What's the difference between william blake's Tiger and Lamb?

Of course there is! The author imagines himself as a tiger and a lamb, so what he sees and feels becomes what the tiger and the lamb see and feel. Isn't this william blake's writing characteristic? Questioning means that he compares his mood to a tiger and a lamb, and concretizes and visualizes his thoughts, so as to achieve the unity of mind and matter. Can you understand this? The answer can be said that, but I remember our teacher explained that he just thought of himself as a tiger and a lamb, and then thought like an object. So when you say "compare your mind to a tiger and a lamb, and make your thoughts concrete and visual", I think it is actually the other way around. He first regarded his body as a tiger, and then developed the tiger's thinking. It is concrete first, then abstract.