2. Poetry should be read across styles. Some people are used to reading only some works with similar tastes and styles, and it is easy to abandon other works or even reject them. This is, of course, the freedom of individual reading choice. But this kind of partial eclipse may cause a certain degree of malnutrition because of reading itself. Reading is one thing, but recognizing, liking and imitating is another. Reading is to understand the general situation of poetry creation and know what classical poets or other poets have written and are writing. You may not approve of a certain style, but you may learn something useful from it, which is not contradictory to your insistence on your own style. On the contrary, it may be more beneficial to read more poems that are quite different or even completely opposite to your own poetic concept and style than to simply read some poems that are similar to your own poetic concept and style. This kind of reading can help us effectively eliminate the concept prejudice and aesthetic interest repetition formed prematurely.
3. Poetry criticism should be compatible with reading. The truly healthy field of poetry criticism is a spiritual contest of all kinds of personalized criticism, which is definitely better than the unprincipled flattery and kindness of the mean. As long as it's not an emotional dispute, as long as it's not a faction's rejection of mountainism, as long as it's not an uncritical idea dispute, we might as well read it. This kind of reading should not have negative presuppositions. Compared with other styles of criticism, poetry criticism is often fierce in rhetoric, and even new poetic prejudice may arise because of the author's stubborn insistence on a certain poetic concept, but as long as it belongs to the scope of discussion, the rest can be ignored. Poetry debate is fundamental, there is no result, there will be no winning or losing, but this is its meaning. Poetry has some basic laws like * * *, but this kind of * * will be less and less, and the monopoly of the so-called poetic principle will gradually fail. In this case, let everyone express their opinions. In our reading, we should not only improve the discrimination and insight of what we read, but also carefully taste the possible truth for our use. Even if you want to discuss the debate, you must first understand the views of the other debater. Your victory lies in compatibility, based on the existence of compatible personality.