But now is a time of peace. We have the ability, energy, time and conditions, and we should know some thoughts and viewpoints of the ancients. Besides, many ancient books, such as Historical Records, Nine Chapters of Arithmetic and Water Mirror Notes, are not valuable wealth? All are things that our Chinese nation should be proud of. How can we not look at them? Which one is not in classical Chinese? Therefore, learning the cultural thoughts of the ancients, taking its essence and discarding its dross can make people wise and profound. Therefore, learning classical Chinese is very useful.
2. Why do modern people learn classical Chinese? First of all, we should not simply judge a subject or a certain knowledge by usefulness and uselessness. Useful and useless are relative, and we can't say useless just because we don't need it or don't like it at present.
Secondly, at present, our vernacular Chinese evolved from classical Chinese, with a history of only a hundred years. How can I forget my roots? Third, although we don't use classical Chinese, many words commonly used in our lives have retained classical Chinese, which is difficult to understand without learning.
For example, how many people know the meaning of "forgive me"? See refers to me, the patient. Just, forgive me, just, forgive me.
Thirdly, we can easily find that many ancient poems can still infect us. For example, exhortation to learn, the theory of six countries, and the preface to Lanting collection are too numerous to mention.
Finally, classical Chinese plays an important role in cultivating sentiment. At the same time, there are still many people who like classical Chinese.
I hope you can read more ancient poems. After all, China is famous for its profoundness. But the situation is sad.
The foundation of China culture cannot be lost.
Debate why it is not necessary to learn classical Chinese. Sorry, this is my opinion, contrary to yours.
Although classical Chinese has long been called a street rat by people in the New Culture Movement, I think it still has its own advantages compared with vernacular Chinese, and it is not without its merits. Both have their own advantages. If you can make the best use of the situation and add a little ancient prose to your usual articles, you will certainly be more brilliant.
In my opinion, the greatest advantage of classical Chinese over vernacular Chinese is that it is more magnificent and can express extremely strong feelings. However, the effect of Bai Wen is obviously inferior. If you just add some exclamations like "Ah, Ah, Ba", the expression of feelings will be somewhat feminine.
For example, there is a saying in Han Yu's evaluation of Zhang Xun: whoever is immortal in the world has the credit! Simple and shocking. If it's Bai Wen, it's his credit that the country didn't die! The effect comparison is clear at a glance.
There is also Jia Yi's "On Qin": there is a heart that sweeps the world, accepts the world, accepts the meaning of the four seas, and devours the eight wastes. This momentum is beyond the reach of popular literature.
In the 1960s, before the Sino-Indian War, China's last words to India were: Don't say you didn't expect it! If you say: Don't say I didn't tell you in advance! The tone contrast is obviously stronger and more shocking. Su Zhe said: The shape of the writer's qi is also.
There are countless ups and downs in China's ancient poems, but on the other hand, most of them are as plain as a river and compared to a river. It is better to tell the truth.
When it comes to Qi being a writer, we have to mention Sima Qian's "Report to Ren 'an". Many students didn't understand the specific meaning of the article at first, so did I.
But then I read it carefully and was finally impressed by Tai Shigong's literary talent. The article is mainly emotional, with a word and a tear, passionate, passionate and heartbreaking.
Telling the whole story, experience, thoughts and aspirations seems to be sobbing, but it seems to be lamenting and generous. If you have such feelings, you will be rich in arrangement, confrontation and metaphor, telling the past and discussing the present, and you will be consistent, like a raging river! It is not too much to say that this article can be compared with the sun and the moon.
Is there such a heroic article in vernacular Chinese? "Today, I have lost my shape as a slave sweeper. In the middle of velvet, I want to hold my head high and stretch my eyebrows. It is not only a light court, but also a shame of evil! Ha ha! Ha ha! If you are a servant, what can you say? What are you talking about? " "If the servant is punished, what is the difference between nine cows and ants?" "Moreover, zang zang male and female servants, also can make a decision, if the servant had to? Therefore, those who live in seclusion in dirt and never leave are selfish, have no world, and their literary talent is not obvious in future generations. " "Servants are responsible for former humiliation. Although I was killed, do you still have regrets? However, this can be the way of the wise, but it is difficult for laymen to say it! " "Servants suffered this disaster in oral English, and they laughed for the hard time emerging to humiliate their ancestors. How can they face their parents' graves? Although always tired, but the dirt is very eye-catching! It is because the intestines are nine times a day that you will suddenly die if you live in them, but when you go out, you don't know where to go.
" ...................................................................................................................................................... .......................... For students who like articles, I suggest that you must read China's View on Ancient Literature, which is basically the essence of China's traditional literature, and it is more than 100 times stronger than the general selection of vernacular literature. Secondly, another great advantage of classical Chinese is that it is concise, precise and not sloppy, and there is absolutely no childlike and feminine state of modern Chinese.
There is a story like this: When Ouyang Xiu was working in the Hanlin Academy, he once went out with three subordinates in the same academy and saw a galloping horse stepping on a dog on the side of the road. He described it in just a few words, as if: escaped from the horseshoe and killed the dog on the road.
There is also an allusion: the public did not cross the river, but the public really crossed the river. What if I fall into the river and die? The sentence is concise to the extreme, and only 16 words describe a complete event.
