1.ji (first sound)
2. Solution (third sound)
3. Wei (second voice)
4. Change "war" into "sword"
5. Change "diameter" to "shank"
6. Horizontal Skimming-Hold Point
7. Function
8. Crucian carp crossing the river
9. The description article is well written, and others can't add another sentence.
10. Mandarin
judge
1. Second from the right. Error 3. Error 4. Error 5. Right 6. Right 7. Right eight. Right 9. Right 10. That's right.
Three. multiple choice
1.A 2。 A 3。 A 4。 B 5。 D 6。 B 7。 An eight. A nine. B 10。 A
Four. multiple-choice
1. a B 2. 3 BC. C4 explosive. A C 5 pistol. The sixth century ad. 7 BC. C D 8。 A C 9. B C 10。 B.C.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) modifies a sick sentence.
1. The teacher not only stimulated the students' desire to speak, but also made them understand how to describe it. Moreover, the following sentences are ambiguous and need a clear subject.
2. We improve students' enthusiasm for new poetry from three aspects. (Improper collocation, mobilization is not worthy of enthusiasm, just change the verb)
3. Poetry appreciation questions in all provinces have chosen a more clear and direct way to examine knowledge points. (Direct method is better)
These topics can only be speechless for those children who are immersed in endless mountains and seas every day.
Not only the teacher's beautiful blackboard writing makes students feel more cordial, but also the teacher's writing attitude can exert a subtle influence on students.
I don't know how to say special numerals in high school. . . I hope it helps. . . . Points. . . . . . .
Composition:
Yang Zhenning, Li Zhengdao, Deng Jiaxian, Zhu Guangya ... When we heard this string of resounding names, the first words that came to mind were "National Southwest Associated University". Under the influence of the school spirit of "democracy, freedom, preciseness, truth-seeking, vivid innovation, and unity and hard work", The National SouthWest Associated University spent eight years creating an unrepeatable myth in the history of education. The United Nations General Assembly selects good seedlings. It takes a lot of effort to cultivate quietly, and then spread out the excellent varieties. In recent years, the "pinching the top" in colleges and universities has become increasingly fierce, and means have emerged one after another. In addition to the general measures to reduce scores and encourage high scholarships, colleges and universities have also adopted the policy of "signing pre-admission agreements". After the college entrance examination, the school contacted the high-scoring candidates in advance, and promised that 65,438+000% of the contracted candidates would be admitted after filling in their volunteers, and even some of them.
The same is to recruit outstanding students, but the meaning is very different. The role of examination in talent training and selection is limited. If the role of the exam is infinitely exaggerated, it will not only help the normal cultivation of "top students", but will really pinch the "top students". The phenomenon of "pinching the top of colleges and universities" infinitely magnifies the decisive role of exams and scores, and embodies the quick success and instant benefit of education. Universities put the enrollment index in the first place, falling into the trap of the number of top students, the number of admission scores, the number of high-quality students, etc., as the educational capital for the school to show off, create a "face project" and enhance "graded achievements", while ignoring the fundamental task of university education-talent training.
The phenomenon of "pinching the top of colleges and universities" cannot be achieved overnight, and its existence has its necessary conditions. Since the resumption of the college entrance examination, a unified score standard has become a yardstick for measuring talents. Admittedly, exam-oriented education has its inevitable drawbacks, but it is a measure to adapt to the national conditions of China, a populous country. Although it is reasonable that there is a gap between idiots in the same subject, and the on-site examination contains many opportunity factors, which cannot reflect the real strength difference between candidates, it is precisely because of the opportunity of this uncertain factor that the test scores of social talent standards are dependent, and the rules and regulations in the operation of society at a specific time have aggravated the phenomenon of diploma worship in famous schools. In this way, both schools and students have sufficient conditions to make the phenomenon of "colleges and universities pinching the top" worse and worse.
However, the proof of university strength depends on absorbing the number of "top students" in the college entrance examination, or on the influence and contribution of cultivating high-quality graduates through university education to society? The answer is beyond reproach. It is unfair for colleges and universities to "pinch the top", so it is necessary to "take part-time job as the specimen" to deal with failure. Although in recent years, the Ministry of Education has asked local education departments not to rank candidates' college entrance examination results and not to announce the top candidates, this has protected the privacy of candidates to a certain extent and caused resistance to the top candidates in the college entrance examination. However, with the exposure of high-priced buying, stealing and cajoling candidates' information, the public has realized that just imitating is not the real solution to the problem. The only way out is to break the hierarchical system and batch admission mode of education itself. There is still a long way to go to solve the "college entrance examination".
However, existence is reasonable. Is it really necessary to completely eradicate the "top student in the college entrance examination"? After all, the starting point for schools to attract outstanding students through various means is very simple, that is, they hope their universities can rely on these fresh blood to go up a storey still higher and gain an advantage in school competition. Although there is the disadvantage of one-size-fits-all scores, it is inevitable in the context of exam-oriented education, and quite a few schools are taking corresponding measures to solve the phenomenon of "one-size-fits-all", such as taking students' abilities and rewards in middle schools as reference standards and appropriately lowering the threshold when they enter universities. It is obviously unreasonable to say that it is only by absorbing "top students" to enhance the reputation of a university. However, the reputation and honor of a school is a long-term project, and it is impossible to succeed in just one or two years. Therefore, in order to obtain the long-term "top-notch" right, colleges and universities must undoubtedly make long-term adjustments and upgrades in their own hardware facilities and teaching staff, which is precisely to upgrade the grade of the school and strengthen the internal organization of the school.
In addition, from the perspective of students, if colleges and universities favor them, they must first prove that they have this ability and market. The success of "pinching the top of colleges and universities" depends not only on the long-term objective attraction of the school itself, but also on the preferential conditions acceptable to top students. From the students' point of view, such a "buyer's market" increases their choice space, so why not find the most suitable learning and living environment for their development in the process of choice?
The reason why "the top of colleges and universities" can cause widespread debate in society is precisely because it has advantages and disadvantages, and there are different opinions. Let time prove whether its existence is reasonable.