In fact, many people don't know whether Xiaogang Feng's movies are good or not. When others say they are good, he thinks they are good.
At first, everyone said that "Fanghua" was a literary work. When he went to see it, he didn't see anything, but they all said it was good-looking, and he also said it was particularly good-looking.
Later, he said that "I am not Pan Jinlian" is particularly awesome. He went to see it. The round lens looked disgusting, but they all said it was particularly elegant. Said it was awesome, and I don't know why.
I'll tell you another joke. Don't take it seriously.
In fact, many people don't know why they want to scold Xiaogang Feng. Everyone else does, and he scolds him. As for why, I don't know. Don't believe it?
Come on, let's think together. Yin-yang contract? Did you see it with your own eyes or did someone admit it? About tax evasion? The people's tax authorities are still investigating and the person has not been convicted. Are you so clear that this is true?
Everyone scolded Xiaogang Feng only because of Mr. Cui in Cui Yongyuan, but is what Mr. Cui said true? He's a prostitute, isn't he?
Therefore, some people don't have their own position at all, and they are all chess pieces that are incited to go with the flow. When public opinion is incited to rush to Xiaogang Feng, they will swear. After a while, if Xiaogang Feng is proved innocent, Mr Cui will be accused of talking nonsense. Believe me, this wave of people will still scold Mr. Cui.
Come uninvited!
Whether the film is good or not shows how well the director has done it. That is to say, as a film director, Mr. Xiaogang Feng has withstood the test, recognition and love of the audience, which fully shows that Xiaogang Feng is a very excellent director and won the Golden Shell Award at the San Sebastian International Film Festival and the Cultural Knight Medal of France, a big film country! As a film director, he has made great achievements!
But ... but ... this does not mean Xiaogang Feng's personality, quality and so on. ...
There seems to be an unwritten rule that people who are famous and successful are perfect, but they have no shortcomings. If there are shortcomings, kill them immediately, and leave none!
But it's actually too virtuous, hahaha. It's better … maybe … it's better not to say that! Because Xiaogang Feng's fame was not decided by others, he relied on movies. Of course, you said you broke the law, which is too much. This is a social principle and must be punished! I haven't paid much attention to the news in Xiaogang Feng recently. I don't know if he broke the law. It is estimated that it is almost the same!
If he uses the director's power to oppress others in the crew, he must be condemned! However, if something happens in his private life, it's someone else's business! It's none of our business
For example, give a boiled chestnut:
On the west side of the village lives an entrepreneur who leads the whole village to get rich! It is the chairman's enterprise that has achieved fruitful results, and the income is quite rich. The income in the village has doubled, and everyone is very happy ~ But this chairman is a bit lewd, and he loves women if he doesn't love money! Taking advantage of his position, forcing a little girl to follow him is a very rogue thing and despised by people, but he is incompetent as the chairman! On the other hand, he seduced the widow next door and cheated-this is a problem of corruption, others are greedy! So, whether you like it or not, don't be the chairman next to others and lead the whole village to get rich. They are still good chairmen!
If you like this answer, please click "Follow" and discuss any questions together. )
He didn't finish the work alone, and everyone spurned his humanity. He also evaded taxes and broke the law when he was rich. The disgusting dirty circle is too lawless, and a bunch of people are filthy and shameless. This is harmful to people's minds. If the "girl gun" style distorts the masculinity of today's society, then the dirty circle distorts the mainstream values of society and is an accomplice to the prevalence of money worship. Dog meat is delicious, but it doesn't prevent dogs from being animals.
Through his own efforts, director Xiaogang Feng has made great achievements and contributed to the film industry in China. His films are ideological and artistic, and full of philosophy and critical spirit. His film is very good, I want to see it. I also have a positive view of his character-although sometimes swearing is not elegant. I have no reason to scold him anyway. As for Xiao Cui scolding him for personal grudges, it's actually nothing substantial. Moreover, Xiao Cui often swears that the address is unknown and there is not much truth. I can't trust him either.
Yes, the movie is good. But a good movie doesn't mean a good role. Just like Mr. Guo, talents and hooligans are well integrated. In our extreme system, we also live a arrogant life. But the people's eyes are sharp, and the hooligans with perfect packaging can't escape the test of history after all.
Xiaogang Feng's movies are OK. Fanghua is very good, but because I don't know much about the society at that time, it's better to sing * * *. His film is still good, at least it won't be difficult, and it is better than many people. "Assembly" is good. Although the story is like two stories, it is still quite good.