People don't claim that artificial intelligence has been redefining the art industry, but they can cite some loopholes that can show that AI has clearly entered the art field. Many artists have been accepting artificial intelligence products and making their products-music, poetry, songs or works of art-better. In the case that art has accepted AI, it is a supplementary agreement, and artists think when AI is realized. The following sections describe three such examples.
2017165438+10, dancer KaijiMoriyama didn't play the piano with a finger. When Moriyama danced and played the piano, the audience was fascinated and added dance moves one after another. The sensor behind Moriyama made this amazing event possible, providing input for AI interpretation and outputting it through the piano. Surprisingly, musical instruments can predict, match steps and play appropriate notes. In 20 17, the Design and Innovation Expo was held in Toronto. At the Expo, the architect had a huge and complicated glass product shaped like a nerve cell. It is suspended in the air and responds to the actions of human participants. Glass products are on display in an abandoned old soap factory. Because artworks respond to the different actions of audience members by changing the lighting mode and surround sound output, the audience of the exhibition is fascinated. Artificial intelligence can achieve this amazing movement.
In 20 17, at an art exhibition in London, a group of plastic spheres attracted the audience. The plastic ball will move, tilt, rise or rise alone in space because the audience makes various actions, such as clapping hands, raising arms or jumping, and react. The audience was surprised and acknowledged the intelligent response displayed by the sphere. Spheres seem to imitate human movements. This is achieved by AI. Microsoft's AIbot allows you to enter a written description of a picture and generate a picture according to the description. For example, if you need an image of a tiger walking through a forest, just write a description and let the robot get it from there. It seems that robots can recognize these words and map them with images to form a complete image.
In the current art industry, artificial intelligence can only supplement the efforts of artists at most. Admittedly, the future is unknown. To this end, AI uses machine learning technology. Artificial intelligence is given a relevant training data set, based on which it is expected to recognize patterns and produce its output. At present, artificial intelligence can't produce amazing and complicated things, but something that can complement the artist's works.
Take AutoDraw as an example, which is an AI algorithm developed by Google. AutoDraw can make works of art based on sketches drawn by artists. Its working principle is automatic completion. It guesses the required output according to the sketch or the artist's outline, and provides art works options. There is no doubt that the output quality is good enough. To be sure, artists such as music composers, painters or poets can rely on artificial intelligence to produce basic outputs, and then they can expand or consolidate these outputs. The output quality produced by various AI applications is amazing. What is particularly impressive is the speed and accuracy of production. Artificial intelligence has always brought the ancient technical principles of speed, efficiency and accuracy into the art field. Many examples can be cited to support this argument.
First of all, it is important to admit that AI has developed to a certain stage in creating artistic works. AI is driven by machine learning technology. It obtains data and creates its own algorithm by learning various data and recognition patterns. You can say that it tries to imitate the role of the human brain: imagine vision or composition and show them in some form. But it still doesn't think like a human brain, which is why it is still a supplement to artists and usually doesn't create wonderful works of art independently. The next stage is to be able to create independently, but this seems to be far from traveling.
Summary: AI is still an exaggerated technology in the art world. AI is obviously not ready to surpass or replace human artists soon. Most of the publicity and drums are just hype. However, its role in supplementing artists and creating amazing art can never be underestimated. It improves efficiency, accuracy and productivity, which is very important for artists.