The civil judge of Guangxi High Court tried again to falsify the law, and the evidence was conclusive, so he was ruling on the Internet.

firstly, if the parties are not satisfied with the court's decision, they can apply for a retrial. According to Article 199 of the Civil Procedure Law, if a party thinks there is an error in a legally effective judgment or ruling, he may apply to the people's court at the next higher level for retrial; A case in which one party is large or both parties are citizens may also apply to the people's court that originally tried the case for retrial. If a party applies for a retrial, the execution of the judgment or ruling shall not be stopped.

Article 2 If the application of a party meets any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall retry the case:

(1) There is new evidence sufficient to overturn the original judgment or ruling;

(2) the basic facts identified in the original judgment or ruling are not proved by evidence;

(3) The main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling is forged;

(4) the main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling has not been cross-examined;

(5) The parties concerned cannot collect the main evidence needed for the trial of the case by themselves due to objective reasons, and apply in writing to the people's court for investigation and collection, but the people's court fails to collect it;

(6) The original judgment or written order is indeed wrong in applying the law;

(7) the composition of the judicial organization is illegal or the judges who should be avoided according to law have not avoided;

(8) A person without legal capacity has not represented him or the party who should participate in the litigation has not participated in the litigation due to reasons that cannot be attributed to him or his agent ad litem;

(9) depriving the parties of the right to debate in violation of the law;

(1) The judgment is made by default without a summons;

(11) The original judgment or ruling is omitted or exceeds the claim;

(12) The legal document on which the original judgment or ruling was made has been revoked or changed;

(13) The judge has committed acts of corruption, bribery, favoritism, and perverting the law when trying the case.

article 21 if the parties provide evidence to prove that the mediation violates the principle of voluntariness or the contents of the mediation agreement violate the law, they may apply for a retrial. If it is verified by the people's court, it shall be retried.

At the same time, the effective judgment announced by the court is stipulated by law and complies with relevant laws. According to Article 8 of the Provisions of the People's Court on People's Courts Publishing Judgment Documents on the Internet, the judge in charge or the specialized personnel designated by the People's Court shall complete the technical treatment in accordance with the requirements of Articles 6 and 7 of these Provisions within seven days after the judgment documents come into effect, and submit them to the specialized institution of our hospital responsible for publishing judgment documents on the Internet for publication on China Judgment Documents Network.

article 9 if a single judge or collegial panel thinks that the judgment document is inappropriate to be published on the internet in item 4 of article 4 of these provisions, it shall put forward written opinions and reasons, which shall be reviewed by the department head and reported to the competent vice president for examination and approval.

article 1 the judgment documents published on the internet shall be consistent with the judgment documents served on the parties, except for the technical treatment in accordance with the requirements of these provisions.

if the people's court makes corrections to the judgment documents served on the parties, it shall promptly publish the corrected ruling on the internet.