Rhythmic poetry couplets all have metrical requirements. Since most netizens who like poetry couplets do not understand the rhythm, they have to make judgments based on the "artistic conception". But the artistic conception is impossible to unify. For example, vulgarity or elegance, each has its own feeling. As long as it does not violate laws, regulations and social morality, it is difficult to conclude that the three vulgarities or the six elegances are true. Since the vast majority of enthusiasts come here for fun, there seems to be no need to discuss level. In my humble opinion, the works of many good writers who often serve netizens are good when evaluated as modern poetry. I just ask the netizens of the poetry couplet to be basically satisfied. As for those who conform to the meter, let alone here, few of the nationally famous "acrostic" poets understand it. Writing metrical poetry couplets is similar to writing English compositions, both have their own requirements. It’s not just about using good words to make a grammatically messed up sentence.
Many old people in the Sina Poetry Column know that a high score does not mean a high level of poetry couplets. Because the couplets of poetry are obvious. It is easier to work with irregularities, but it is difficult to show the true level of the work.
Ri Qiucunjin and some other regulars are good players. But it’s really hard to learn real poetry couplets here.
Thank you for the invitation. The fallacies are based on my humble opinion. If there is any offense or inappropriateness, please forgive Haihan.
I wish all teams continuous progress! Netizens are happy every day!