When Mr. Qi Gong talks about seventeen posts, is there the charm of Wang Xizhi as a book saint?

Seventeen posts is Wang Xizhi's representative cursive work, because the frontispiece is named after the word "seventeen". The original has been lost, and the 17 posts handed down from generation to generation are prints. Zhang Yanyuan, a famous scholar in the Tang Dynasty, recorded 17 original inks in the Dharma Sutra: 17 of them were long 10 foot, that is, the page view 107 lines, with 943 words. It's a famous post of the Yellow River. Emperor Taizong bought the books of the two kings. There were 3,000 pieces of paper in Wang's books, which were rolled at the rate of two feet, and the traces and characters of the books were rolled.

The ancients spoke highly of seventeen posts, and the negative evaluation was almost zero. For example, Song said, "This post is easy to escape, and it is also a dragon in the book." Zhu Yue said, "If you play with his brushwork, you will get rich calmly, but you will be detached from the weather, not tied to the law, and not seeking to get rid of it." Those that flow from their own thoughts. "Some calligraphy experts think that this post is" Gu Zhuo's brushwork, with a seal. "

Qi Gong once commented on Seventeen Posts: Seventeen Posts were written calmly and without legal constraints, as if they flowed naturally from their own chests. In the post-Wang Xizhi era, famous calligraphers deliberately exerted their strength and showed their artistic style when writing, thus losing the natural beauty when writing.

Qi Gong tried to copy Seventeen Posts, which was widely circulated in later generations. Many calligraphers spoke highly of this copying work, believing that Qi Gong's copying ability is unprecedented, not only accurate, but also incorporating some personal characteristics, which is a rare masterpiece.

However, some calligraphy experts believe that Qigong's temporary works are inferior, and clever copying should be as original as possible, not a makeover. As the saying goes, the difference is a thousand miles, and the personal style of Qigong is too obvious to be copied, so it should belong to creation. At the same time, it is also suggested that younger book lovers should not have too many personal ideas when copying. The higher the degree of reduction, the more successful your replication will be. If you want to create, don't copy it, and don't make a mess.

What level do netizens think Qigong's plagiarized works belong to? Is it an unprecedented masterpiece, or is it the so-called four unlike? Please express your opinion in the comments section and we will discuss it together.