1. Xiao Fengjiu’s material composition argument
The moral of this fable can be understood from two perspectives. One is to look at the problem from the standpoint of a turtle dove: if you are not recognized in an environment, you should reflect on your own problems or shortcomings instead of escaping. Only by facing your own shortcomings and improving them can you be welcomed by everyone. The other is that we look at the problem from the owl's point of view. The owl is not escaping, but looking for an environment that can accommodate itself. The owl's singing is due to its nature, and it is also the essential attribute that distinguishes the owl from other birds. If the owl is not around in the middle of the night, It screams miserably, so is it still an owl? Since the owl is not its fault and the environment cannot accommodate it, what's wrong with it wanting to change the environment? Just because "the group doesn't like it" does it mean that the individuals in it must change their nature and be accommodated? Today's era is an era of expressing individuality. How should we retain our individuality in group life? How do groups treat individual personalities? How to respect both individuality and individuality?
Explain that this fable warns people that when dealing with their own major shortcomings and certain major problems, they must fundamentally solve them. They cannot just talk about things and avoid conflicts like the owl moving. Such problems cannot be solved. . 2. Composition about Xiao Fengjiu
Original text
Xiao (owl) meets turtle (turtle dove). Jiu said: "I will be in peace with you?" Xiao said: "I will move eastward." Jiu said: "Why?" Xiao said: "The country people (local people) hate my name. So I will move east." Jiu said: "If you can sing more loudly, that's fine; if you can't sing louder, moving eastward will still sound like a bad son."
--Liu Xiang's "Shuoyuan·Tancong"
[Edit this paragraph]? Reference translation?
The owl met the turtle dove, and the turtle dove asked it: "Where are you going (to settle down)?" The owl said: "I plan to migrate to the east. "The turtle dove asked: "Why?" The owl said, "Everyone in the village hates my hoot, so I plan to move east." The turtle dove said, "As long as you can change your hoot." You can't change your cry. Even if you move eastward, the people in the village will still hate your cry."
Student reference translation
The owl met the dove. The dove said: "Where do you plan to settle down?"
The owl said: "I am going to move to the east."
The dove said: "Why?"
< p> The owl said: "People here hate my chirping. It is for this reason that (I) want to move east."The dove said: "You can change the chirping, you can move eastward." Move; you can't change the sound of your call. If you move to the east (people there) will still hate your call."
[Edit this paragraph] Students' reference to short word and sentence analysis
Xiao. : xiāo, also known as 鸹(xiū liú), a bird that looks like an owl. Dove is the collective name for turtle doves, pheasant doves, etc., which are shaped like pigeons.
Zijiang Anzhi: Where do you plan to go (to settle down), the other person’s honorific name. Will, plan, prepare. Ann, where. Here comes.
Meet: meet, encounter.
Eastward migration (xí): moving eastward.
Evil (wù): hate, hate.
Why: What reason. Therefore: reason.
Therefore: therefore.
With: because.
Update (gēng): change.
Both: All
[Edit this paragraph] Explanation
This fable warns people to deal with their major shortcomings and some major problems in a cautious way. To solve the problem fundamentally, we can't just talk about it and avoid conflicts like an owl moving. This way the problem cannot be solved. "The Owl Meets the Dove", also known as "The Owl Will Migrate East", is an animal fable. "Owl" is an owl (a kind of bird), which is an unlucky bird in legend. Because its calls mostly occur in the middle of the night and its screams are shrill, it is not liked by people. Xiao realized this and decided to move. But the turtle dove told it: Unless it changes its cry, that is, changes its living habits, no matter where it moves, it will not be welcomed by others.
[Edit this paragraph] Meaning
The meaning of this fable can be understood from two perspectives. One is to look at the problem from the standpoint of a turtle dove: if you are not recognized in an environment, you should reflect on your own problems or shortcomings instead of escaping. Only by facing your own shortcomings and improving them can you be welcomed by everyone.
