The composition of college entrance examination materials requires quoting materials but not quoting them. Is that a digression? How many points are deducted?

There are six kinds of mistakes in the composition of college entrance examination materials. For the composition type of a given material, we should first "analyze" the text of the given material in order to find out the ideas that can be used to play. The word of concern is called "viewpoint", and the writing direction established in this way is called "intention point" In 2009, the composition questions of Shanghai college entrance examination, from the point of view of the types of questions, are all compositions for materials. Original title of composition: Choose an angle according to the following materials and make your own topic. Requirements: ① Choose your own angle and make your own ideas. (2) Except for poetry, the style is not limited. ③ No less than 800 words. Zheng Banqiao's calligraphy is based on official script and running script, which is called "Banqiao Style". The single font of his works seems crooked, but the overall feeling is patchy and unique. Some people say that "you can't have your cake and eat it". Below, we make a careful analysis of the materials and words given in the composition questions of the 2009 college entrance examination. The "viewpoints" in the raw materials and the corresponding "intention points" are shown in the following table: From the examination, it can be seen that the materials given in the composition questions in 2009 are not difficult to write, and there are many angles to play. Candidates should be able to combine their own advantages and write personalized thinking. However, judging from the actual situation of marking the composition of the college entrance examination, it is regrettable to find that the phenomenon of dividing subjects is serious, and many candidates' compositions always have the problem that the total average score is lower than the expected target value. The main reason for the mistake is that I don't know the basic writing norms of "writing for materials", which affects the effect of the composition and puts the reviewers in a dilemma when judging. "It's not easy to say I love you." When marking the composition of the college entrance examination in 2009, it was found that candidates' mistakes in the Basic Norms for Writing Materials were mainly manifested in the following aspects: 1. The whole article has no cited materials (neither cited nor overlapped). Compared with proposition composition, it is more difficult to give material composition. It doesn't directly tell you what to write, but it also implies a subtext: giving material is the reason that triggers your writing. So when you write an argumentative paper, it's called "what happened by accident". Of course, you should quote, but in what position, the skill and level of quoting vary from person to person (as long as you don't copy the original text). Of course, if you write a narrative and use events or stories to prove and express something implied in a given material, you don't need and can't quote the material. 2. Wearing a hat and boots. Some candidates quoted materials at the beginning and end of the article, but did not analyze them; The statements of other candidates have nothing to do with the given materials cited at the beginning. Like dreams. Quote the Banqiao case first and then discuss: "This is the characteristic of Banqiao, what about me?" There's nothing. I have a dream since I was a child, to be an athlete and to be like Yao Ming and Liu Xiang. "Then I recalled the injury experience and fear of 14 when he was studying baseball in a sports school. Finally, I encouraged myself: "I believe that time will dilute everything and let me realize my dream." "The text has nothing to do with the material of Banqiao, and it belongs to the typical type of' putting on a hat' and throwing it away. I will only give 38 points for such an article. 3. The idea of writing a composition for the material should be a similar association made directly from the material, and there is an inevitable connection between the viewpoint and the material. However, some candidates, after many turns, drift away ambitiously and digress. The article expresses ideas, which are not rigorous and will lead to heavy points and points deduction. For example, the structure and content of Essential Pursuit are as follows: (1) Give the materials given. (2) Discussion: Words are like people. " "Banqiao Style" has unique charm and embodies Zheng Xie's unique personality. Yes, he is not afraid of secular sarcasm, insists on his own pursuit, and has achieved his unique development path. And what is my pursuit? Where is my value? (3) Narrator: I once read The Old Man and the Sea, San Diego ... (summarizing the plot of the novel). Comment: What I understand is that people should pursue dignity and never fail lightly. (4) End of discussion: Thanks to the old man and the sea, which taught me philosophy and is my unique pursuit, and will take me further. This kind of article is really "further", and I think it can only give 35 points. 4. Only grasp a few words, apply a few words in the material, and don't understand the connotation, which leads to deviation from the meaning of the question. For example, "love money but not enough", let's start with the beginning: the word "love money" is always despised, but I don't think so. Although "love money" is "crooked" in some people's eyes, proper love of money, as long as it is not excessive, can inspire people to make progress and be respected. In the second and third paragraphs, Bill Gates' pursuit of wealth and charity is cited as a positive example, and Grandet's stingy collection of money is cited as a counterexample. Finally, I quoted Confucius as saying, "Ill-gotten wealth is as expensive as floating clouds to me". The article only deals with the word "crooked" in the given materials, and the full text has nothing to do with Banqiao calligraphy. I think this kind of article is 25 points at most. 5. Explain the profound implication of the given material with a more naive enlightenment story. Although this writing is not off topic, it is not profound and can pass, but the score is not high. For example, there is an article called "The Four Seasons of Pear Trees", which tells about a farmer who showed his four sons how pear trees looked in spring, summer, autumn and winter, and then educated them not to pay attention to only one season to see beauty and charm. The truth contained here coincides with the meaning of "a single font looks crooked, but the overall feeling is patchy and unique", expressing the view of "looking at the problem comprehensively and integrally", but this story belongs to low-context material, which may be a good composition in junior high school students' articles, but it can only be considered mediocre compared with the thinking level of senior three, with about 46 points. 6. A set of questions. The set of questions is worse than digression, and it is easier to arouse the "public anger" of the reviewers, and the heavy penalty will be below 30 points. For example, the essay topic of the mock exam in Pudong New Area in 2009 is also a composition aimed at materials: Should life be a "hidden front" or an "exposed front"? As a result, some candidates in the college entrance examination wrote a set of essays, "Hidden and Exposed Life"; There are also candidates who set the composition "half art" in other aspects, which will not be worth the candle. So what writing norms should "write for the material" follow? The basic requirement of the composition type of "writing for materials" is to first extract the hidden facts from the given materials, and then make them happen by accident, which is similar to the thinking associated with society and life, and similar to deductive reasoning in the way of thinking. Basic specification requirements: 1. According to the key points in the material, establish the viewpoint, so as to determine the direction of conception. 2. Don't talk about things. After putting forward the reasons, it should be similar to Lenovo and analogize to a deeper and wider field to write a sense of hierarchy. (such as: nature → society → life → governing the country → the world) 3. When writing, you should quote materials and take events as the basis (quote as much as possible, but don't copy) to avoid the suspicion of setting topics. 4. Make full use of the given materials, analyze and contact the materials themselves, and avoid the suspicion of "wearing boots and hats". For example, to talk about "uniqueness", it is necessary to analyze in detail how Zheng Banqiao achieved "uniqueness"? For example, his study and persistence in others; If we talk about "integration" again, we should explain how Zheng Banqiao "integrates" hundreds of schools. (For example, learn from others-"Use official script to participate in running script"; Breaking the door view-"not official and not modern"; For example, the article "Innovation can't be self-defeating" has the following structural contents: (1) Analyze the meaning of "Banqiao style"-pursuing innovation. Question: How should we pursue innovation? (b) The analysis of knowledge and experience in Zheng Banqiao shows that innovation is based on accumulation. (3) Analyze the independent personality of Zheng Banqiao and the Eight Eccentrics in Yangzhou, and demonstrate that innovation has rich connotations. (4) The purpose of analyzing "Banqiao Style" is to revitalize calligraphy and demonstrate that innovation has a lofty purpose, rather than being unconventional and whimsical. This kind of article, which is closely related to the central argument and makes full use of the given materials for concrete analysis, can be rated as a kind of volume.