When the Manchu invaded China, I'm afraid people would ask, "Was the Qing Dynasty the dynasty of China? Don't! A few people answered, yes! Absolutely! Immediately, countless people opposed it. Why? Say yes, China people think:
Manchu speaks Chinese, so Manchu is the dynasty of China. In fact, Manchu was established as the national language in Qing Dynasty, that is, Manchu was the official language of Qing Dynasty. A considerable number of official documents from the early leaves to the middle of 19 were written in Manchu (clear characters). For example, the official treaty of the Nebuchadnezzar Chu Treaty is only in Manchu, Russian and Latin, while the Chinese version of China is only used for engraving boundary markers (the inscription * * is in Manchu and Mongolian), and they were written together only from the19th century.
Even Ewenki (Ewenki), Nanai (Hezhe), Negdar, Auroch, Auroch, Udeh (Udege) and Urqi are still spoken by Manchu in Mongolia and the Russian Federation. It is self-deception to say that Manchu was assimilated by China. On the contrary, China's national language (Putonghua) was forcibly popularized by the Qing Dynasty, and real Chinese has no "er" sound. Zhang Taiyan once criticized Putonghua and called it "Golden Tatar".
Moreover, there is no rule to divide countries by language in this world. Many African countries speak English, but are they the same country as Britain? Both China and Singapore speak Chinese, but is Singapore a part of China? Arab countries all speak Arabic, but are they one country? However, some people in China said: "The Manchu people were finally assimilated by us in China, so the Qing Dynasty was our dynasty." It is really the spirit of Ah Q. Japan, China and South Korea are all Confucian countries, but can we say that China, Japan and South Korea are one country? Can you say that War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression is a civil war in China? France and Germany are both Christian civilizations, but are they one country? Typical confusion of thinking
But China people still think that the Qing Dynasty was the dynasty of China, and they will say, "Today's Manchu is a citizen of China, so the Manchu at that time should also be counted as a China." This logic is equivalent to saying, "Today, black Americans are Americans, so their ancestors were all Americans for eighteen generations." Besides, is Manchu only available in China? No, the Manchus used to be Tungusic people living in Siberia, and now there are Manchu people living there. Manchu, Russia, North Korea and Manchu are also their ethnic minorities. Now Beiman is still in Russia. According to China's logic, both Russians and Koreans can say, "We once conquered China and ruled China for 300 years." ?
Moreover, according to international practice, judging the nationality of the deceased is based on the nationality before death, not on which country the birthplace belongs after death. Li Bai, a poet of the Tang Dynasty, was born in Yu Ye, which is now Kyrgyzstan. According to them, Li Bai should not belong to China people. But Li Bai is still from China. Why? Because he came from China when he was alive.
Sun Yat-sen said in the Second Lecture on Nationalism:
"For thousands of years, China has been politically oppressed and even completely conquered. There have been two times, once in the Yuan Dynasty and once in the Qing Dynasty. "
The Qing Dynasty was just a colonial regime established by Tunguska people on the land of China. We should understand a concept: The Qing Dynasty was the history of China people being enslaved by foreigners, not the orthodox dynasty of China. Now people in China call the Qing Dynasty China orthodox, but they don't know that the rulers of the Qing Dynasty themselves don't consider themselves China people. Otherwise, why did Ci Xi say, "I would rather be a friend than a slave (from China)" and "I am the king of a foreign country and am in charge of China's affairs"? Sun's argument of "expelling Tatars and restoring China" is the same as Gu's argument of national subjugation and world extinction.
The Mongolian Empire swept across Eurasia, and the Yuan Dynasty was just one of the colonies of the Mongolian Empire.
It is even more absurd to say that the Yuan Dynasty was the dynasty of China. Mongolia was not Manchu originally, but its history is world-class and known all over the world, and it is not as easy to compile as Manchu history.
At the end of the Song Dynasty, wars broke out in various places, and the influence of the Mongolian Golden Account Khanate in the north continued to expand, reaching the Pacific Ocean in the east, the Danube River in the west, the South China Sea in China in the south and Siberia in the north. The Chinese nation also perished under the iron hoof of the Mongols, and our people were unable to resist the powerful invader Mongolia and became the conquered.
Some people say: "China has Mongolia, so the history of Mongolia is the history of China." Ha ha. . . Mongolians have traveled all over Eurasia, and many countries have Mongolian descendants. Mongolians, Russians, Ukrainians, Finns, Iranians, Turks, Hungarians, Indians and many other countries, not just China. If China wants to brag about the Mongol Empire, Ukrainians and even Hungarians can say so. There are Russians, Kazakhs and Koreans in China. How do you explain this? Are Russian, Kazakh and Korean histories all part of China's history? Similarly, the Han nationality (китай) is also one of the ethnic minorities in Russia. According to Russian logic, isn't our history a part of Russian history? Our historical figures such as Yue Fei, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty and Qin Shihuang are all Russian nationals? The absurdity can be imagined.