The other is that we look at the problem from the owl's point of view. The owl is not escaping, but looking for an environment that can accommodate itself. The owl's singing is due to its nature, and it is also the essential attribute that distinguishes the owl from other birds. If the owl is not around in the middle of the night, It screams miserably, so is it still an owl? Since the owl is not its fault and the environment cannot accommodate it, what's wrong with it wanting to change the environment? Just because "the group doesn't like it" does it mean that the individuals in it must change their nature and be accommodated? Today's era is an era of expressing individuality. How should we retain our individuality in group life? How do groups treat individual personalities? How to respect both individuality and individuality? 3. Materials for the composition of "Owls Meet Doves".
1. Extraordinary (innovative ideas) History has eloquently proved countless times: when a person faces the world's accusations, he is a sage if he does not betray.
As the saying goes, "I am different because of myself," I cannot change when everyone despises me. Because it is the quality and difference of my existence.
Just like an owl after being scolded by locals, it wants to migrate to other places, just because others hate its voice. Little did you know, it was the characteristics of its voice that marked it as an owl, not a melodious lark.
I have my thoughts and I have the right to make my voice. This is not only self-confidence, but also respect for life. Life in nature is diverse and has its own characteristics, thus maintaining the ecological balance and the diversity of the world. How can a life that has evolved over millions of years change its characteristics due to human likes and dislikes? What's more, the person who makes a sound that is hated by everyone does not necessarily mean that he is wrong. On the contrary, he is very likely to be an Illuminati.
Bruno, the pioneer of science, was tortured as a "heretic" until he was burned in fire. However, he did not give up or change his voice until his death. His teachings were turned into gold and steel in the fire and passed down to future generations.
Not only Bruno, but also Copernicus and Galileo, they all risked the disdain of the world. Dare to stick to scientific truth, no matter how much people hate them for burying their cries, time will eventually test everything.
Only future generations can appreciate how extraordinary these giants who stood on the cusp of history were. What is different from these people are those who easily shake their beliefs and are often buried in the depths of history.
Perhaps, such people are praised and praised for temporarily pleasing the secular world, but when the tide of history recedes, they will disappear like fine sand and be abandoned by time. The German thinker Nietzsche said: If a tree wants to grow upward and receive more light, its roots must be closer to the dark underground.
This is a wise saying. When a genius is born, he is often scorned by the world, and may even go against the path of others.
However, only by adhering to your beliefs and fighting against the darkness can you achieve the greatness of the tree! Although everyone is evil, I am willing to go! Even though he died nine times, he still has no regrets! I am extraordinary because I sing passionately for the coming of the dawn of all mankind. Teacher's Brief Comment: The author has a unique idea, uses reverse thinking, and puts forward the central argument from the opposite side.
This article reminds Xiao Ming of the scientific sages Bruno, Copernicus, and Galileo, and illustrates the point of view that "what everyone hates does not necessarily mean they are wrong, and you must maintain your own individuality." It is rich in associations and extraordinary words. , with sharp language and flamboyant personality. Instructor: Wu Shaojie 2. To stop the boiling water is like pulling out the fuel from the bottom of the cauldron Huang Jiazhao A wise man knows how to solve problems fundamentally.
The unwiseness of the owl in the material lies in the fact that he only knows how to migrate and does not know how to reflect. It only knows how to escape the environment, but fails to grasp the fundamental reason why people hate it.
As everyone knows, "You can sing more, but you can't, and you can't escape people's disgust by moving eastward." Therefore, it is better to "remove fuel from the bottom of the cauldron" completely than to just raise the pot on the surface to stop the boiling.
When encountering a problem, we should analyze it calmly and solve the problem fundamentally. Throughout history, every emperor of the past dynasties wanted to be remembered in history, loved by everyone, and well-known.
But how do they respond when they are dissatisfied and disgusted by the people? The story of King Zhou Li's slander must be known to everyone. He illustrates from the side that only harsh punishments and authoritarian prohibitions cannot fundamentally solve the boiling public resentment. The common people follow the road with their eyes, and the ministers look sideways. This is where the disaster accumulates.
