What are the misspelled words in ancient books?

He said: "People with the same pronunciation but different meanings don't know vulgar Confucianism, so they won't make mistakes. That is to say, as long as one initiator takes typos as standard words, it will mislead a large number of people." A typo is a typo. Words are really used for reading, but written in books is used for reading. Because you need to borrow other characters, which is different from interchangeable characters, which have their own characters and are replaced by other characters. They are different in essence, but there is a certain connection between the borrowing of interchangeable characters and the borrowing of six books, which provides theoretical support for interchangeable characters.

For example, if, suppose. The pronunciation of these two is [ji m]. Another meaning is to leave work or study places temporarily according to regulations or requirements, such as holidays, winter and summer vacations. The pronunciation here is [jià]. However, when expressing negative meaning, the word "day" was added, which became the new word "dusk". The two characters are linked by both grapheme and phonetics, making them interchangeable characters in ancient and modern times.

The common word is "only hear its voice, but not its words." To be clear, there was no such word in ancient times, only this sound. What should I do? I have to borrow a homophone word, that is, "tongjiazi". In Chinese, negative words are generally lip sounds, which are all negative words, such as "no, no, no". When The Analects of Confucius is compiled into a book, the word "micro" is used to mean "no" and "no".

There are two kinds of interchangeable words: the original has its own words and the original does not have its own words. The former is because there are not many original words in ancient times, and it is difficult to make a suitable word for some abstract concepts, which leads to the absence of original words. As for the latter, please see the next article. In the process of modernization, the correctness of standardization improves efficiency. Especially in the computer age, standardization will be more operational. This is the need of the times. With the development of the times, the number of Chinese characters has gradually increased. The word in the past may not have that meaning today. However, in this case, you can't say that the ancients wrote typos, can you?