What is the difference between onegin and Yu Dafu's redundant images?

Pushkin's masterpiece follows the novel yevgeni onegin. This poetic novel widely reflects the social life of Russia in the 19 era, and is the first realistic work, which truly shows the anguish, exploration and awakening of Russian youth in that era and puts forward many important social problems. Focusing on onegin, the author accurately summarized the ideological outlook and tragic fate of some aristocratic youths who were influenced by progressive thoughts but failed to jump out of their narrow circle at that time, thus successfully shaping the image of the first "superfluous person" in Russian literature.

Onegin, an aristocratic youth in St. Petersburg, has a luxurious life path similar to that of ordinary aristocratic youth. However, the atmosphere and progressive enlightenment thoughts of that era, Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations and Rousseau's The Social Contract, and Byron's poems praising freedom and individual liberation all influenced him and changed his attitude towards reality. He began to get tired of the empty and boring life of the upper class, came to the countryside with a desire for a new life, and tried to carry out agricultural reform. However, the flashy aristocratic education didn't give him any practical working ability, and his bad habit of taking pains and relaxing left a deep imprint on him. Coupled with the criticism and opposition of the surrounding landlords, onegin is still in a state of idleness, depression and hesitation, suffering from a typical disease of the times-depression.

On the farm in the country, he became friends with Lenski and his fiancee Olga. Olga's sister tatiana is simple and affectionate. She fell in love with onegin passionately and bravely wrote to tell him her pure love, but onegin refused. After many twists and turns, the two met again. When he refused her love, he didn't know who the true feelings belonged to until they met again. However, everything has changed …

Redundant Man is a typical example of aristocratic intellectuals depicted in Russian literature in the19th century. Their characteristics are noble birth, living in a rich environment and receiving a good education. Although they have lofty ideals, they are far from the people; Although they are dissatisfied with reality, they lack action. They are "giants in thought and dwarfs in action" and can only waste their talents in cynicism. They don't want to stand on the side of the government and go along with the upper class, nor can they stand with the people against tyranny and serfdom. They like western liberalism very much, but they are also very dissatisfied with the present situation in Russia and unable to change this situation. But they are representatives of big noble's powerful people, and it is impossible for them to combine with the bottom people to change the status quo in Russia.