The fundamental way to resolve conflicts at this time is to let people speak freely and implement policies that stabilize people's hearts and comply with public opinion. Only by fundamentally resolving the contradiction between the people and the rulers can the overall stability and prosperity of the country and the happiness of the people be ensured.
It is impossible to fundamentally resolve the boiling public dissatisfaction if it is just suppression and autocracy. Public dissatisfaction is like boiling water. If you want to eliminate public dissatisfaction, forcibly restricting people's speech will only stoke the boiling water and treat the symptoms but not the root cause.
And if we can comply with public opinion and put the people first, we can remove the firepower from the bottom and solve the problem fundamentally. In modern society, the approach of fundamentally solving problems has not lost its truth and effectiveness.
If enterprises want to escape from depression and downturn, only changing the form without thinking deeply about the fundamentals will only lead to further retreat of the enterprise. Only by grasping the core and fundamentals, actively responding to the core problems faced by the enterprise, and fundamentally Only by changing the management system and the operating mechanism of the enterprise so that the enterprise can better adapt to the development of society and people's needs can it fundamentally get rid of the predicament and move towards maturity. As a student in the third year of high school, solving problems fundamentally teaches us that we should fundamentally improve and improve ourselves in our studies, and never be like owls migrating eastward.
Being busy all day long leads to nothing. Only by thinking deeply about your own mistakes, finding out the root causes, taking active actions, and adopting practical and effective methods to improve your abilities can you better deal with the thorns and confusions on the road to learning.
We should not be like owls who only know how to move eastward but do not know how to think deeply. When we encounter problems, we should not just stir up the pot to stop the boiling. Teacher's Brief Comment This article uses the two idioms "raising the soup to stop the boiling" and "drawing out the fuel from the cauldron" to innovatively explain the relationship between treating the symptoms and the root cause.
The title of the article is novel and unique, and it uses two idioms to cleverly explain the main argument of the entire article. The article uses three arguments for governing the country, managing enterprises, and students' studies. The use of arguments from ancient times to the present can be said to be carried out step by step and advanced layer by layer.
When giving arguments for governing the country, people's grievances are vividly compared to boiling water, the monarch's tyranny is likened to "raising the soup to stop it from boiling", and benevolent government is likened to "drawing fuel from the bottom of the cauldron". It vividly explains to us the necessity of treating both the symptoms and the root cause.
The other two examples are close to reality and life. They not only demonstrate the point of view well, but are also full of the flavor of the times, they have very important practical significance. 4. An essay about Xiao Fengjiu
Flowing water never rots Yu Yinjie, Class 14, Grade 2006, Xinjin Middle School, Sichuan Province. Just as the earth is square, children have corners to hide in; but the earth is round, and we Having to face the world.
——Inscription: I have never thought quietly, thinking that happiness is inevitable, and everything I have is so natural. Wandering in this world, looking for the sweetest red apples, looking for the forgotten golden leaves, looking for the faintly flickering light in my heart.
However, after stumbling along with Jimmy, I realized that some things cannot be forced. Human beings are really limited, and there are too many things I can't change, but at least, I can change myself.
Before I understood this, I chose to escape. Thinking that everyone in the world is rejecting you, you live in a corner of the world like an abandoned baby, fending for itself; like a lily in the mountains, blooming alone and withering alone.
However, the corner never existed, so it had to be hidden in plain sight. Although I hope, I never dare to question Jehovah: This is life.
Because I am so afraid that the heaven that will collapse in an instant will suffocate me. I have no choice but to spend these long and confusing years, thinking that maybe I should not escape from the beginning, but choose to change.
Could it be that I was the one who was wrong? I saw a passage from Nietzsche: Stubbornness is an internal disease. I wrote with absolute peace of mind: I cannot be as determined as Haizi, so I have to survive until now, but since I am alive, I cannot live casually.
Putting down the pen, I thought, I have passed through the darkness. "I observe the world with one eye, and examine myself with the other eye."
