Three misunderstandings
First, the language of the article must be? Tall? Put the cart before the horse.
Some candidates think that if you want to get a high score in your composition, you must have a language? Tall? It is wrong to recite advanced theories such as the report of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the government work report and the meeting spirit. We have to think about a question: can we understand these work reports and the spirit of the meeting first? It is obviously wrong to apply some incomprehensible theories to the argumentation of the article, which will only lead to our article being full of empty words and cliches.
On the other hand, the articles we write are argumentative. What is an argumentative essay? The core is to demonstrate clearly what we want to express. Instead of wasting time reciting these? Tall? But? Flashy? Theoretically, it is time-consuming and laborious, so it is better to keep some social hotspots and classic stories, and use them properly in the process of argumentation to assist argumentation, which will not only make the article more? Grounding gas? It can also make the argument more complete.
Second, the structure is too novel, and sesame seeds are lost.
Many candidates are too innovative in the structure of the article and want to catch the examiner's eye quickly, but they don't know that this behavior is just picking up sesame seeds and losing watermelon. What does Shen Lun want to get high marks for? Pleasing two people? One is the proposer. Only by understanding the intention of the proposition can we do the right question and do it well. The other is the auditor. We might as well imagine that the workload of marking papers is very large. Under such intense work, will reviewers still spend time pondering the structure of our article? Not exactly. So what kind of article structure do book reviewers like best? From a practical point of view, the more convenient the better! So what? Rumor has it that. It is not true that the five-paragraph dichotomy (the first paragraph leads to the general argument, the last paragraph sublimates the general argument of kickback, and three sub-arguments are written in the middle) exits the Jianghu. The core of the high score of argumentative writing is whether the general argument of the material can be accurately grasped and clearly demonstrated. On this basis, the novelty of the structure is the icing on the cake, isn't it? Send charcoal in the snow? I hope candidates can grasp the essence and avoid it? Picked up sesame seeds and lost watermelon? .
Third, the more novel the angle of the article, the better, even if it is out of the material.
This is another big misunderstanding of high-scoring composition. It is a crime to think that the writing angle of an article must be novel. Empirical error? . The general argument of the article is equal to? Theme? Besides? Angle? Theme refers to the topic around the core of the material, and the angle is the starting point of article writing. If the topic is off topic, then even if the article is written well, it is the level of three kinds of articles. If it is off-track, it will directly enter the four types of volumes. On the basis of grasping the theme, let's talk about the angle. What is the best angle? Judging from the actual marking results of the public examination application, the novel angle is not necessarily good, and the best angle is the writing angle of the material. If you can understand the material and grasp the writing angle of the material, then the article is basically above 20 points. Grasping the high-frequency words and high-grade words in the material, focusing on the first and last sentences of the material, analyzing the ideas that each material presenter wants to convey in the process of combing the material, and finding out the general argument of the article according to the objective reality of the material through the comprehensive application of the above methods is the core factor for applying for high-grade composition.
Five principles
First, the principle of ensuring time. The time requirement for reading is 40 minutes. This is limited by the following factors: 1 Professionalism of material content. 2. The richness of material content. 3. Disorder of material form.
Second, grasp the principle of integrity. In the process of reading the material, we must grasp the principle of integrity, grasp the theme and level of the given material, form a three-dimensional impression in our minds, and break it into parts, so that the answer will be targeted and timely. Otherwise, you can only answer irrelevant questions and deviate from the subject.
Three. The materials given by emphasizing the key principles involve a lot of contents, but the key point is how to build an environment-friendly society and how to adhere to the coordination and unity of protection and development. The principle of emphasizing key points refers to both the whole given information and each given paragraph. Only by taking care of all the information can we embody the principle of emphasizing the key points.
Fourth, the filtering principle. Some paragraphs in a given material have nothing to do with the theme of the material, or are mostly paving materials, or there are too many descriptive languages in the given material. Candidates must learn to screen and filter materials.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) emphasizes the universal principle. Reading comprehension materials must highlight the universal principle according to the overall impression, that is, the understanding of ordinary people and the popular way of thinking. Emphasizing the universal principle means that candidates should not deviate from the basic tendency and tone provided by the materials, otherwise they will be far from the reference answers provided and their scores will not be satisfactory.
Six requirements
First, study the laws of materials.
The given materials applied for are a unified whole, and no materials are separated from this whole. Therefore, when answering the application, we should first read it carefully, grasp the core idea and overall context of the material, grasp its laws, and not be divorced from the material. The given materials are the basis of answering the application examination and run through the whole process of answering the application.
