Master's Wisdom or Mystery —— Wu Qingyuan's "2 1 Century Go"?

There are many stories about Wu, but most of them are written by reporters. You add bricks and tiles, I add bricks and tiles, wonderful, just like blowing an ordinary military commander Guan Yu into a warrior. The score says the new layout, that everyone imitated it all at once, and the layout is everywhere. Actually, what about this? Look at the mini China now. Everyone follows. Moreover, these layouts are feasible and can stand the test of actual combat, instead of being completely unnecessary like the new layout, including Wu himself. In addition, the avalanche turned inward, saying that it was "a broken rock, which onlookers thought was the wrong formula." In fact, if you think about it carefully, isn't it "shocking" and "I thought I remembered the formula wrong" when someone gave it to a novice? There are many similar novices, which is worth touting? I don't understand. There is no denying that Wu won some chess and dominated for a while. However, it is normal that chess will have a overlord every ten years. Xiu Ce is the first great man in the eyes of the Japanese. Why did he become Lao Wu when he arrived in China? Still don't get it. To say that the game is cruel, the ancient Japanese chess game is not worse than Wu's ten-piece chess, but we always brag about the pressure of ten-piece chess, which is really too much. As for some people who like to say, "Have you ever played Wu's chess? I called XX times, and I admire XXXX from the bottom of my heart. . . "It's all bullshit. Chess is not as good as amateur four paragraphs. Let's see what it is. Most of them are influenced by the boasting of chess reviews. On the contrary, the professional chess player's response to Wu is mediocre. Paul Yu Pin, Liu and others all said on different occasions that Wu's chess is not as good as today's chess, and he affirmed that Go is progressive. Although he likes playing chess with Wu, he says in his book that Wu is "not very strong". Of course, they were beaten up by some chess fans: typical online speech violence, Cultural Revolution style, no room for contradictory speech, no conclusive arguments, only self-expression, no imperative sentences of truth. Turn a circle, back to the ancient and modern contrast. Some people like to compare piano, calligraphy and other arts, which shows that there is no difference between ancient and modern Go, and Fan Shiwu is better than Li Qiang. In fact, everything has its own law of development. It is true that there is little difference between ancient and modern piano skills, but many things, such as weapons and technology, are changing with each passing day. So don't make random analogies, tell the truth. The ancients like to admit that Fan Shi is strong enough to defeat Li Changgao; He also said that Wu was tall enough to spare Li Changgao. But they never compare it with Wu. Why? Afraid of contradiction or never thought about it. Compared with Li, Wu is an ancient man, so he blows the ancients and blows Li. So is Fan Shi. However, compared with Fan Shibi, Wu is a modern man, and all ancient remarks are directed at Wu. That is beside the point. Imagine if Chang Hao dug up Song Taikang in Wu's chess book and was resurrected. How would everyone flatter him? Although unimaginable, it is at least one of the masters of ancient and modern times. Wu layout is good: the realm is high. The layout is broken: try a novice. Just play in the middle: superb technology. There is a leak in the back and the disk surface is thin: close it when it is ready. Wu did a wonderful job: (unimaginable compliment, beyond words). The opponent played a clever game: someone made a move. . . In short, I still hope that everyone will look at Wu's chess objectively and not be too influenced by words. In the history of Weiqi for hundreds of years, Wu was the overlord of a specific period. It is not easy to raise or lower. As for the army, nationality and patriotism, it is beyond the scope of this article. Even if Wu is identified as a traitor and traitor, it can't change the objective fact that he is "the overlord in a specific period in the history of Weiqi for hundreds of years". It's like playing football. "Playing with women at the peak" can't affect the pure technical conclusion of "fast peak speed".