Following the example of this Italian painter, with the attitude of "I examine myself three times a day," the same book The moonlight night is short, but the world is very big. Running water never rots, and it seems that change can make life better. Perhaps in the end, we still can't change things in the world, but the meaning of life lies in the direction we strive for, not where we are.
Since life is just a period of time borrowed from God, why bother to stick to history books? Why not set up a wordless monument in a unique way and then wander around the world. There is a bishop's epitaph engraved behind Westminster Abbey: At first, I wanted to change the country.
But in my old age, I still had nothing to gain, so I tried to change my family, but they ignored my teachings. It wasn't until I was about to die that I discovered that if I had learned to change myself from the beginning, I might have been able to change my family and then the country. And later on, who knows, maybe the world could have been changed because of me. 5. An argumentative composition based on Xiao Fengjiu’s materials is urgently needed
Question review method: trace the cause from the effect.
As a result, the people in the village still hate the reason why the owl moved to the east. The problem has not been solved fundamentally. Instead of changing the environment, it is better to change yourself and treat the symptoms than to treat the root cause. Recognize your own shortcomings and find appropriate ways to improve yourself to win. Social identity lies in improving one's own principles. The moral of the fable can be understood from two perspectives. One is to look at the problem from the standpoint of a turtle dove: if you are not recognized in an environment, you should reflect on your own problems or shortcomings instead of escaping. Only by facing your own shortcomings and improving them can you be welcomed by everyone.
The other way is that we look at the problem from the owl's point of view. The owl is not escaping, but looking for an environment that can accommodate itself. The owl's singing is due to its nature and is what distinguishes the owl from other birds. Essential attributes, if the owl doesn't scream sadly in the middle of the night, is it still an owl? Since the owl is not its fault and the environment cannot accommodate it, what's wrong with it wanting to change the environment? Just because "the group doesn't like it" does it mean that the individuals in it must change their nature and be accommodated? Today's era is an era of expressing individuality. How should we retain our individuality in group life? How do groups treat individual personalities? How to respect both individuality and individuality? Explain that this fable warns people that when dealing with their own major shortcomings and certain major problems, they must fundamentally solve them. They cannot just talk about things and avoid conflicts like an owl moving, because such problems cannot be solved. 6. Composition about Xiao Fengjiu
Running water does not rot
Yu Yinjie, Class 14, Grade 2006, Xinjin Middle School, Sichuan Province
How is the square shape of the earth, children? There are corners to hide in; but the earth is round, and we have to face the world.
——Inscription
I have never thought quietly, thinking that happiness is inevitable, and everything I have is so natural. Wandering in this world, looking for the sweetest red apples, looking for the forgotten golden leaves, looking for the faintly flickering light in my heart. However, after stumbling along with Jimi, I realized that some things cannot be forced. Human beings are really limited, and there are too many things I can't change, but at least, I can change myself.
Before I understood this, I chose to escape. Thinking that everyone in the world is rejecting you, you live in a corner of the world like an abandoned baby, fending for itself; like a lily in the mountains, blooming alone and withering alone. However, the corner never existed and had to be hidden in plain sight. Although I hope, I never dare to question Jehovah: This is life. Because I am so afraid
The heaven that collapses in that instant will suffocate me. I have no choice but to spend these long and confusing years, thinking that maybe I shouldn't escape from the beginning, but choose to change. Could it be that I was the one who was wrong?
See a passage from Nietzsche: Stubbornness is an internal disease. I wrote with absolute peace of mind: I cannot be as determined as Haizi, so I have to survive until now, but since I am alive, I cannot live casually. Putting down the pen, I thought, I have passed through the darkness. "I observe the world with one eye, and examine myself with the other eye." Following the example of this Italian painter, with the attitude of "I examine myself three times a day," I talk to the world in the book, The Moonlight Night is Very Short , that world is huge.
Flowing water never erodes, and it seems that change can make life better. Perhaps in the end, we still cannot change things in the world, but the meaning of life lies in the direction we strive for, not where we are. Since life is just a period of time borrowed from God, why bother to stick to history books? Why not be creative and set up a wordless monument, and then stroll around the world.
