In the final analysis, temperament is only an evaluation of a person's overall external image. A person with poetic temperament may be a businessman, a fisherman, an accountant or a technician. A real poet may not look like a poet. The poet's temperament can have little to do with the poet himself, but a summary of people's most common and even imaginary impressions of the poet.
Potential is higher than temperament. Potential refers to having a certain talent, which is waiting to be discovered or brought into full play until you finally become a poet. At least one poet can write poetry, not too bad, and publish it everywhere. So the potential here is nothing more than saying that you can write some small poems. If you continue to work hard, you may become a poet. This describes a possibility and is internal. The potential to become a poet is closer to a poet than any poet's temperament, or belongs to a poet, because any poet must have the potential to become a poet before becoming a poet, bypassing =V=
You have the talent to be a poet, which generally means that in a certain field, you have demonstrated skills or knowledge superior to ordinary people. What is the poet's talent? Is to write poetry, no matter how charming the poet's temperament is, of course, we pay more attention to his professional and technical content, so what does it mean to say that a person has the talent to become a poet? That's it. Suppose this person has the talent to be a poet. If you have a gift, you will. Just as Mozart could not have written a symphony at the age of seven, we would not call him the magical power of music. We say that he is talented because he did something that no one can do at the age of seven. If nothing has been done, what's more, the poet may not have the talent to write poetry. Genius poets are great and good poets, and they will last forever. It's not just that a poet is "talented" and sweaty-besides, how can he be talented before he becomes a poet? Isn't this a potential duplication?
We can say that a person has the talent to write poetry, because he either shows his own new ideas or characteristics in poetry or has unique opinions, which is very different from what we say that a person has the talent to be a poet. First of all, you don't need talent to be a poet, you just need to be beautiful and refined, and your writing is dust-free. Anyone can become a poet, and the poet himself is just a professional identity. As for those who think about poets now, poets are just a professional identity. Even ideologically, what a poet represents, such as romance and elegance, is not worth advocating, but out of personal interest. Isn't it a bit excessive to use the word "talent" to worship this professional identity and the so-called "poet temperament"? Poets have published many poems with or without poems. If you don't overestimate the poet, you misunderstand the poet = =