Some people say: "Inner Mongolia is a part of China, so the history of Mongolia is the history of China." I can only say that this statement is ignorant. The Russian Federation has the Republics of Buryatia, kalmyk and Tuva, all of which were founded by Mongols. China has only one Mongolian autonomous region, and the Russian Federation has three Mongolian republics. Are Russians more qualified to say this than we are?
Many people often say: "China is a multi-ethnic country, and 56 ethnic groups are all from China, not just the Han nationality." I want to prove that the Mongolian Empire and the Great Qing Dynasty are not only the pride of Mongols and Manchus, but also the pride of the whole "Chinese nation". So how many countries in the world are not multi-ethnic countries? There are more than 65,438+070 nationalities in Russia. When Russia was ruled by Mongolia, did Mongolia conquer China, which was regarded as the glory of Russians? Does it count as Russian rule over China?
If we follow the logic of these people, I would like to ask, why do China people always refer to the occupation of the territory of the Qing Empire by Russia as "aggression"? Russians are one of the 56 members of today's "Chinese nation" (which once belonged to the Mongolian Empire in history) and should be completely equal to Manchu. Then the territorial disputes and wars between Russia and the Qing Empire should be internal contradictions and civil wars of the "Chinese nation". Then why is Russia an aggressor? Are Russians inferior to Manchu and Mongolian? Isn't this contradictory to the "big family of the Chinese nation"? Also, since Russians are also from China, Russian heroes such as Ivan the Great and Peter the Great should also be national heroes of China. This can be extended to the feud between Mongols and Russians in history, which is also an internal affair of China. Of course, it is easy to infer that China has an obligation to recover Russia. . . . As for the so-called "Chinese nation", it is just a political vocabulary. In fact, there is no such nation. The United States has almost all the nationalities in the world. If a "Chinese nation" can be established, then all ethnic groups in the United States should be collectively called "American nation". Therefore, the history of all nationalities in the world is American history. . . . Don't laugh, this is the official historical logic of China now.
Having said that, I believe some people will not give up. Some even say, "Mongolia is independent from China, so the history of Mongolia is the history of China." So now many people are clamoring for "recovering Mongolia". But in fact, there is no claim that Mongolia belongs to the territory of China in history. On the contrary, it was Mongolians who ruled China in 163 and experienced fifteen emperors. It should be what they said, "China has belonged to Mongolia since ancient times". The year 2006 marks the 800th anniversary of the founding of Mongolia, which ruled China 100 for many years. Historically, there was a country in the north of China. You should remember the story of Zhao Jun's leaving the fortress and Su Wu herding sheep. Obviously, China has never occupied the present Mongolian area, but Mongolia has completely conquered China 100 years. During the Ming Dynasty, the two countries were still at war, and Ming Yingzong was captured by the Mongols. In the Qing Dynasty, Manchu ruled China, Manchu nobles intermarried with each other, and half of the Manchu royal family was Mongolian. At that time, there was no China, so even in the Qing Dynasty, it was not China who ruled Mongolia, but Mongolia who ruled China. After entering the Republic of China, Xu Shuzheng, a northern warlord, occupied Kulun (the old name of Ulaanbaatar) for a short time, but was soon expelled, and Mongolia also took the opportunity to recover some lost land (in the view of the National Government). In the year of the end of World War II, the Mongolian army entered Zhangjiakou and pushed Beijing. Therefore, although Mongolia has been weak for hundreds of years, China is also at a disadvantage. Therefore, it is far-fetched and imperialist to say that Mongolia is the territory of the Republic of China, even from the perspective of China. According to China's logic, China became independent from Mongolia in the early Ming Dynasty, so China and even Eurasia have been an inalienable territory of Mongolia since ancient times and should be returned to Mongolia. . .
Genghis Khan established the world-famous Great Mongolian Empire. At that time, China was just one of countless countries that perished in the hands of Mongols, just a colony, that's all. The relationship between Mongolian Empire and China is just like the relationship between British Empire and India, the relationship between Genghis Khan and China people, and the relationship between Queen Victoria and India. The British Empire once occupied India, and India became its colony. China people described the Mongol Empire as a dynasty in China and Genghis Khan as a native of China. This behavior is as absurd as the Indian saying that the British Empire is a dynasty in India and Queen Victoria is an Indian. . . According to this logic, it should be said that Genghis Khan is Russian in Russia (the Golden Horde), where the four great empires of Mongolia are located? Iran (ilhan) wants to say that Genghis Khan is Iranian? Central Asian countries (Chagatai khanate) want to say that Genghis Khan belongs to their country? If Kublai Khan is from China, Badou is Russian and Xuliewu is Persian. Genghis Khan didn't know which nationality he was. Do you think these ideas are ridiculous? Why is it right to use it on yourself? Ha ha. .
