While turning at an intersection, my bicycle crushed a stranger’s right ankle. I could have safely dodged. When I saw the gentleman holding a little boy who was just about to walk in one hand and a staggering elderly stroke patient in the other, I immediately stopped the car and turned the front of the car to one side. At this moment, he suddenly suddenly Taking a short step forward, he bumped into him. I quickly jumped out of the car and said uneasily: "I'm sorry! I'm sorry!" He bent down to massage his ankles and raised his head kindly: "I don't blame you, I bumped into it myself... maybe I was too worried. , I thought that if the car wouldn’t hit my child, it would hit my father, so I subconsciously stepped forward to stop him.” When I was in shock and confused, the gentleman was already holding the child and the old man. Slowly leaving, I watched them blankly. The three slow-footed figures formed a touching picture. I had the urge to put down the car to help the gentleman, but I never did. I found that the children and the old man were like two burdens on the gentleman's shoulders. No matter how hard it was, he would not let go of either side. "Three Generations" and "Walking" have similar themes but also differences, but the plot differences are minor. This question is for comparative reading to cultivate appreciation skills. Reading is a personalized behavior, and the emotion of "moving" is even more personalized. It's okay to say "Walking" is more touching; it's okay to say "Three Generations" is more touching, as long as it makes sense. Teachers should guide students to correctly grasp the main themes of the two short articles. "Three Generations" says that one would rather be injured than to protect the old and the young; "Walking" says that filial piety comes first. When measuring works, we must also consider their social value.