The defamiliarization of poetic language requires that poetic language must be innovative. However, innovation does not mean doodling. When I first learned to write poetry, my understanding of "the innovation of poetic language" was somewhat biased. I thought whether others can understand it or not, as long as it is an innovative language. Therefore, the language of the poems written is very stiff. Note that blunt language will hurt readers' reading experience, and blunt language will make people flinch!
This problem also exists in my poems. Sometimes when I look at my own work, I can't help falling asleep. Can a work that I can't get into and causes a noise be a good work? The language posts that others can't get into are also extinct language Group. To make the language active and stimulate people's interest in reading, then complete defamiliarization may not work.
Poetry is first of all the art of language, and language is for everyone to read, not to write there as a grave to bury themselves. Therefore, we should make the language of poetry as warm, bright and fragrant as the flowers in the spring wind.
In fact, a really good poem is a very appropriate defamiliarization and innovative art on the basis of everyday language. The language of poetry is like a tree with green leaves, flowers and fruits. Language innovation is based on language inheritance, otherwise it will cause a stiff feeling.
An experienced poet, his poetic language is a bright spider silk. As long as you look at it, it will stick to your eyes, mobilize your life experience and thoughts and emotions, and let you involuntarily enter his preset trap, which is full of sunshine, flowers and mazes, so that you can see what you want to see and find what you didn't expect. It is like a colored rope, which draws the poetry out of your heart and completes a creative reading. In fact, the creativity of poetry is also the participation of readers, not one person can complete it. When you have finished, there is no room for others to create.
Therefore, there is a shortcut to grasp the defamiliarization language, that is, to express the "* * *" hidden in the object with the simplest and most vivid language through the imagination with individuality. From this, I find that the defamiliarization of poetic language is actually the result of the poet's bold imagination and thinking, that is to say, the defamiliarization of poetic language actually comes from the poet's personal and creative imagination and thinking, rather than simply breaking the conventional word arrangement. If the defamiliarization of poetic language is attributed to the change of word arrangement, then poetry will become the waste residue (or language waste residue) of poetry, rather than the gold mine of poetry.
The defamiliarization of poetic language is natural, not forced. It is better to write honestly than to force it. We should innovate the language of poetry, but enough is enough, and don't let it become a word game.
Equality and defamiliarization coexist in a poem. See the strange in the ordinary, set off the strange. Where did Qi come from without Ping? Just like the ups and downs of the earth, there are only flat land, no mountains, only running water and no forests. What is there to see?