In the informal talks, the representative of the United States mentioned open relations. Is this relationship really free?

In "Informal Talks", we talked about the open relationship, which is actually a kind of relationship in which both parties keep frank in marriage, and either party can have intimate relationship with a third party with the other party's knowledge. On this issue, the representative of the United States thinks he can accept it because? Love is freedom? . Yes, love is free, but Chen Ming believes that although love is free, it will still be carried out in a universal moral and ethical way. In fact, some people have experienced this kind of open relationship, but the husband and wife are unhappy and the happiness index is not high.

In fact, when talking about this issue, the representative of the United States said that he had plans to get married. In the first five years, it can be said that they should live well, but in the second five years, or the sixth year, they may have a sense of boredom. So if there is an open relationship at this time, it is actually acceptable to him, because compared with other countries, the United States is indeed a very open country, but this relationship. Because marriage is a free relationship that is bound by law.

If you really want to be free, there is no need to get married, because marriage itself is a constraint for everyone, so if you want to be free, there is no need to get married. In this case, you can have the right of freedom on the basis of boyfriend and girlfriend, because you can change people indefinitely without being bound by law. This is absolute freedom. Once you step into the marriage hall, you are actually accepting bondage. In this case, your freedom is. Monogamy? .

Therefore, an open relationship is actually an unreliable relationship. In short, when you are bound, you have to choose freedom. This situation is actually unnecessary. As long as you don't get married, you will always be free.