Study the patterns of materials. The given material for the argument is a unified whole, and no piece of material is separated from this whole. Therefore, when answering an essay, you must first read carefully to grasp the core idea and overall context of the material, and you must master its laws and cannot be divorced from the material. The given materials are the basis for answering the essay examination and run through the whole process of answering the essay.
Summary induction questions---the answers all come from the materials;
Countermeasure questions---the feasibility and pertinence of the proposed countermeasures are also based on the materials;
Comprehensive analysis questions---the remarks or phenomena mentioned are already included in the materials;
Discussion writing questions---the arguments and basic countermeasures are also derived from the materials, and argumentation is also required. Make full use of materials to demonstrate your argument.
If you do not digest and process the scattered and disordered materials into the content required for the essay examination, even if you have the ability to express yourself as a writer, it will be difficult to achieve the desired results. So we need to do a good job of reprocessing and upgrading.
Across routines and templates. Candidates who have just learned routines or templates will be helpful to cultivate their essay thinking. It is also a good way to save review time through previous research. However, without your own later digestion, without your own thinking, insights and opinions, you will just copy the so-called high-scoring models without new ideas and harmony, so the article will appear empty and dull. Therefore, it will affect the structure and fullness of the article, and the marking teacher will also find it boring, so it may be unreasonable for your article to get high marks. So we can get closer to success by overcoming this routine and template process.
Put forward arguments from an accurate perspective. The question requirements and the given materials are the two sources of argument, perhaps a central argument and several sub-arguments. The argument is the window of the entire article. It is important to grasp the key words and present the argument from a clear perspective according to the content requirements. The formulation of the title, the choice of structure, and the content of the discussion are all centered on the argument. Therefore, whether the argument can be accurately and sharply presented directly affects the purpose of the composition, and thus is directly related to the success or failure of the composition. A good start is half the battle. After getting the answer sheet, the marking teacher will first search for the argument you raised. If the argument is vague or the angle is not grasped accurately, the article will be classified as a third or fourth category article. Some candidates' understanding of the problem is not wrong, but the method of presenting arguments from different angles is not ideal, which makes them unable to control it later. They always go in and out, beat around the bush, the whole expression process is not smooth and clear enough, and they always wander on the edge of going off topic or digressing from the topic.
Clear levels and clear logic. Some candidates are unable to effectively grasp the overall thinking, plan the layout of the article, lack the ability to summarize, cannot distinguish the priority, importance and urgency when analyzing the materials, and even cannot distinguish the symptoms from the root causes. They are stuck in scattered materials and cannot draw out clarity. logical structure. Therefore, the countermeasures proposed are also unsystematic, unclear in level, one by one, and the logic is confusing. In fact, this phenomenon is generally caused by confusion and confusion caused by insufficient ability and time to grasp and organize the overall thinking, and is caused by psychological failure. Therefore, I suggest that candidates need to overcome this difficulty before taking the exam. It is necessary to exercise and improve their ability to control materials.
The language is fluent and the words are on point. Written expression ability is one of the abilities tested in thesis application. The syllabus clearly requires candidates to be proficient in using explanations, statements, discussions, etc. to express their ideas accurately, standardly, concisely and smoothly. Argument writing is different from ordinary writing. It cannot be as subjective and emotionally rich as writing prose and poetry. Instead, the language must be simple, standardized, and rigorous, and the truth must be told and the story short. However, moderate vividness can also be pursued. Therefore, it is necessary to avoid being plain and straightforward and increase persuasiveness and appeal.
On this basis, it is important to grasp key information points based on objective requirements. Some candidates fail to get to the point in what they say, and they only scratch the surface but fail to grasp the key points. They talk too much and then turn into a pot of porridge. Therefore, you should learn to use concise and accurate expressions. If some content is not explained clearly, it is advisable to find a suitable example to supplement it.
The structure is complete and has a certain height, width, depth and strength. The basic way of thinking in essay writing---"What? Why? How to do it?" and "arguments, arguments, demonstrations" are used to establish the structure of the article, but this is only the establishment of the basic framework. The content of writing also needs to be filled in the following four dimensions of space to achieve the standard combination of flesh and blood. High level - focus on long-term interests, see the essence through phenomena, and be good at sublimating themes.
Depth---pay attention to the depth of thought. The analysis and understanding of the problem should not be too superficial, especially the analysis of the causes.
Breadth---Broad vision when writing, good at applying diffuse thinking, subjective and objective, internal and external factors, past, present and future...
Strength---Have practical and effective problem solving The countermeasures are feasible and targeted.