If you want to convict a person and bind some abstract concepts with the criminals, you'd better find the internal connection first. For example, if you want to say that Qing Wu desecrated art, poetry and beauty, you must first find a chain. This chain can be like this: 1 Your wife likes reading poetry →2 Qing Wu likes writing poetry →3 Your wife reads Qing Wu's sentence: My tachycardia is enough for you to reach orgasm. Tell me the address. Now let's talk about Qing Wu and his poems. First of all, I throw out my personal judgment. I think Qing Wu can write poetry, and he writes it quite well. After reading the answers here, most people don't know much about poetry. That classmate Jiang upstairs is not sure either. She's just kind. In fact, all kinds of literary forms are essentially combinations of words. About modern poetry, we have an impression that modern poetry is a combination of vernacular Chinese, which is true. In my opinion, it is very difficult to write poems in vernacular Chinese, which is much more difficult than writing metrical poems in classical Chinese. Ancient poetry has ready-made gameplay and the experience of predecessors. You write casually according to the rules. When people look at them, they think they are poems, because their thinking is frozen, and they think anything that looks like this is poetry. In my opinion, writing poems in vernacular Chinese itself broke through a kind of shackles, which the ancients failed to do. This should be something to be proud of. However, the status of modern poetry in modern people's minds is regrettable.
?