Did the robots in Interstellar violate the laws of robotics?

Generally speaking, the law of robots is a technical background constructed by Asimov in several of his novels. Other sci-fi works and sci-fi systems, if not clearly stated, are generally not considered to have adopted a similar technical background. There is no evidence that robots in Interstellar have a "robot law" similar to the Asimov system, so it is impossible to violate it or not. Then Lengda declared to continue. In fact, precision guided missiles are robots that specialize in killing people. Asimov's system is just a good wish. Asimov's robot, I think, in a sense, should be a mechanical creature, not a mechanical creation. What artificial intelligence can be born with self-awareness, but can't naturally calculate addition, subtraction, multiplication and division? Up to now, the artificially designed computer has been very fast, but it still can't do such small things as face recognition and some character recognition well. Electronic brain is indeed made by people, but human beings can't interfere with and control the growth and development of consciousness inside, which is obviously the feeling that there are creatures growing inside ... so this setting is rarely used in later science fiction. In fact, the three laws of robots are not a "law" at all, but three "laws" conceived by Asimov. The zeroth law of robots must not sit idly by and watch the harm to human beings as a whole. In this film, the robot takes saving the whole human race as its top priority, so it actively shuts down the automatic docking system. However, this article is also quite deceptive, especially when there is a collective conflict between two human beings. If it has to be set, it may decide to turn off automatic docking after complicated calculations, making the whole human being more likely to be rescued. I personally agree that the law of robots is not a universal value system. Otherwise, blade runner, including the Terminator mentioned above, would have destroyed itself.