Summarize the question-all the answers come from the material;
Countermeasures-the feasibility and pertinence of the proposed countermeasures are also related to the materials;
Comprehensive analysis questions-the remarks or phenomena mentioned have been included in the materials;
Discussion and writing topics-arguments and fundamental countermeasures are also derived from materials, and argumentation is also to make full use of materials to demonstrate.
If you don't digest these scattered and disorderly materials into the content you need to apply for the exam, even if you have the ability to write and express, it is difficult to achieve the ideal effect. So we must do a good job of reprocessing and upgrading.
Second, cross routines and templates
It is helpful for candidates to learn the routines or templates just now, and it is also a good way to save review time through preliminary research. But without their own digestion, their own thinking, their own feelings, their own views, the so-called high-scoring model is mechanically copied, without innovation and disharmony, so the article will appear empty and dull. Therefore, it affects the structure and fullness of the article, and the marking teacher will feel boring, so it is probably whimsical to get high marks in your article. So the process of crossing this routine and template can be close to success.
Third, put forward the argument from an accurate angle.
Title requirements and given materials are two sources of arguments, perhaps a central argument and several sub-arguments. Argumentation is the window of the whole article. According to the content requirements, it is very important to grasp the key words and clearly put forward the argument. The core of the argument is the formulation of the topic, the choice of structure and the content of discussion. Therefore, whether the argument can be put forward accurately and sharply directly affects the intention of the composition and the success or failure of the composition. A good beginning is half the battle. After the marking teacher gets the answer sheet, he will search your argument first. If the argument is vague or the angle is uncertain, the article will be scored in three or four categories. Some candidates have no wrong understanding of the problem, but the methods of putting forward arguments from different angles are not ideal, which leads to uncontrollable. They always come in and out in twists and turns, the whole expression process is not smooth and clear enough, and they always wander on the edge of digression or digression.
Fourth, the level is clear and the logic is clear.
Some candidates can't effectively grasp the overall thinking and layout, lack the ability to summarize, and can't tell the priorities of the analysis materials, and even can't tell the appearances and roots. They are trapped in scattered data and can't pull out a clear logical structure. Therefore, it is not systematic, the level is unclear, and the logic is chaotic. In fact, this phenomenon is generally due to the lack of enough ability and time to grasp and sort out the overall thinking, as well as psychological failure in advance caused by confusion and confusion. Therefore, I suggest that candidates must overcome this difficulty before the exam, and it is necessary to exercise and improve their ability to control materials.
Five, the language is fluent, step by step.
The ability to express words is one of the abilities to apply for the exam. The syllabus clearly requires candidates to skillfully use means such as explanation, statement and discussion to express their ideas accurately, normatively, concisely and freely. Shen Lun's writing style is different from ordinary writing style. Can't be as subjective and emotional as writing prose poems. Instead, we must ask the language to be concise, standardized and rigorous, to tell the truth and make a long story short, but we can also pursue moderate vividness, so we should avoid being dull and straightforward and increase persuasion and appeal.
Six, the structure is complete, with a certain height, width, depth and strength.
The basic thinking mode of applied writing-? What is this? Why? What shall we do? Then what? Argument, argument, argument? In establishing the structure of the article, but this only solves the establishment of the basic framework. The content of writing needs to be filled in the following four dimensions in order to achieve a standard combination of flesh and blood.
Height-focus on long-term interests, see the essence through phenomena, and be good at sublimating the theme.
Depth-pay attention to the depth of thought, and the analysis and understanding of problems should not be too superficial, especially the analysis of reasons.
Broad-minded-broad vision when writing, good at using sporadic thinking, subjective and objective, internal and external factors, past, present and future?
Strength-there are practical and effective countermeasures to solve problems, which are feasible and targeted.
Three skills
First, clarify the nature of application testing. Application testing is different from traditional material composition testing. It is an examination that pays equal attention to the analysis, control and expression of materials. This sentence emphasizes that the application test is different from the traditional material composition, and the majority of candidates must realize that they cannot use the writing thinking of traditional material composition to deal with the application test. Traditional materials mainly include fables, cartoons, comparisons, comments and associations. Composition focuses on the meaning of the material, not just the material itself, and requires independent conception and self-made title according to the content and meaning of the material.
Secondly, it is obvious that the time spent reading materials is different from the time spent writing other given materials. The writing of the application clearly requires that the reading time is 40 minutes and the answering time is 1 10 minutes.
Third, the order of answering questions is clear. Because the test paper and the answer sheet are separated, the answer requirements can only be written on the answer sheet, and the test paper is electronically scanned. This requires candidates to answer questions in turn, not in reverse order, and the answers are written in the designated position. If you don't answer the questions in order, the answer position will be wrong, which will lead to abnormal test papers and will inevitably affect your grades.