The most surprising thing is that it also contains the author's helplessness and sadness. Because of simplicity, the effect of this emotion is strengthened from the opposite side.
Throughout modern literature, where can there be such a sharp article that people can read so incisively and vividly? Of course, China traditional literature has also gone through some misunderstandings, such as parallel prose in Wei and Jin Dynasties, which seriously restricted the expression of literary meaning. But if you use a small amount of parallel prose in your writing, it will be another artistic conception.
For example, Du Mu's A Fang Gong Fu, which everyone is familiar with, has a vaguely discernible parallel prose style, but after he changed it, it became an immortal work with beautiful writing and flexible sentence patterns. Of course, classical Chinese also has many shortcomings.
Because of conciseness, I don't pay much attention to details, so I can't dig deep into the nuances of the incident. Generally speaking, ancient prose is based on the overall situation and has the spirit of taking care of the overall situation.
The vernacular Chinese, on the other hand, is magnificent and biased, picking up more descriptions and discussions on details, highlighting the slow development process of people's psychology and the cause and effect of things, and describing feelings more delicately. Nowadays, many people say that classical Chinese is useless, and those who study classical Chinese are just wasting their time.
I despise such remarks very much. Classical Chinese is the biggest carrier of our traditional culture.
Vernacular is only a few years old. Can we inherit our great Chinese civilization? People who say such things really forget their ancestors. They said: classical Chinese is not easy to be understood by ordinary peddlers and pawns, which hinders the popularization and circulation of knowledge.
I don't think so. It is really extreme to abandon classical Chinese to vernacular Chinese in the New Culture Movement. There is no buffer zone for cultural change.
They say that people like the scribes are self-righteous with some difficult and abstruse words and don't contact the broad masses. Therefore, this language should be abolished. But as we all know, people who specialize in difficult sentences are not representatives of classical Chinese, and the real classical Chinese is gradually moving closer to the public. The languages in The Book of Songs were eliminated as early as two thousand years ago.
In addition, at that time, anyone who could read a few words didn't have too many obstacles to read classical Chinese. For example, Romance of the Three Kingdoms is mostly written in classical Chinese with a little vernacular elements.
Who can read but can't speak? I like the Three Kingdoms, but his historical stories are very attractive. One of the most important reasons is that he basically wrote in classical Chinese, and the tone of describing the war is quite heroic! Look at the vernacular three kingdoms again. It's really hard to read. Turning the words into white is actually a lack of confidence caused by the invasion of western culture, which is really a loss of China culture.
Isn't it suggested that Chinese characters be changed from waste Chinese characters?
4. The 10 reason why contemporary society does not need to learn classical Chinese is 1. I think classical Chinese is very unnecessary to learn.
Because it is useless to our daily life.
Just like we go shopping.
You need to use language, you need to use calculation, and occasionally you need to talk in English when you walk down the street.
But when shall we speak in classical Chinese?
Classical Chinese is too far away from us
Although it is a traditional culture.
But I find that this traditional culture is just a great burden.
We have to take a lot of things.
It's really a waste to recite those classical Chinese that are meaningless to life.
I don't like the so-called "This is the splendid culture of China people".
No matter how brilliant it is, if it aggravates our study tasks, it will have no effect on ourselves.
What's the point?
The usage of those words and words
It has nothing to do with today's language use.
Every time I see it,
It feels like watching astronomy.
I'll give you the original.
1
The so-called "selfishness" of the Fifth Lun is human nature. For example, the friendship with an old friend and affection for his son, Wu Lun is more plump, authentic and credible, and such "selfishness" can highlight his true selflessness, fairness and integrity.
The original text is dedicated to the public. It is selfless for philosophers to admonish, reprimand, and seal the base. This man is naturally embarrassed and has less literary talent, but the paper is called and praised in front of everyone. But if you don't learn from it and cultivate dignity, you can look down on it. Or ask Karen, "Is it public or private?" He said to me, "In the past, there was a swift horse beside me. Although I didn't accept it, I have an election every three times. I can't forget it, but it's not necessary. Brother and son are often sick, go up ten times a night and retire to sleep; My son is ill, but he doesn't sleep at night. If so, is that selfless? " Note 1. Aaron: Fifth Aaron, Minister of the Eastern Han Dynasty. 2. Cheap: refers to things that are beneficial to the country. 3. Gifts: respect and honesty. 4. Gong Yu: Minister of Western Han Dynasty. It is famous for its clear classics and clean conduct. Fifth, Lun abides by the law, is loyal to his duties, and his words and deeds do not violate laws and regulations. Philosophers (talented people) are often discouraged by him, so he scolds them and drives them away. He blocked all the written opinions stated by officials that were beneficial to the country. He was so selfless. He is honest by nature and lacks literary talent. When he was an official, he was known for his incorruptibility. At that time, people compared him to Gong Yu of the Western Han Dynasty. However, he lacks tolerance and dignity, so he is looked down upon by some people. Someone asked Fifth Lun, "Are you selfish?" He replied, "Some of my old friends gave me a swift horse. Although I didn't accept it, I can't forget him every time I choose an official in the court, but I have never appointed him. My brother's son is often ill. I went to see him ten times every night, but after I came back, I slept soundly. My son is ill. Although I didn't go to see him, I couldn't sleep all night. Like this, can you say that there is no selfishness? "