First, don't know about the exam, review at will.
The examination of public institutions is particularly simple in the eyes of many candidates, and it is much less difficult than the national examination and provincial examination. Therefore, many candidates silently picked up the existing national and provincial examination textbooks for review. If they are familiar with it, they will really miss the woodcutter. The examination situation of institutions in each city will be very different. For example, some cities do not take the exam, but only take one subject, and some institutions account for half of the basic knowledge in the test paper. Some institutions will get professional knowledge of some institutions, such as medical positions or teacher positions, and some institutions even take 30% exams and 70% basic knowledge. Do you understand as a candidate? If you don't understand, will you suddenly be caught off guard by blindly reviewing into the examination room? It is suggested that all candidates must fully understand the examination situation before applying for public institutions.
Second, equal treatment regardless of weight.
For most candidates, there are no strategies for answering questions and reviewing. They took the paper and answered from beginning to end. They don't know where to score more, where to score less, where to score easily and where to score hard. All the topics in the paper are treated equally, which is why others can score higher than you in the end. You must pay attention to strategy when answering questions, starting from the topic that is the easiest to score, starting from the topic that you are best at, and starting from the topic that scores higher. Only in this way can you get limited time.
Third, I won't let the test center feel it.
Generally, one-third of the candidates who take the exam take the exam naked, the remaining one-third review by themselves and one-third study in class. Why is the passing rate of studying in class much higher than that of reviewing yourself when the denominator is huge? That's because review is more targeted and can get twice the result with half the effort. Teachers will talk about targeted test sites in the classroom, such as the national and provincial exams that rarely test poetry appreciation, as well as the exams of public institutions. How many students who study by themselves can't catch the test center and review blindly? Isn't this a waste of time and inefficient? You must know every little detail in the exam, know what to take and what not to take, and know to what extent each knowledge point needs to be mastered in order to cope with the exam. Therefore, no matter what kind of review method is adopted, I hope that all candidates will be familiar with each test center in the exam. Only in this way can they have the strength to face the exam!
Fourth, I don't know how to do crazy problems.
Too many candidates choose to study by themselves, read books, and do many questions to review the examinations of public institutions. Then the teacher asked you, have you ever worried that you can't finish the problem in a limited time? So how to solve this problem? The root of the problem is that the method of doing the problem is not fully mastered. Most of the problems are made by stupid methods summarized by themselves, which is of course not acceptable. Only by mastering methods and making full use of skills can we improve the efficiency of doing problems, get ideal scores in a limited time and stand out from the crowd.
Run, candidates, only fully understand the test situation, familiar with each test center, familiar with the methods and skills to do each question. In order to make the examination of public institutions no longer bother you, it is just around the corner!