There is a bishop’s epitaph engraved behind Westminster Abbey: At first, I wanted to change this country. But in my old age, I still had nothing to gain, so I tried to change my family, but they ignored my teachings. It wasn't until I was about to die that I discovered that if I had learned to change myself from the beginning, I might have been able to change my family and then the country. And later on, who knows, maybe the world could have been changed because of me. 7. I am looking for an argumentative essay using Xiao Mengjiu as the material, preferably 600 words.
Question review method: trace the cause through the effect. As a result, Xiao moved to the east and people in the village still hated the reason. The problem was not fundamentally solved. Instead of changing the environment, it was better to change oneself and treat the symptoms than the root cause. Recognize one's own shortcomings and find appropriate ways to improve oneself. To win social recognition, it is to improve one's own nature. The moral of the fable can be understood from two perspectives. One is to look at the problem from the standpoint of a turtle dove: if you are not recognized in an environment, you should reflect on your own problems or shortcomings instead of escaping. Only by facing your own shortcomings and improving them can you be welcomed by everyone. The other is that we look at the problem from the owl's point of view. The owl is not escaping, but looking for an environment that can accommodate itself. The owl's singing is due to its nature, and it is also the essential attribute that distinguishes the owl from other birds. If the owl is not around in the middle of the night, It screams miserably, so is it still an owl? Since the owl is not its fault and the environment cannot accommodate it, what's wrong with it wanting to change the environment? Just because "the group doesn't like it" does it mean that the individuals in it must change their nature and be accommodated? Today's era is an era of expressing individuality. How should we retain our individuality in group life? How do groups treat individual personalities? How to respect both individuality and individuality?
Explain that this fable warns people that when dealing with their own major shortcomings and certain major problems, they must fundamentally solve them. They cannot just talk about things and avoid conflicts like the owl moving. This problem cannot be solved. .
Hello classmate, if the problem has been solved, remember to accept it in the upper right corner~~~Your acceptance is my affirmation~Thank you 8. Composition Read the following materials and compose as required
Omitted
This topic is a material composition. First of all, you must clarify the meaning of the material. Because it is classical Chinese, it is difficult to understand on the surface, but you can grasp the main idea as long as you understand the last sentence. The meaning of this paragraph: The owl met the turtle dove, and the turtle dove asked it: "Where are you going?" The owl said: "I plan to move to the east." The turtle dove asked: "What reason?" The owl said: "Everyone in the village is They hate my chirping, so they move eastward." The turtle dove said, "You just need to change your chirping. If you don't change your chirping, the people in the village will still hate your chirping. .
From Turtle Dove’s words, we can draw the conclusion that the owl is annoying because of its hoot. If you don’t change yourself, it will be the same wherever you go. Therefore, when writing this article, you can start from the following three points. Aspects of intention:
1. Instead of changing the environment, it is better to change yourself to treat the symptoms than to treat the root cause.
2. Recognize your own shortcomings and find appropriate ways to improve yourself.
p>
3. Winning social recognition lies in improving oneself. 9. A 500-word essay on Xiao Fengjiu
It can be understood from two perspectives.
One is standing. Look at the problem from the turtle dove's point of view: If you are not recognized in an environment, you should reflect on your own problems or shortcomings instead of escaping. Only by facing your own shortcomings and improving them can you be welcomed by everyone. The other is us. Looking at the problem from the owl's point of view, the owl is not escaping, but looking for an environment that can accommodate itself. The owl's cry is due to its nature, and it is also the essential attribute that distinguishes the owl from other birds. If the owl does not scream sadly in the middle of the night, then Is it still an owl? Since the owl is not its fault and the environment cannot tolerate it, what's wrong with it wanting to change the environment? Just because "the group doesn't like it", it must change its nature. Accommodation? Today is an era of individuality. How should we retain our individuality in group life? How should the group respect individuality and individuality?