2. Scholar Shan Li believes that Guan Ju is not a love poem, but a wedding poem. This is a family statement. He thinks:
"Everyone has the most serious misunderstanding about the poem Guanju." Li Shan said that from the description of "the pigeon in Guanguan is in Hezhou", it belongs to the third person, which is the simplest explanation: "Do boys in the class write love poems to girls in the third person? No. "
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not love. What is this? Li Shan said that there is indeed a love factor in the poem, but it is not the pursuit of love, but the third person is congratulating. The poem is about a man who wants to get a good woman, just like a pancake. It seems simple, but it is not that easy. If it must be regarded as a love poem, it is also confined to marriage, not pursuit. "This is a wedding poem. Everyone else is married. Let's join in the fun and wish the marriage a success. "
At the same time, Shan Li also made a literal analysis of Guanju, and finally came to the conclusion that if we regard it as a love poem, we ignore the bearing contained in the poem itself. He said that China people think that marriage is the beginning of human relations, so Guan Ju was accidentally and inevitably placed in the first article of the Book of Songs.