What are the two main qualities of john keats as a poet?

Keats has only two main qualities as a poet? Tell me the news. I mean, you have his personal characteristics-reciting some Keats' works, and you will appreciate some of the most wonderful English poems-and you also have his self-conscious poems, which he and his contemporaries also have in the romantic world. These people bring nature into their lives and consciousness; They are also emotional people, who regard emotionalization as part of their way of thinking about the world.

There are many different ways to look at Keats, far more than two. Some people, such as Eliot, promoted him to a romantic without personal feelings and saw a fellow traveler in Keats' "negative ability" (thinking that creativity can be driven by the unknown ability of the mind to understand things). Others regard Keats as a skeptic, and so on. I think doctors have written and will write many different theories about Keats' poems.

I came across a short story Keats and His Poems written by Maurice dickstein (University of Chicago, 197 1). Since then, I have been using this book to better understand Keats' way of looking at and understanding the world. Its central idea is to regard romanticism as:

The real dividing line in romantic poetry is not between reality and ideal, but between self-awareness and imagination, between nudity (in Ye Zhi's view) and myth, and between the pain of existence and the self-transcendence of imagination. For romantics, the real realistic poetry is not naturalism and "process" poetry, but personal exploration or crisis poetry, self-confrontation poetry.

Ode to a Nightingale is so important not only to Keats, but also to all romantic literature, because it dramatizes these opposing melodies, because it depicts a circuitous and clear road to realize the self-definition and self-understanding of tragedy through fantasy and naturalistic desire.

According to my understanding of dickstein's premise, Keats' world outlook has experienced a gradual process. In the early days, he saw the combination beyond nature, which made him excited and filled him with the tendency of romantic writers to discover everything in nature. But then he rolled his eyes and took the inevitable death as a part of our lives. Our life is a double witness of terror and ecstasy, ego and everything, ideal and myth, ego and reality (in the words of Ben Barrett).

To me, Ode to Melancholy is Keats' last words. He turned death into a tragic joy, a escher-style world, and the two were integrated. Nightingale's "peaceful death" is tragic and true now, but for the poet and Keats, he knows and is willing to see all this, without any futile attempt and pure myth. This is a very brave thing for any [1].