are convinced, but thin-skinned, leave a message, bow and say thank you, it is also a good courtesy and a reflection of human feelings. I, amy grain, belong to this type; If you are convinced and generous, you can say thank you to others and criticize yourself innocently, especially those obvious shortcomings, such as typesetting and punctuation, so that people will think you are modest, studious and smart, because you can understand some of your shortcomings through the guidance of others. Although it is not painful or profound, it is estimated that the space is limited and the courage is commendable. But remember, don't tell your privacy or innermost secrets when you are excited, such as your bank account number and password, whether you love Miss Wang and Miss Zhang, etc. Only in the dead of night can you think for yourself. This is called understanding life.
In any case, it is no problem to be praised or criticized by poetry critics. Don't be discouraged at any time. To be reasonable, you must always be green. In love, just like a public welfare website like Pond, this communication platform needs everyone's support, care and love. Moreover, although it is difficult for everyone to be a responsible editor here, it is easy to be a master. After all, New China has a population of 654.38+04 billion, and we can all be masters of our own affairs. In a word, discouragement is not good for you. When you are alive, don't be uncertain about your joys and sorrows with temporary gains and losses. Even if it is only a little knowledge, we must strive for a long stream of water.
(3) Poetic schools
Classification is popular all over the world now. It is said that Mendeleev won the Nobel Prize by sorting out the elements, while modern mathematicians and physicists went further. A group theory, classified here and there, has produced countless Nobel Prize winners of Fields Prize and Wolff Prize. God divides human beings into yellow race, white race, black race and brown race, and everyone is busy. For example, Indian blacks have written many touching poems because they can be classified as white races. Just like we have a civilization history of 5,000 years, singing is really our endless pride. To make a long story short, since God is not immune from vulgarity, although poets claim to be elegant and refined (if they are careless, they will be rewarded with elegance and vulgarity), they cannot compete with God after all, so it is inevitable to classify themselves. Usually people divide themselves into many schools according to aesthetic differences, aesthetic character, aesthetic value, aesthetic pursuit, lyric strategy, number of words and lines, author's age and degree, weather at that time, football lottery market and many other factors, such as imagism, repentance, obscurity, postmodernism, religion and so on. As the saying goes, when a fellow villager sees a fellow villager, his eyes are full of tears. In fact, just like the poetry genre, it is easier for people of the same kind to communicate and understand. For example, amy grain has more affection for animals than plants, and it is the same for kittens than for towering trees. So, if Amy Gu flaunts herself as a confessional poet, even if I am extremely poor and calm inside, maybe I can get the love and warm embrace of another confessional poet (such as Sylvia Plath) for no reason. Then why did Plath do it? On the one hand, she doesn't have any studies, and she doesn't have to study statistical financial computers like amy grain, so she always has leisure time in her busy schedule; Second, if the world is like this, the wilderness is a way out, not rude; Third, she asked me to read her poems, say I understand and cheer for her. She estimated that I would do the same. Why? Because I flaunt myself as a confessor, I have to pretend to understand her poems whether I can understand them or not, otherwise I will slap myself. Such a stupid thing is not done by smart people. Fourth, it can be crazy, which is the trend of poetry, and it can also prove that her poems are excellent, because her feelings are crazy, so how can her works be neither fragrant nor enthusiastic, nor tasteless? As we all know, it was after Miss Plath committed suicide that she climbed to the top of Ling, while Holdrin in Germany had difficulty even graduating when she was sober. After being crazy, she seems to surpass Goethe, the master.
Therefore, this poem is a nobody, like amy grain. If you want to achieve something in poetry, you must classify yourself as a genre, otherwise it will be a lonely soul in the wilderness, or at least it will be difficult, because if you don't belong to any genre, people will think that you have no personality and no one will cheer for you. If you call yourself a sect, the possibility of being praised by your predecessors is greatly increased. Although this ex can't understand what you wrote, or even read it, he/she will pretend to understand it, because he/she has to show his erudition and care for the younger generation. For example, when writing comments and letters of recommendation, he/she will quote a few lines at will and make irresponsible remarks. If this comment is to the point, it is naturally good. If it is nonsense, it is knowledgeable and you will admire it. At the same time, you feel that learning is endless. In short, your relationship will develop in a benign direction. A gentleman returns a peach, while a villain returns a nectar.
Just like if I register a website, I have to choose a sect, such as Water Elf Sect, Wind Elf Sect and so on. At that time, where did I know what a Sect was? So I picked a random aquarium elf pie. If I want to write something on the website often, I will pay attention to which Sect is strong. For example, if the Elvism Sect in Zu Feng is the most prosperous, I will go to have it both ways, join it and become a traitor. Why? Because everything I write is vague, which is equivalent to nothing. That penitent postmodernism equals me. There really is no difference. Just like the People First Party and the * * * Party in the United States, there is not much difference in their policy of governing the country. They all do things that are harmless to the people on the premise of seeking their own interests. Today I am a party, and tomorrow I will be happy.