The format of modern poetry is changing, from no punctuation now being fashionable to punctuation not at the end of the sentence but within the line.
Poems I wrote before:
The Caoze River flows with beautiful curves,
The Caoze River flows with beautiful rhythms,
The Caoze River flows with the meaning of poetry and painting,
The Caoze River flows with the rhythm of poetry,
The Caoze River has revelations about the rhythm of language,
< p>Add a pause after each sentence of the poem,This is also a rhythm. Is this rhythm unnatural?
Is there any limitations to this rhythm?
The flowing water of Caoze River is moving.
Does the moving water seem to stop every sentence?
Poetry should be natural,
as natural as the flowing water of the Caoze River.
Are those neat and consistent pauses natural?
I think poetry should be as natural as flowing clouds and flowing water.
I am also like some poets who change the end of a sentence.
I use the advantage of branching to express it. The rhythm of the poem is beautiful.
My revised poem:
The Caoze River flows
The curves are beautiful, the Caoze River flows
The rhythm is beautiful, The Caoze River flows
the poetic meaning of love and painting,
The Caoze River flows
the rhythm of the poem,
About The rhythm of language
The Caoze River has enlightenment.
Add a pause after each sentence of the poem.
This is also rhythm, this kind of rhythm
Unnatural? Does this rhythm have limitations?
Is there any limitation?
The flowing water of the Caoze River is
moving. If the moving water
does it stop at the end of its course?
Poetry should be natural, as natural as
the flowing water of the Caoze River. Is the neat
unanimous pause natural? I think
Poems should be as natural as flowing clouds and flowing water.
I am also like some poets
who change the way they stop a sentence.
Use the advantage of branch lines
to reflect the rhythmic beauty of the poem.