Lu Xun said in Rummaging: "When I was young, I knew that after Pangu opened heaven and earth, there were three emperors and five emperors in China ... Song Dynasty, Yuan Dynasty, Ming Dynasty,' I was in Qing Dynasty'. At the age of twenty, I heard that Genghis Khan conquered Europe, which was the most luxurious time for' us'. It was not until I was twenty-five years old that I realized that the so-called "we" were the richest times. In fact, the Mongols conquered China and we became slaves. It was not until August this year (reference1934-cited) that I turned over three Mongolian history books because I wanted to check a short story. Only then did I understand that the Mongols conquered Volos, invaded Hungary and Austria, and then conquered all China. At that time, Genghis Khan was not our sweat, and Russians were more qualified to be slaves than we were. They should say' Our Genghis Khan conquered China'. "If China people want to say that Genghis Khan is' our pride', then Russians are more qualified to say this sentence than you, because they became Mongolian slaves earlier and longer than China people.
Mongolia and Russia are the successors of the Mongolian Empire, but China is not.
1. According to China's official logic-look at history from today's perspective.
Then the Siberian prairie, the birthplace of the Mongols, is now located in the Russian Federation.
2. Mongolia ruled Russia for 250 years, and after more than 400 years, it lived in large numbers with Russians. European countries still call Russians "descendants of Genghis Khan". There is a saying in Europe that "catch a Russian and find a Tatar." It shows that there is actually a Tatar (Mongolian) hidden inside. The tenacious and martial folk customs of Russians are deeply influenced by Mongolia.
3. Mongolia's influence on Russian far exceeds that on China. Mongolian Tatar nobles of Kazan Khan, Astra Khan, Siberian Khan, Crimean Khan and Nogai Khan later worked in the Russian Principality and became the source of surnames of many archduke, kings and nobles. The Tsar family is of Mongolian descent, and yelena, the mother of Ivan the Great, is a direct descendant of Genghis Khan. Peter the Great's face has obvious Mongolian characteristics. Lenin is a quarter of Mongolian descent in kalmyk. Mongolian Tatars not only passed on the form of blood to the Russians, but also passed on the political system, tax system, customs system and military system to the Russians. Mongols contributed two czars Boris and Faidel Godunov to Russia. Six queens: Solomon Sabrau; Yelena Gliska Eva; Irina Godunova; Natalia naresh Jinna; Marfa Aplak Hina; Yev Dochia Saburowa. Mongolian Tatars also passed on the post station and military strategy and tactics to the Russians. For example, famous generals Yuri Mesh Cerschi Khan, Andrei Cerchi Zoff, Elmorov, Doherty Tulov, Mayushkin, Mordvinov, Epanchin, Bilyev, Zhilinski, Scelba Chev and other scientific giants such as Mendeleev, Mechnikov, Pavlov, Dimitritsev, historians Kandemir, karamzin and polar scientists Cheryushin and Chirikov all have Mongolia. Russian proverb says that if you study Russians deeply, there will be Tatars (Mongols). De Maister also said, "To catch a Russian is to catch a Tatar." The influence of Mongolian Tatars on the Russian nation is so far-reaching that it has formed the view that Russians are westerners in the west and westerners in the east. In addition, Mongolian Tatars left a deep impression on the culture and art of the Russian nation. Dostoevsky and Turgenev, the three greatest novelists in the history of Russian literature, are of Mongolian descent, and only Turgenev of Mongolian descent can write novels with unparalleled profound understanding and experience of grasslands. Dancers include ulanova; Anna pavlova is a descendant of Mongolian Tatars. -Excerpt from History of Nomadic Civilization
Restore the historical truth
Genghis Khan and Nurhachi are not from China, but they are related to the people of China, because they and their descendants, although Gong did it, killed and insulted our ancestors, but their blood still flows on us. The Mongolian Empire's genocide in China is unprecedented. As a world record, the number of victims was recorded in the Guinness Book of World Records 1985 edition. Throughout the history of China, it is a humiliating history. It is a fact to admit that you are from China, but it is also a humiliation. However, in order to escape such humiliation, it is even more shameful to recognize Mongols and Manchu as ancestors. If the Japanese failed in the Anti-Japanese War and established a "harmonious dynasty" in China, and some Japanese (harmony) merged into the "Chinese nation", shouldn't we call Hirohito the emperor of China? Hideki Tojo is a great hero to unify the Chinese nation? The war of aggression against China is a civil war of the Chinese nation? Marxist materialist philosophy tells us that consciousness can correctly reflect things. That is to say, although human consciousness is wrong in some periods, in the end, the truth will be realized by human beings, and China people will finally realize the facts of the invaders in Yuan and Qing Dynasties, so that history can return to objectivity.