1, "up" and "down" refer to the direction-indicating that the word should be divided into "up" and "down";
2. "Big" and "small" refer to the size of "proportion" and are also two parts, corresponding to "up" or "down" respectively.
3. The next step is how to divide it and where to divide it.
4. how to divide it? -divided by radicals! Chinese characters are composed of components, generally divided by "radicals"; The rest is the other part. This is the second part; The so-called "proportion of shelf structure" mainly refers to the space occupied by "radical" in the whole word relative to the rest.
5. For example:
Example 1: "laugh" and "flower"; "Bamboo prefix" and "grass prefix" are above the whole glyph, so they are counted as "upper" parts; Forget the rest. Do "bamboo prefix" and "grass prefix" occupy a small space in the whole font? Still big? Of course, it is "small"-so, it all belongs to "small on the top and big on the bottom".
Example 2: "Thinking" and "Type". "Thinking" belongs to "heart"; "Xing" belongs to "Earth" and is usually called "Angel Land" and "Earth Di Zi" respectively. The so-called "ground" means "under", which means "under". Both "heart" and "land" seem to be "small" in the whole proportion of words, so "thinking" and "shape" belong to "big but small";
Example 3: "Class" and "Importance". Their radicals are "da" and "female" respectively, and their proportions in the whole word seem to be equal up and down. So, put them in the category of "equal up and down". In fact, this just means "it seems that the ratio is almost the same". It is not really "equal up and down."
However, I feel that this does not belong to the category of "language". It belongs to the category of "writing (calligraphy)". But whether it is "Chinese" or "writing (calligraphy)", it is really useless to teach children to learn this. Writing class is even more useless. This is a waste of time. In official script, the proportion of "thinking" and "type" is just the opposite of the "standard answer"-it is "small on the top and big on the bottom". Another example: the word "Yao", in the traditional classic copybook, the word "female" is much larger than the word "west" above. Where is the "upper and lower equality"? . This division method is actually only for printed matter. If you really learn to write (calligraphy), you can't divide it like this. In fact, no one will learn writing or calligraphy according to the "shelf structure ratio" of printing.
This teaching method, in my opinion, is the bad idea of those who don't pretend to understand!
In writing class, we should talk about glyphs, but we only need to distinguish the "structural types" of words (such as up and down, left and right, up and down, left and right), and we don't need to distinguish the proportions and make detailed divisions. This is a waste of time and time. Isn't it good to spend time on more meaningful content and talk about these meaningless content?